IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb373/199776.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wild bootstrap versus moment-oriented bootstrap

Author

Listed:
  • Sommerfeld, Volker

Abstract

We investigate the relative merits of a moment-oriented bootstrap method of Bunke (1997) in comparison with the classical wild bootstrap of Wu (1986) in nonparametric heteroscedastic regression situations. The moment-oriented bootstrap is a wild bootstrap based on local estimators of higher order error moments that are smoothed by kernel smoothers. In this paper we perform an asymptotic comparison of these two dierent bootstrap procedures. We show that the moment-oriented bootstrap is in no case worse than the wild bootstrap. We consider the cases of bandwidths with MISE-optimal rates and of bandwidths with rates that perform an optimal bootstrap approximation. When the regression function has the same amount of smoothness as the second and the third order error moment, then it turns out that, in the former case, our method better approximates the distribution of the pivotal statistic than the usual wild bootstrap does. The reason for this behavior is the unavoidable bias in nonparametric regression estimation that permits only a suboptimal amount of smoothing in the classical wild bootstrap case. In the latter case we need more smoothness of the error moments to make the moment-oriented bootstrap better than wild bootstrap. These results are applied to the construction of pointwise confidence intervals where we prove that our bootstrap has a superior behavior for equal smoothness of the regression function and error moments.

Suggested Citation

  • Sommerfeld, Volker, 1997. "Wild bootstrap versus moment-oriented bootstrap," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1997,76, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb373:199776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/66312/1/729563855.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bunke, O. & Droge, B. & Polzehl, J., 1995. "Model Selection, Transformations and Variance Estimation in Nonlinear Regression," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1995,52, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    2. Hardle, W. & Huet, S. & Jolivet, E., 1991. "Better Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Regression Curve Estimation," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1991056, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Enno Mammen, "undated". "Comparing nonparametric versus parametric regression fits," Statistic und Oekonometrie 9205, Humboldt Universitaet Berlin.
    4. Sommerfeld, Volker, 1997. "Construction of automatic confidence intervals in nonparametric heteroscedastic regression by a moment-oriented bootstrap," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1997,22, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dabo-Niang, Sophie & Francq, Christian & Zakoïan, Jean-Michel, 2010. "Combining Nonparametric and Optimal Linear Time Series Predictions," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(492), pages 1554-1565.
    2. Bissantz, Nicolai & Holzmann, Hajo, 2007. "Statistical inference for inverse problems," Technical Reports 2007,40, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    3. Escanciano, Juan Carlos & Jacho-Chávez, David T., 2010. "Approximating the critical values of Cramér-von Mises tests in general parametric conditional specifications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 625-636, March.
    4. Juei-Chao Chen, 1994. "Testing for no effect in nonparametric regression via spline smoothing techniques," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 46(2), pages 251-265, June.
    5. Poulin, Jennifer & Duchesne, Pierre, 2008. "On the power transformation of kernel-based tests for serial correlation in vector time series: Some finite sample results and a comparison with the bootstrap," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(9), pages 4432-4457, May.
    6. Mark Fiecas & Hernando Ombao, 2016. "Modeling the Evolution of Dynamic Brain Processes During an Associative Learning Experiment," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1440-1453, October.
    7. Kyle Handley & Nuno Limão, 2013. "Policy Uncertainty, Trade and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for China and the U.S," NBER Working Papers 19376, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. repec:cwl:cwldpp:1761rr is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Zhang, Chunming & Dette, Holger, 2003. "A power comparison between nonparametric regression tests," Technical Reports 2003,22, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    10. Zhang, Chun-Xia & Mei, Chang-Lin & Zhang, Jiang-She, 2007. "An empirical study of a test for polynomial relationships in randomly right censored regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 6543-6556, August.
    11. Neumann, Michael H. & Paparoditis, Efstathios, 1998. "A nonparametric test for the stationary density," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1998,58, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    12. Anatolyev Stanislav, 2019. "Testing for a Functional Form of Mean Regression in a Fully Parametric Environment," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Dette, Holger & Hetzler, Benjamin, 2004. "Specification tests indexed by bandwidths," Technical Reports 2004,48, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    14. Pascal Lavergne & Valentin Patilea, 2011. "One for All and All for One: Regression Checks With Many Regressors," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 41-52, January.
    15. John W. Galbraith & Simon van Norden, 2008. "The Calibration of Probabilistic Economic Forecasts," CIRANO Working Papers 2008s-28, CIRANO.
    16. W. González-Manteiga & R. Cao, 1993. "Testing the hypothesis of a general linear model using nonparametric regression estimation," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 2(1), pages 161-188, December.
    17. Bartels, Knut, 1998. "A model specification test," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1998,109, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    18. Jeffrey S. Racine & Christopher F. Parmeter, 2012. "Data-Driven Model Evaluation: A Test for Revealed Performance," Department of Economics Working Papers 2012-13, McMaster University.
    19. Bunke, Olaf & Castell, Ernestina, 1998. "Regression and contrast estimated based on adaptive regressograms depending on qualitative explanatory variables," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1998,20, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    20. David C. Wheelock & Paul W. Wilson, 2011. "Are Credit Unions Too Small?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(4), pages 1343-1359, November.
    21. Neumeyer, Natalie & Dette, Holger & Nagel, Eva-Renate, 2003. "A note on testing symmetry of the error distribution in linear regression models," Technical Reports 2003,25, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb373:199776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfhubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.