IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgd/1711.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Digitale Souveränität: Technikutopien und Gestaltungsansprüche demokratischer Politik

Author

Listed:
  • Misterek, Fokko

Abstract

Nachdem 2013 die umfangreiche digitale Dauerüberwachung durch staatliche Sicherheitsbehörden ins Zentrum der öffentlichen Aufmerksamkeit geriet, entwickelte sich im europäischen Raum unter dem Schlagwort "digitale Souveränität" eine breite Debatte über Chancen und Risiken sowie Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten der Digitalisierung. In diesem Papier soll zunächst der Bedarf für eine stärkere gesellschaftliche Einbettung digitaler Technologien aufgezeigt werden, indem die ideologische Rahmung der Digitalisierung und ihre wesentlichen Entwicklungslinien in Form eines Literaturüberblicks herausgearbeitet werden. Nach einer Beschreibung des Regierungsverständnisses von digitaler Souveränität wird argumentiert, dass eine Erweiterung des Konzepts dazu beitragen könnte, die ursprünglich mit der Digitalisierung verbundenen, aber bisher weitestgehend enttäuschten emanzipatorischen Hoffnungen zu verwirklichen.

Suggested Citation

  • Misterek, Fokko, 2017. "Digitale Souveränität: Technikutopien und Gestaltungsansprüche demokratischer Politik," MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/11, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:1711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/162561/1/890874697.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/10771 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Eric Brousseau & Meryem Marzouki & Cécile Méadel, 2012. "Governance, Regulation and Powers on the Internet," Post-Print hal-01492356, HAL.
    3. Rodrik, Dani, 2007. "How to Save Globalization from its Cheerleaders," CEPR Discussion Papers 6494, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Justus Haucap & Ulrich Heimeshoff, 2014. "Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 49-61, February.
    5. Mowery, David C. & Simcoe, Timothy, 2002. "Is the Internet a US invention?--an economic and technological history of computer networking," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8-9), pages 1369-1387, December.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13263 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2012. "Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 881-898.
    8. Peter F. Cowhey & Jonathan D. Aronson, 2009. "Transforming Global Information and Communication Markets: The Political Economy of Innovation," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262012855, April.
    9. Steven Globerman, 1978. "Canadian Science Policy and Technological Sovereignty," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 4(1), pages 34-45, Winter.
    10. Stephen J Kobrin, 2001. "Territoriality and the Governance of Cyberspace," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 32(4), pages 687-704, December.
    11. Brousseau,Eric & Marzouki,Meryem & Méadel,Cécile (ed.), 2012. "Governance, Regulation and Powers on the Internet," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107013421, September.
    12. Nicholas Tsagourias, 2015. "The legal status of cyberspace," Chapters, in: Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace, chapter 1, pages 13-29, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thiel, Thorsten, 2019. "Souveränität: Dynamisierung und Kontestation in der digitalen Konstellation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 47-60.
    2. Dolata, Ulrich, 2020. "Internet – Plattformen – Regulierung: Koordination von Märkten und Kuratierung von Sozialität," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2020-01, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas Curien, 2013. "Net Neutrality is Imperfect and Should Remain So!," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 22, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    2. Bauer, Johannes M. & Shim, Woohyun, 2012. "Regulation and digital innovation: Theory and evidence," 23rd European Regional ITS Conference, Vienna 2012 60364, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    3. Nicolas Curien, 2013. "Net Neutrality is Imperfect and Should Remain So!," RSCAS Working Papers 2013/22, European University Institute.
    4. Haucap, Justus & Heimeshoff, Ulrich, 2017. "Ordnungspolitik in der digitalen Welt," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 90, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    5. Haucap, Justus & Kehder, Christiane, 2018. "Welchen Ordnungsrahmen braucht die Sharing Economy?," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 94, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    6. Küper, Inken & Edinger-Schons, Laura Marie, 2020. "Is sharing up for sale? Monetary exchanges in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 223-234.
    7. Shaheer, Noman Ahmed & Li, Sali, 2020. "The CAGE around cyberspace? How digital innovations internationalize in a virtual world," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).
    8. Jose María Martín‐Martín & María S. Ostos‐Rey & Jose A. Salinas‐Fernández, 2019. "Why Regulation Is Needed in Emerging Markets in the Tourism Sector," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(1), pages 225-254, January.
    9. Asuamah Yeboah, Samuel, 2023. "Sustaining Change: Unravelling the Socio-cultural Threads of Sustainable Consumption," MPRA Paper 117981, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Jun 2023.
    10. Pieper, Nadine & Woisetschläger, David M., 2024. "Customer misbehavior in access-based mobility services: An examination of prevention strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    11. Paolo E. Giordani & Francesco Rullani, 2020. "The Digital Revolution and COVID-19," Working Papers 06, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    12. Alessandro Avenali & Yuri Maria Chianese & Graziano Ciucciarelli & Giorgio Grani & Laura Palagi, 2019. "Profit optimization in one-way free float car sharing services: a user based relocation strategy relying on price differentiation and Urban Area Values," DIAG Technical Reports 2019-04, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    13. Dingju Zhu, 2020. "Big Data based Research on Mechanisms of Sharing Economy Restructuring the World," Papers 2001.08926, arXiv.org.
    14. Emmanuelle Reuter, 2022. "Hybrid business models in the sharing economy: The role of business model design for managing the environmental paradox," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 603-618, February.
    15. Isabel Miralles & Domenico Dentoni & Stefano Pascucci, 2017. "Understanding the organization of sharing economy in agri-food systems: evidence from alternative food networks in Valencia," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 833-854, December.
    16. Lutz, Christoph & Newlands, Gemma, 2018. "Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 187-196.
    17. Zhao, Taiyang & Lu, Yan & Lynette Wang, Valerie & Wu, Banggang & Chen, Zhi & Song, Wei & Zhou, Liying, 2023. "Shared but unhappy? Detrimental effects of using shared products on psychological ownership and consumer happiness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    18. Frederik Plewnia & Edeltraud Guenther, 2017. "Advancing a sustainable sharing economy with interdisciplinary research [Der Beitrag interdisziplinärer Forschung zu einer nachhaltigen Sharing Economy]," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 117-124, June.
    19. Myriam Ertz & Jonathan Deschênes & Emine Sarigöllü, 2021. "From User to Provider: Switching Over in the Collaborative Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Valeria Andreoni, 2020. "The Trap of Success: A Paradox of Scale for Sharing Economy and Degrowth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Digitalisierung; Internet; Demokratie; Souveränität; Digitalpolitik;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:1711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.