IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/tucdir/32011.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Innovationskompetenz und Performanz

Author

Listed:
  • Hallensleben, Tobias
  • Jain, Anil K.
  • Manger, Daniela
  • Moldaschl, Manfred

Abstract

Welche Rolle spielen Innovationen für den Bestand und den Erfolg von Unternehmen in einer Wettbewerbswirtschaft? Das ist wohl die grundlegendste Frage, die sich die Managementwissenschaft in Bezug auf Strategien der Neuerung stellt. Vielfach begnügt sie sich mit der Antwort, daß die Bedeutung von Innovationen zunehme (was an wachsenden FuEAufwendungen, kürzeren Produktlebenszyklen und ähnlichen Indikatoren abgelesen wird) und fragt dann, was Unternehmen in die Lage versetzt, Innovationen besser zu managen (mehr, schneller, radikaler, effizienter). So definiert sich Innovationsmanagement als Fach. Seit sich die Organisationsforschung und -theorie immer mehr mit Fragen des organisationalen Wandels befasst (weil Wandel wichtiger wird oder weil das Mode ist oder warum auch immer) und das Strategische Management als weitere Subdisziplin die Leitfrage, welche Unternehmensstrategien nachhaltige Wettbewerbsvorteile versprechen, überwiegend mit „Entwicklung von Innovationsfähigkeit“ beantwortet, wächst hier gegen den Spezialisierungstrend ein Forschungsfeld zusammen. In diesem verortet sich unser Beitrag. Die erste Frage ist eine genuine der Unternehmenstheorie, auch wenn sie natürlich empiristisch behandelt werden kann - also theorielos. Im vorliegenden Beitrag stellen wir Ergebnisse unserer empirischen Arbeiten zur zweiten Frage vor: Was ist Innovationsfähigkeit, und wie erlangt man sie? Sie basieren auf dem theoretischen Ansatz der Institutionellen Reflexivität (Moldaschl 2005, 2006), den wir einleitend kurz vorstellen. Er ist seinerseits ein Segment unserer Variante einer Evolutorischen Theorie der Unternehmung, die sich auch mit der erstgenannten Frage beschäftigt (Moldaschl 2011). Sie sucht den konstruktiven Wettbewerb mit der Competence-based View of the Firm und mit Ansätzen, die dieser gegenüber (ebenfalls) kritisch sind, etwa dem Konzept der Ambidexterity (z.B. Feldman/Pentland 2003; Güttel 2009) oder solchen, die auf Austrian Economics bauen (z.B. Lewin/Phelan 2000; Freiling et al. 2006).

Suggested Citation

  • Hallensleben, Tobias & Jain, Anil K. & Manger, Daniela & Moldaschl, Manfred, 2011. "Innovationskompetenz und Performanz," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 3/2011, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:tucdir:32011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/55379/1/684999781.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hagedoorn, John & Cloodt, Myriam, 2003. "Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1365-1379, September.
    2. Wu, Yen-Chun Jim & Lee, Pi-Ju, 2007. "The use of patent analysis in assessing ITS innovations: US, Europe and Japan," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 568-586, July.
    3. Bode, Eckhardt & Dohse, Dirk & Krieger-Boden, Christiane & Sander, Birgit & Soltwedel, Rüdiger & Hagen, Tobias & Brenke, Karl & Eickelpasch, Alexander & Vesper, Dieter & Blien, Uwe & Fuchs, Johann & H, 2002. "Fortschritte beim Aufbau Ost: Forschungsbericht wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Forschungsinstitute über die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung in Ostdeutschland," Kiel Discussion Papers 391, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Horst Hanusch & Andreas Pyka, 2007. "Principles of Neo-Schumpeterian Economics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 31(2), pages 275-289, March.
    5. Moldaschl, Manfred, 2011. "Warum Gazellen nachts nicht leuchten: Evolutorische Theorie der Unternehmung," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 1/2011, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    6. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    7. Joerg Freiling, 2004. "A Competence-based Theory of the Firm," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 15(1), pages 27-52.
    8. Lewin, Peter & Phelan, Steven E, 2000. "An Austrian Theory of the Firm," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 13(1), pages 59-79, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moldaschl, Manfred, 2011. "Warum Gazellen nachts nicht leuchten: Evolutorische Theorie der Unternehmung," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 1/2011, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    2. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    3. Davide Consoli & Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2011. "Complexity and the Coordination of Technological Knowledge: The Case of Innovation Platforms," Chapters, in: Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 8 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Frank T. Rothaermel & Maria Tereza Alexandre, 2009. "Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 759-780, August.
    5. Sylvia Maxfield, 2008. "Reconciling Corporate Citizenship and Competitive Strategy: Insights from Economic Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 367-377, June.
    6. A. Madureira & F. Hartog & N. Baken, 2016. "A holonic framework to understand and apply information processes in evolutionary economics: survey and proposal," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 157-190, September.
    7. John Hamilton, 2020. "The Strategic Change Matrix and Business Sustainability across COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Rakesh B. Sambharya & Jooh Lee, 2014. "Renewing Dynamic Capabilities Globally: An Empirical Study of the World’s Largest MNCs," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 137-169, April.
    9. Frank T. Rothaermel & Andrew M. Hess, 2007. "Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 898-921, December.
    10. Lewandowska Małgorzata Stefania, 2015. "Capturing Absorptive Capacity: Concepts, Determinants, Measurement Modes and Role in Open Innovation," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 45(1), pages 32-56, March.
    11. JinHyo Joseph Yun & EuiSeob Jeong & JinSeu Park, 2016. "Network Analysis of Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Michael Stephan, 2010. "Does Outsourcing Result in the Outsourcing of Technological Competencies? An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Vertical Specialization on the Technological Competence Base of Firms," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 21(3), pages 308-331.
    13. Lee, Simon U. & Park, Gunno & Kang, Jina, 2018. "The double-edged effects of the corporate venture capital unit's structural autonomy on corporate investors' explorative and exploitative innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 141-149.
    14. Burmann, Christoph & Jost-Benz, Marc & Riley, Nicola, 2009. "Towards an identity-based brand equity model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 390-397, March.
    15. Yu-Ming Zhai & Wan-Qin Sun & Sang-Bing Tsai & Zhen Wang & Yu Zhao & Quan Chen, 2018. "An Empirical Study on Entrepreneurial Orientation, Absorptive Capacity, and SMEs’ Innovation Performance: A Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Kyungsuk Lee & Taewoo Roh, 2020. "Proactive Divestiture and Business Innovation: R&D Input and Output Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Dushnitsky, Gary & Lenox, Michael J., 2005. "When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 615-639, June.
    18. René Belderbos & Leo Sleuwaegen & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2010. "Market Integration and Technological Leadership in Europe," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 403, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    19. Hsu, Fang-Ming & Hsueh, Chao-Chih, 2009. "Measuring relative efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects: A three-stage approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 178-186, May.
    20. Luukkonen, Terttu, 2008. "Different Types of Venture Capital Investors and Value-added to High-Tech Portfolio Firms," Discussion Papers 1149, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tucdir:32011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwtucde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.