IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/aea/aecrev/v105y2015i1p204-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Paying Attention or Paying Too Much in Medicare Part D

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Bjørn-Atle Reme & Helene Lie Røhr & Morten Sæthre, 2022. "Inattention in Contract Markets: Evidence from a Consolidation of Options in Telecom," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1019-1038, February.
  2. Sinaiko, Anna & Zeckhauser, Richard, 2016. "Enrollee Choices after Their Health Plans Are Terminated: Default Effects versus Persistent Preferences," Working Paper Series rwp16-055, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
  3. Christina M Dalton & Gautam Gowrisankaran & Robert J Town, 2020. "Salience, Myopia, and Complex Dynamic Incentives: Evidence from Medicare Part D," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 87(2), pages 822-869.
  4. Pilny, Adam & Wübker, Ansgar & Ziebarth, Nicolas R., 2017. "Introducing risk adjustment and free health plan choice in employer-based health insurance: Evidence from Germany," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 330-351.
  5. Kate Ho & Joseph Hogan & Fiona Scott Morton, 2017. "The impact of consumer inattention on insurer pricing in the Medicare Part D program," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 48(4), pages 877-905, December.
  6. Ulrike Malmendier, 2016. "The Bidder's Curse: Reply," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(4), pages 1195-1213, April.
  7. Drake, Coleman & Ryan, Conor & Dowd, Bryan, 2022. "Sources of inertia in the individual health insurance market," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
  8. Jin, Haofeng & Lu, Zhentong & Huang, Liqiang & Dou, Junsheng, 2021. "Not too much nor too little: Salience bias in mobile plan choices," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(4).
  9. Andrew T. Ching & Tülin Erdem & Michael P. Keane, 2017. "Empirical Models of Learning Dynamics: A Survey of Recent Developments," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Berend Wierenga & Ralf van der Lans (ed.), Handbook of Marketing Decision Models, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 223-257, Springer.
  10. Shakeeb Khan & Fu Ouyang & Elie Tamer, 2020. "Inference on Semiparametric Multinomial Response Models," Discussion Papers Series 627, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
  11. Maria Polyakova, 2016. "Regulation of Insurance with Adverse Selection and Switching Costs: Evidence from Medicare Part D," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(3), pages 165-195, July.
  12. Lee, Ajin & Vabson, Boris, 2024. "The value of improving insurance quality: Evidence from long-run Medicaid attrition," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
  13. Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein & Maria Polyakova, 2018. "Private Provision of Social Insurance: Drug-Specific Price Elasticities and Cost Sharing in Medicare Part D," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 122-153, August.
  14. Kurt Lavetti & Thomas DeLeire & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2023. "How do low‐income enrollees in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces respond to cost‐sharing?," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(1), pages 155-183, March.
  15. Tamara Bischof & Christian P.R. Schmid, 2018. "Consumer price sensitivity and health plan choice in a regulated competition setting," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(9), pages 1366-1379, September.
  16. Tamara Bischof & Michael Gerfin & Tobias Mueller, 2021. "Attention Please! Health Plan Choice and (In-)Attention," Diskussionsschriften dp2111, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
  17. Shakeeb Khan & Fu Ouyang & Elie Tamer, 2019. "Inference on Semiparametric Multinomial Response Models," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 980, Boston College Department of Economics.
  18. Janssen, Aljoscha & Granlund, David, 2023. "The importance of the first generic substitution: Evidence from Sweden," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 1-25.
  19. Ong, David, 2021. "Predicting choice-averse and choice-loving behaviors in a field experiment with actual shoppers," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 46-71.
  20. Jonathan D. Ketcham & Nicolai V. Kuminoff & Christopher A. Powers, 2016. "Estimating the Heterogeneous Welfare Effects of Choice Architecture: An Application to the Medicare Prescription Drug Insurance Market," NBER Working Papers 22732, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  21. Janssen, Aljoscha & Granlund, David, 2022. "The Importance of the First Generic Substitution: Evidence from Sweden," Working Paper Series 1428, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
  22. Florian Heiss & Daniel McFadden & Joachim Winter & Amelie Wuppermann & Bo Zhou, 2016. "Inattention and Switching Costs as Sources of Inertia in Medicare Part D," NBER Working Papers 22765, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  23. Khan, S. & Ponomareva, M. & Tamer, E., 2023. "Identification of dynamic binary response models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(1).
  24. David Ong, 2021. "Choice averse behavior and sampling risk: a field experiment with actual shoppers," Framed Field Experiments 00547, The Field Experiments Website.
  25. Keane, Michael & Ketcham, Jonathan & Kuminoff, Nicolai & Neal, Timothy, 2021. "Evaluating consumers’ choices of Medicare Part D plans: A study in behavioral welfare economics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 107-140.
  26. Jonathan D. Ketcham & Nicolai V. Kuminoff & Christopher A. Powers, 2016. "Choice Inconsistencies among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(12), pages 3932-3961, December.
  27. Francesco Decarolis & Maria Polyakova & Stephen P. Ryan, 2020. "Subsidy Design in Privately Provided Social Insurance: Lessons from Medicare Part D," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(5), pages 1712-1752.
  28. Jason Abaluck & Jonathan Gruber, 2016. "Improving the Quality of Choices in Health Insurance Markets," NBER Working Papers 22917, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  29. Benjamin Handel & Joshua Schwartzstein, 2018. "Frictions or Mental Gaps: What's Behind the Information We (Don't) Use and When Do We Care?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 32(1), pages 155-178, Winter.
  30. Janssen, Aljoscha, 2020. "Switching Costs, Brand Premia and Behavioral Pricing in the Pharmaceutical Market," Working Paper Series 1317, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
  31. M. Kate Bundorf & Maria Polyakova & Ming Tai-Seale, 2019. "How do Humans Interact with Algorithms? Experimental Evidence from Health Insurance," NBER Working Papers 25976, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  32. Shakeeb Khan & Maria Ponomareva & Elie Tamer, 2019. "Identification of Dynamic Panel Binary Response Models," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 979, Boston College Department of Economics.
  33. Shuo Zhang & Tat Y. Chan & Xueming Luo & Xiaoyi Wang, 2022. "Time-Inconsistent Preferences and Strategic Self-Control in Digital Content Consumption," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 616-636, May.
  34. Tomas Pedro Sanguinetti, 2019. "How Do Couples Choose Individual Insurance Plans? Evidence from Medicare Part D," 2019 Papers psa1760, Job Market Papers.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.