IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb597/130.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Kollidieren die Güter? Juridische und politische Reaktionen auf Zielkonflikte internationalisierter Sicherheitspolitk

Author

Listed:
  • Mayer, Sebastian

Abstract

Um äußere Sicherheit unter erschwerten objektiven Bedingungen wie gestiegenen Erwartungen nach wie vor hinreichend gewährleisten zu können, haben sich die Regierungen vor allem der OECD-Welt nach dem Ende des Systemantagonismus zu einer noch engeren Zusammenarbeit im Rahmen internationaler Sicherheitsorganisationen entschlossen, die auf einen Bedeutungsgewinn inter- und supranationaler Ebenen hinausläuft. Dieser Strukturwandel des Regierens verursacht indes Zielkonflikte zu Lasten anderer zentraler normativer Güter, Rechtsstaatlichkeit und demokratische Legitimität, die sich zu brisanten Kollisionen auswachsen könnten. So zieht internationalisierte Sicherheitspolitik oftmals gravierende Eingriffe in die Rechtssphäre des Individuums nach sich, und die nationalen Exekutiven lassen sich schlechter demokratisch kontrollieren. Das forschungsprogrammatisch motivierte Papier beschreibt Internationalisierung, diskutiert die Spannungen zwischen den drei Normkomplexen und identifiziert exemplarisch Reaktionen juridischer und politischer Akteure darauf. Im Kern wird argumentiert, dass sich die Aussicht auf eine demokratisch legitimierte und rechtsstaatlich verfasste internationalisierte Sicherheitspolitik nicht vorrangig an der Weiterentwicklung eines nationalen Blickwinkels mit seiner Input-Orientierung und der Vorstellung intakter Legitimationsketten ausrichten sollte, sondern verstärkt aus Alternativquellen demokratischer Legitimität oberhalb des Nationalstaats und aus Rechtsquellen unterschiedlicher Ebenen schöpfen sollte.

Suggested Citation

  • Mayer, Sebastian, 2010. "Kollidieren die Güter? Juridische und politische Reaktionen auf Zielkonflikte internationalisierter Sicherheitspolitk," TranState Working Papers 130, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb597:130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/41592/1/635772434.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deitelhoff, Nicole & Geis, Anna, 2009. "Securing the state, undermining democracy: internationalization and privatization of western militaries," TranState Working Papers 92, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    2. Fischer-Lescano, Andreas & Kommer, Steffen & Frisina, Lorraine, 2009. "Internationalisierung der Sicherheitsgewährleistung. Rechtsfragen der deutschen Mitgliedschaft in der Nato," TranState Working Papers 91, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    3. Jachtenfuchs, Markus, 2005. "2 The monopoly of legitimate force: denationalization, or business as usual," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(S1), pages 37-52, March.
    4. Jack E. Vincent & Ira L. Straus & Richard R. Biondi, 2001. "Capability Theory and the Future of NATO's Decisionmaking Rules," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 38(1), pages 67-86, January.
    5. Joachim, Jutta, 2010. "Transformation of the state? Reactions to the privatization of security in Great Britain," TranState Working Papers 135, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    6. Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias, 2004. "Explaining Government Preferences for Institutional Change in EU Foreign and Security Policy," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(1), pages 137-174, February.
    7. Held, David, 1997. "Democracy and globalization," MPIfG Working Paper 97/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    8. Easton, David, 1975. "A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(4), pages 435-457, October.
    9. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1999. "Regieren in Europa: Effektiv und demokratisch?," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 0, number sbd-1999.
    10. Keohane, Robert O. & Macedo, Stephen & Moravcsik, Andrew, 2009. "Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(1), pages 1-31, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emschermann, Katharina, 2013. "The good internationalist: U.S. responses to trade-offs in internationalized security policy in the 1995 Bosnia debate," TranState Working Papers 176, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Bernauer & Steffen Mohrenberg & Vally Koubi, 2020. "Do citizens evaluate international cooperation based on information about procedural and outcome quality?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 505-529, April.
    2. Haunss, Sebastian & Schneider, Steffen, 2013. "The discursive legitimation of political regimes: A network perspective," TranState Working Papers 177, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    3. Julian Aichholzer & Sylvia Kritzinger & Carolina Plescia, 2021. "National identity profiles and support for the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(2), pages 293-315, June.
    4. Soetkin Verhaegen & Marc Hooghe & Ellen Quintelier, 2014. "European Identity and Support for European Integration: A Matter of Perceived Economic Benefits?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 295-314, May.
    5. Weidner, Helmut, 2005. "Global equity versus public interest? The case of climate change policy in Germany," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Civil Society and Transnational Networks SP IV 2005-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Arjan H Schakel & A J Brown, 2022. "Dissecting Public Opinion on Regional Authority: Four Types of Regionalists Based on Citizens’ Preferences for Self-Rule and Shared Rule," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 52(2), pages 310-328.
    7. repec:gig:joupla:v:3:y:2011:i:1:p:29-64 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Delhey, Jan, 2002. "Korruption in Bewerberländern zur Europäischen Union: Institutionenqualität und Korruption in vergleichender Perspektive," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Social Structure and Social Reporting FS III 02-401, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    9. Arnaud Lechevalier & Jan Wielgohs, 2015. "Social Europe: A Dead End," Post-Print halshs-03781863, HAL.
    10. Libman, Alexander, 2005. "Взаимодействие Государственных И Частных Структур В Интеграционных Группировах: Теоретические Подходы И Опыт Снг [Interaction of Public and Private Actors in Regional Integration Groups - Theoretic," MPRA Paper 17044, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Daicia Price & Tore Bonsaksen & Mary Ruffolo & Janni Leung & Vivian Chiu & Hilde Thygesen & Mariyana Schoultz & Amy Ostertun Geirdal, 2021. "Perceived Trust in Public Authorities Nine Months after the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Cross-National Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, September.
    12. Martin Binder & Monika Heupel, 2020. "Rising Powers, UN Security Council Reform, and the Failure of Rhetorical Coercion," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 93-103, October.
    13. Luís Aguiar-Conraria & Pedro C. Magalhães, 2018. "Procedural Fairness, the Economy, and Support for Political Authorities (Forthcoming at Political Psychology (submitted pre-print version))," NIPE Working Papers 05/2018, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    14. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias, 2013. "Why do they want the UN to decide? A two-step model of public support for UN authority," TranState Working Papers 171, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    15. Johannes Urpelainen, 2012. "How Does Democratic Accountability Shape International Cooperation?," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(1), pages 28-55, February.
    16. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias, 2010. "Problem perception and public expectations in international institutions: Evidence from a German representative survey," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2010-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    17. Caroline Mcevoy, 2016. "The Role of Political Efficacy on Public Opinion in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(5), pages 1159-1174, September.
    18. Fenja Søndergaard Møller, 2019. "Blue blood or true blood: Why are levels of intrastate armed conflict so low in Middle Eastern monarchies?," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(5), pages 517-544, September.
    19. Höpner, Martin & Haas, Christine, 2021. "Dürfen europäische Gesetze Grundfreiheiten einschränken?," MPIfG Discussion Paper 21/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    20. Anna Kern, 2017. "The Effect of Direct Democratic Participation on Citizens’ Political Attitudes in Switzerland: The Difference between Availability and Use," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 16-26.
    21. Emschermann, Katharina, 2013. "The good internationalist: U.S. responses to trade-offs in internationalized security policy in the 1995 Bosnia debate," TranState Working Papers 176, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb597:130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zesbrde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.