IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/umiodp/42017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Vor- und Nachteile verschiedener Arten von Drittmitteln

Author

Listed:
  • Dilger, Alexander

Abstract

Es gibt verschiedene Arten von Drittmitteln für wissenschaftliche Forschung. Insbesondere lassen sich Drittmittel für freie Forschung, zur ergebnisoffenen Themenbearbeitung und für spezifizierte Auftragsforschung unterscheiden. Deren jeweilige Vor- und Nachteile werden diskutiert, auch im Verhältnis zur Grundfinanzierung.

Suggested Citation

  • Dilger, Alexander, 2017. "Vor- und Nachteile verschiedener Arten von Drittmitteln," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 4/2017, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:umiodp:42017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/162115/1/888195974.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dilger, Alexander, 2016. "Implikationen des Wissenschaftszeitvertragsgesetzes für Hochschulen und Mitarbeiter," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 03/2016, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    2. Dilger, Alexander, 2012. "Förderung von Wissenschaft zu nationalen und europäischen Fragen," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 5/2012, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dilger, Alexander, 2016. "Herausforderungen der Flüchtlingskrise für Hochschulen," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 09/2016, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • H44 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets
    • H52 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Education

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:umiodp:42017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilmuede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.