IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/umiodp/82021.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Losen statt Stimmverluste unter Prozent-Hürden und bei Sitzanteilen

Author

Listed:
  • Dilger, Alexander

Abstract

Prozent-Hürden sollen eine Zersplitterung in Parlamenten verhindern und Parteien nur in Fraktionsstärke hineinlassen. Dazu werden bislang die Stimmen für Parteien unterhalb der Hürde gar nicht berücksichtigt. Diese Ungleichheit der Wahl und Benachteiligung von kleinen Parteien ließe sich dadurch vermeiden, dass von den kleineren Parteien unterhalb der Hürde eine ausgelost wird, die die Mandate für die Stimmen all dieser kleinen Parteien erhält. Alternativ könnte jede kleinere Partei mit einer Wahrscheinlichkeit, die zu ihrem Stimmanteil proportional ist, in Fraktionsstärke einziehen oder eine freiwillige Bildung von Losgemeinschaften erlaubt werden. Schließlich kann das Losen auch als Alternative zu den gängigen Wahlverfahren verwendet werden, um Bruchteile an Mandaten zuzuteilen oder um Stichwahlen um eine Position zu ersetzen.

Suggested Citation

  • Dilger, Alexander, 2021. "Losen statt Stimmverluste unter Prozent-Hürden und bei Sitzanteilen," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 8/2021, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:umiodp:82021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/241289/1/1769984127.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Demko, Stephen & Hill, Theodore P., 1988. "Equitable distribution of indivisible objects," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 145-158, October.
    2. Dilger, Alexander, 2021. "Einfache Vermeidung von Stimmverlusten durch Prozent-Hürden," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 7/2021, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aziz, Haris & Hougaard, Jens Leth & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D. & Østerdal, Lars Peter, 2017. "Computational aspects of assigning agents to a line," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 93-99.
    2. Anna Bogomolnaia & Herv'e Moulin, 2024. "Guaranteed shares of benefits and costs," Papers 2406.14198, arXiv.org.
    3. Anna Bogomolnaia & Herve Moulin, 2022. "Fair Division with Money and Prices," Papers 2202.08117, arXiv.org.
    4. Nicolò, Antonio & Yu, Yan, 2008. "Strategic divide and choose," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 268-289, September.
    5. Jens Hougaard & Hervé Moulin & Lars Østerdal, 2010. "Decentralized pricing in minimum cost spanning trees," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 44(2), pages 293-306, August.
    6. Eve Ramaekers, 2013. "Fair allocation of indivisible goods: the two-agent case," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(2), pages 359-380, July.
    7. Dall'Aglio, Marco & Mosca, Raffaele, 2007. "How to allocate hard candies fairly," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 218-237, December.
    8. Moulin, Herve, 2005. "Minimizing the Worst Slowdown: Off-Line and On-Line," Working Papers 2005-03, Rice University, Department of Economics.
    9. Thomson, William, 2011. "Chapter Twenty-One - Fair Allocation Rules," Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, in: K. J. Arrow & A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 21, pages 393-506, Elsevier.
    10. Haris Aziz, 2016. "A generalization of the AL method for fair allocation of indivisible objects," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 4(2), pages 307-324, October.
    11. Hervé Moulin, 2007. "Minimizing the Worst Slowdown: Offline, Online," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 876-889, October.
    12. Marco Dall'Aglio & Camilla Di Luca & Lucia Milone, 2017. "Finding the Pareto optimal equitable allocation of homogeneous divisible goods among three players," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 27(3), pages 35-50.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • K16 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Election Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:umiodp:82021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilmuede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.