IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzboem/fsi96106.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Zuwanderer und Zuwanderinnen aus Polen in Berlin in den 90er Jahren: Thesen über Auswirkungen der Migrationspolitiken auf ihre Arbeitsmarktsituation und Netzwerke

Author

Listed:
  • Miera, Frauke

Abstract

Im vorliegenden Papier werden die seit 1989 gegenüber Polen neu ausgestalteten bundesdeutschen Migrationspolitiken systematisiert. Folgende potentiellen Migrationswege im Spektrum zwischen Niederlassung, neuer 'Gastarbeit' und Prekarisierung werden aufgeschlüsselt: Zu- oder Pendelwanderung von (Spät)aussiedlerInnen und deutschen Staatsangehörigen polnischer Herkunft, Familiennachziehenden und HeiratsmigrantInnen, UnternehmensgründerInnen, Gast-, Werkvertrags-, SaisonarbeitnehmerInnen und GrenzgängerInnen sowie von (erwerbstätigen) TouristInnen bzw. prekarisierten MigrantInnen. Die verschiedenen Formen der Pendelmigration und der prekarisierten Migration sowie die besonders für Frauen typische Heiratsmigration werden als Resultate der restriktiven Zuwanderungspolitiken interpretiert. Im Mittelpunkt steht die Frage danach, wie sich die Migrationspolitiken auf die Erfordernisse und Möglichkeiten der neuen MigrantInnen bei der Arbeitsmarktintegration in Berlin sowie auf die Strukturen und Funktionen ihrer Netzwerke auswirken. Thesenartig wird herausgearbeitet, daß die Politiken erstens spezifische Netzwerkstrukturen fördern können, die den rechtlich festgelegten Statusgruppen entsprechen. Zweitens können die institutionellen Regelungen bestehende soziale Beziehungsgeflechte beeinflussen, indem sie hier Hierarchien und Machtverhältnisse verfestigen. Abschließend wird zur Diskussion gestellt, welche Potentiale sozialen Kapitals aus diesen Netzwerken erwachsen können.

Suggested Citation

  • Miera, Frauke, 1996. "Zuwanderer und Zuwanderinnen aus Polen in Berlin in den 90er Jahren: Thesen über Auswirkungen der Migrationspolitiken auf ihre Arbeitsmarktsituation und Netzwerke," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organization and Employment FS I 96-106, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzboem:fsi96106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/44041/1/226640159.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quack, Sigrid, 1994. ""Da muß man sich durch einen langen, dunklen Tunnel tasten...": zur beruflichen Eingliederung von Aussiedlerinnen und Aussiedlern in Deutschland," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 250-269.
    2. Folbre, Nancy, 1986. "Cleaning house : New perspectives on Households and Economic Development," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 5-40, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hillmann, Felicitas, 1998. "Türkische Unternehmerinnen und Beschäftigte im Berliner ethnischen Gewerbe," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organization and Employment FS I 98-107, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ina GANGULI & Ricardo HAUSMANN & Martina VIARENGO, 2014. "Closing the gender gap in education: What is the state of gaps in labour force participation for women, wives and mothers?," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 153(2), pages 173-207, June.
    2. Henrietta L. Moore, 1995. "The Future of Work," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 657-678, December.
    3. Frank, Odile, 1990. "The childbearing family in sub-Saharan Africa : structure, fertility, and the future," Policy Research Working Paper Series 509, The World Bank.
    4. Jere R. Behrman, 1994. "Intra-family Distribution in Developing Countries," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 253-296.
    5. Jere R. Behrman & Andrew D. Foster & Mark R. Rosenzweig & Prem Vashishtha, 1999. "Women's Schooling, Home Teaching, and Economic Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 107(4), pages 682-714, August.
    6. Deschênes, Sarah & Dumas, Christelle & Lambert, Sylvie, 2020. "Household resources and individual strategies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    7. Naila Kabeer, 1992. "Evaluating Cost‐Benefit Analysis as a Tool for Gender Planning," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 23(2), pages 115-139, April.
    8. Weijland, H. & Herweijer, R. & Groot, J.P. de, 1988. "Female participation in agriculture in the Dominican Republic : an analysis of a segmented rural labour market," Serie Research Memoranda 0016, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    9. Folbre N., 1993. "Women and social security in Latin America, the Caribbean and sub- saharan Africa," ILO Working Papers 992932813402676, International Labour Organization.
    10. Donald Cox & Beth J. Soldo, 2004. "Motivation for Money and Care that Adult Children Provide for Parents: Evidence from "Point-Blank" Survey Questions," Working Papers, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College 2004-17, Center for Retirement Research.
    11. Wendy Olsen & University of Manchester & Smita Mehta & Cambridge University, 2006. "A Pluralist Account of Labour Participation in India," Economics Series Working Papers GPRG-WPS-042, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    12. Anderson, Siwan & Eswaran, Mukesh, 2009. "What determines female autonomy? Evidence from Bangladesh," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 179-191, November.
    13. Rigg, Jonathan & Salamanca, Albert & Phongsiri, Monchai & Sripun, Mattara, 2018. "More farmers, less farming? Understanding the truncated agrarian transition in Thailand," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 327-337.
    14. Elissa Braunstein & Nancy Folbre, 2001. "To Honor and Obey: Efficiency, Inequality, and Patriarchal Property Rights," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 25-44.
    15. Maxwell, Daniel G. & Wiebe, Keith D., 1998. "Land Tenure And Food Security: A Review Of Concepts, Evidence, And Methods," Research Papers 12752, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Land Tenure Center.
    16. Sangeetha Madhavan & Mark Collinson & Tyler W. Myroniuk & Randall Kuhn, 2017. "Household structure vs. composition: Understanding gendered effects on educational progress in rural South Africa," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(59), pages 1891-1916.
    17. Puetz, Detlev & Webb, Patrick & von Braun, Joachim, 1989. "Irrigation technology and commercialization of rice in the Gambia: effects on income and nutrition," Research reports 75, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    18. Chiappori, Pierre-André & Donni, Olivier, 2009. "Non-unitary Models of Household Behavior: A Survey of the Literature," IZA Discussion Papers 4603, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Harsha Aturupane & Anil B. Deolalikar & Dileni Gunewardena, 2008. "The Determinants of Child Weight and Height in Sri Lanka: A Quantile Regression Approach," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2008-53, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. Diane L. Wolf, 1990. "Daughters, Decisions and Domination: An Empirical and Conceptual Critique of Household Strategies," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 21(1), pages 43-74, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzboem:fsi96106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.