IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbior/spiii2006102.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lernprozesse im Kontext von UN-Weltgipfeln: Die Vergesellschaftung internationalen Regierens

Author

Listed:
  • Böhling, Kathrin
  • Busch, Tanja
  • Berthoin Antal, Ariane
  • Hofmann, Jeanette

Abstract

In diesem Beitrag wird eine Forschungsperspektive entwickelt, die Weltgipfel der Vereinten Nationen als organisierte Handlungszusammenhänge betrachtet in denen sich Lernprozesse auf supranationaler Ebene vollziehen. Damit wird ein neuer analytischer Blickwinkel auf die Einbeziehung nichtstaatlicher Akteure vorgeschlagen, der die Dynamik internationalen Regierens zum Ausgangspunkt nimmt. Die Gipfeltreffen der Vereinten Nationen sind weit mehr als Foren für zwischenstaatliches Verhandeln, denn zivilgesellschaftliche und privatwirtschaftliche Akteure haben in der Willensbildung und Entscheidungsfindung über globale Probleme deutlich an Gewicht gewonnen. Lernprozesse bewegen sich in diesem Kontext zwischen den strukturellen Voraussetzungen internationaler Willensbildung und Handlung, was zu einem besonderen Interesse für die Art und Weise führt, wie Regeln der internationalen Willensbildung interpretiert, angewendet, reinterpretiert und reformuliert oder gar ignoriert werden. Mit Theorien des Organisationslernens können so die förderlichen und hinderlichen Bedingungen untersucht werden, unter denen die Einbindung nichtstaatlicher Akteure zu komplexeren Verständnissen von globalen Problemen und sachgerechteren Lösungen beiträgt und eine breitere Akzeptanz der getroffenen Entscheidungen in Reichweite rückt.

Suggested Citation

  • Böhling, Kathrin & Busch, Tanja & Berthoin Antal, Ariane & Hofmann, Jeanette, 2006. "Lernprozesse im Kontext von UN-Weltgipfeln: Die Vergesellschaftung internationalen Regierens," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2006-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbior:spiii2006102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/47915/1/525357416.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barnat, Miriam, 2005. "Lernen und Macht in einer Non-Profit Organisation," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2005-103, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Berthoin Antal, Ariane & Dierkes, Meinolf & MacMillan, Keith & Marz, Lutz, 2002. "Corporate social reporting revisited," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organisation and Technology FS II 02-105, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Mark Easterby‐Smith & Mary Crossan & Davide Nicolini, 2000. "Organizational Learning: Debates Past, Present And Future," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 783-796, September.
    4. Dany, Charlotte, 2006. "The impact of participation: how civil society organisations contribute to the democratic quality of the UN world summit on the information society," TranState Working Papers 43, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    5. Frank Blackler & Seonaidh McDonald, 2000. "Power, Mastery And Organizational Learning," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 833-852, September.
    6. Braithwaite,John & Drahos,Peter, 2000. "Global Business Regulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521784993, November.
    7. Mayntz, Renate, 2000. "Politikwissenschaft in einer entgrenzten Welt," MPIfG Discussion Paper 00/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    8. Hofmann, Jeanette, 2002. "Verfahren der Willensbildung und Selbstverwaltung im Internet: Das Beispiel ICANN und die At-Large-Membership," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organisation and Technology FS II 02-109, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Monciardini & Guido Conaldi, 2019. "The European regulation of corporate social responsibility: The role of beneficiaries' intermediaries," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 240-259, June.
    2. Daniel Fitzpatrick & Rebecca Monson, 2022. "Property rights and climate migration: Adaptive governance in the South Pacific," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 519-535, April.
    3. Andreas Panagopoulos, 2004. "When Does Patent Protection Stimulate Innovation?," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 04/565, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
    4. Anna Hutchens, 2011. "Playing games of governance: How and why Fair Trade pioneers evade corporate capture," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 221-240, June.
    5. Dario Blanco-Fernandez & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2022. "Interactions between the individual and the group level in organizations: The case of learning and autonomous group adaptation," Papers 2203.09162, arXiv.org.
    6. Mennicken, Andrea, 2006. "Translation and standardisation: audit world building in Post-Soviet Russia," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 3033, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic & Sigrid Quack, 2004. "Governing Globalization – Bringing Institutions Back In," Post-Print hal-01892007, HAL.
    8. Philip James & Lilian Miles & Richard Croucher & Mark Houssart, 2019. "Regulating factory safety in the Bangladeshi garment industry," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 431-444, September.
    9. Ungericht Bernhard & Hirt Christian, 2010. "CSR as a Political Arena: The Struggle for a European Framework," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, December.
    10. Emilie Cloatre & Robert Dingwall, 2013. "“Embedded regulation:” The migration of objects, scripts, and governance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 365-386, September.
    11. Bartsch, Sonja & Kohlmorgen, Lars, 2007. "The Role of Southern Actors in Global Governance: The Fight against HIV/AIDS," GIGA Working Papers 46, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    12. Jon Reast & Adam Lindgreen & Joëlle Vanhamme & François Maon, 2010. "The Manchester Super Casino: Experience and Learning in a Cross-Sector Social Partnership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 197-218, July.
    13. Liang Chen & Wanli Li, 2022. "Language acquisition and regional innovation: Evidence from English proficiency in China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 178-191, January.
    14. Braithwaite, John, 2006. "Responsive regulation and developing economies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 884-898, May.
    15. Li, Wen Helena & Guo, Bin & De Sisto, Marco, 2021. "Untangling the commonalities and differences between domestic cross-regional experience and international experience in shaping speed of internationalization," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(2).
    16. Olsen, Per Ingvar & Prenkert, Frans & Hoholm, Thomas & Harrison, Debbie, 2014. "The dynamics of networked power in a concentrated business network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2579-2589.
    17. Pompeu Casanovas & Louis de Koker & Mustafa Hashmi, 2022. "Law, Socio-Legal Governance, the Internet of Things, and Industry 4.0: A Middle-Out/Inside-Out Approach," J, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-28, January.
    18. Janina Grabs & Graeme Auld & Benjamin Cashore, 2021. "Private regulation, public policy, and the perils of adverse ontological selection," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1183-1208, October.
    19. Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, 2011. "Global Governance," Chapters, in: Jonathan Michie (ed.), The Handbook of Globalisation, Second Edition, chapter 19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Arh, Tanja & Blazic, Borka Jerman & Dimovski, Vlado, 2012. "The impact of technology-enhanced organisational learning on business performance: An empirical study," Journal of East European Management Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 17(3), pages 369-383.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbior:spiii2006102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.