IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zur/econwp/464.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The talent paradox: why is it fair to reward talent but not luck?

Author

Listed:
  • Björn Bartling
  • Alexander W. Cappelen
  • Ingvild L. Skarpeid
  • Erik Ø. Sørensen
  • Bertil Tungodden

Abstract

This paper investigates how people differentiate between inequality caused by talent and inequality caused by luck in a large-scale study of the US population. We establish that people distinguish significantly between inequality due to luck and inequality due to talent, even when controlling for their beliefs about the extent to which these factors are within individual control. We refer to this as the “talent paradox.” In a novel experiment, we provide evidence suggesting that individuals are more accepting of inequality caused by talent than by luck because the benefits of talent are only realized if one acts upon it. In contrast, manipulating the extent to which talent is perceived as a personal characteristic has no effect on inequality acceptance. Our findings provide new evidence on the nature of people’s fairness views that sheds light on the political debate on the acceptability of inequality in society.

Suggested Citation

  • Björn Bartling & Alexander W. Cappelen & Ingvild L. Skarpeid & Erik Ø. Sørensen & Bertil Tungodden, 2025. "The talent paradox: why is it fair to reward talent but not luck?," ECON - Working Papers 464, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    • Handle: RePEc:zur:econwp:464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/270326/1/econwp464.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Talent; luck; effort; fairness; inequality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C9 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zur:econwp:464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Severin Oswald (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seizhch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.