IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzboem/fsi98107.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Türkische Unternehmerinnen und Beschäftigte im Berliner ethnischen Gewerbe

Author

Listed:
  • Hillmann, Felicitas

Abstract

Der vorliegende Beitrag päsentiert die Ergebnisse einer explorativen Studie über die Arbeits- und Beschäftigungssituation von Frauen in der Berliner Türkischen Ökonomie. Diese wurde im Frühjahr 1998 durchgeführt. Insgesamt wurden 50 Unternehmerinnen und abhängig Beschäftigte befragt. Damit handelt es sich um Forschungsneuland: es ist die erste empirische Untersuchung, die sich dezidiert der Situation der weiblichen Beschäftigten im ethnischen Gewerbe in Berlin zuwendet. Im Mittelpunkt stehen Fragen nach der Strukturierung dieses Ausschnittes des Arbeitsmarktes: nach der Arbeitsorganisation und der Beschäftigungssituation, nach der Bedeutung von Familienbeziehungen für die Arbeitsorganisaiton und nach der Positionierung der türkischen Frauen innerhalb des ethnischen Gewerbes. Als analytischer Rahmen dient erstens die internationale, vorwiegend englischsprachige, Literatur zur Geschlechtsspezifik von ethnischen Ökonomien. Hieraus werden die forschungsleitenden Fragen entwickelt. Zweitens wird das regionale Beispiel Berlin durch die Skizzierung der jüngsten Arbeitsmarktentwicklungen vorgestellt und erkennbare Ethnisierungsprozesse werden aufgezeigt. Die Untersuchungsergebnisse zeigen, daß im Falle der türkischen Unternehmerinnen in Berlin nicht von einer Übertragbarkeit des Konzeptes der 'ethnischen Ökonomien' ausgegangen werden kann. Vielmehr wird deutlich, daß sich die türkischen Unternehmerinnen - anders als die abhängig Beschäftigten - nicht mit der ethnischen Ökonomie identifizieren und in sich teilweise sogar explizit von dieser abwenden. Sie greifen in der Regel nicht auf die Beschäftigung 'ethnischer' Arbeitskräfte bzw. Familienmitglieder zurück und besitzen nicht generell 'ethnisch' geprägte Zuliefererbeziehungen. Die Zusammenfassung zeigt Forschungsdesiderate auf.

Suggested Citation

  • Hillmann, Felicitas, 1998. "Türkische Unternehmerinnen und Beschäftigte im Berliner ethnischen Gewerbe," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organization and Employment FS I 98-107, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzboem:fsi98107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/44069/1/26980286X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hillmann, Felicitas & Rudolph, Hedwig, 1997. "Redistributing the cake? Ethnicisation processes in the Berlin food sector," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organization and Employment FS I 97-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Thomas J. Cooke & Adrian J. Bailey, 1996. "Family Migration and the Employment of Married Women and Men," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 38-48, January.
    3. Miera, Frauke, 1996. "Zuwanderer und Zuwanderinnen aus Polen in Berlin in den 90er Jahren: Thesen über Auswirkungen der Migrationspolitiken auf ihre Arbeitsmarktsituation und Netzwerke," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organization and Employment FS I 96-106, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Kontos, 2003. "Self-employment policies and migrants' entrepreneurship in Germany," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 119-135, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Abraham & Natascha Nisic, 2012. "A simple mobility game for couples’ migration decisions and some quasi-experimental evidence1," Rationality and Society, , vol. 24(2), pages 168-197, May.
    2. Danzer, Alexander M. & Dietz, Barbara & Gatskova, Ksenia & Schmillen, Achim, 2014. "Showing off to the new neighbors? Income, socioeconomic status and consumption patterns of internal migrants," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 230-245.
    3. Nivalainen, Satu, 2000. "Migration And Post-Move Employment In Two-Earner Families," ERSA conference papers ersa00p47, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Switek, Maggie, 2012. "Internal Migration and Life Satisfaction: Well-Being Effects of Moving as a Young Adult," IZA Discussion Papers 7016, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Malgorzata Switek, 2016. "Internal Migration and Life Satisfaction: Well-Being Paths of Young Adult Migrants," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 191-241, January.
    6. Zaiceva, Anzelika, 2010. "East-West migration and gender: Is there a differential effect for migrant women?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 443-454, April.
    7. Raluca Prelipceanu, 2010. "A Gendered Approach To Temporary Labour Migration And Cultural Norms The Case Of Migration From Romania," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 4(1), pages 54-90, JUNE.
    8. Seong Woo Lee & Dowell Myers & Seong‐Kyu Ha & Hae Ran Shin, 2005. "What If Immigrants Had Not Migrated?," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 609-636, April.
    9. Uzi Rebhun, 2010. "Immigration, Gender, and Earnings in Israel," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 26(1), pages 73-97, February.
    10. Janice Compton & Robert A. Pollak, 2007. "Why Are Power Couples Increasingly Concentrated in Large Metropolitan Areas?," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 25(3), pages 475-512.
    11. Uzi Rebhun, 2008. "A Double Disadvantage? Immigration, Gender, and Employment Status in Israel," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 24(1), pages 87-113, March.
    12. Jeroen Smits, 2001. "Career Migration, Self-selection and the Earnings of Married Men and Women in the Netherlands, 1981-93," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(3), pages 541-562, March.
    13. Clara H Mulder & Gunnar Malmberg, 2014. "Local Ties and Family Migration," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(9), pages 2195-2211, September.
    14. Karina Nilsson, 2001. "Migration, Gender and the Household Structure: Changes in Earnings Among Young Adults in Sweden," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 499-511.
    15. Cynthia J. Langlykke, 2001. "The benefits of workforce integration and housing concentration for imigrant groups, with related policy inferences drawn from immigration trends in Germany and Berlin," NEURUS papers neurusp27, NEURUS - Network of European and US Regional and Urban Studies.
    16. William A.V. Clark & Suzanne Davies Withers, 2007. "Family migration and mobility sequences in the United States," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 17(20), pages 591-622.
    17. Adrian J. Bailey & Thomas J. Cooke, 1998. "Family Migration and Employment: The Importance of Migration History and Gender," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 21(2), pages 99-118, August.
    18. Sergi Vidal & Johannes Huinink, 2019. "Introduction to the special collection on spatial mobility, family dynamics, and gender relations," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(21), pages 593-616.
    19. Steven Tenn, 2010. "The relative importance of the husband’s and wife’s characteristics in family migration, 1960–2000," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 23(4), pages 1319-1337, September.
    20. Maria Brandén & Karen Haandrikman, 2019. "Who Moves to Whom? Gender Differences in the Distance Moved to a Shared Residence," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 35(3), pages 435-458, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzboem:fsi98107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.