IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/201706.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Brauchen wir NGOs?

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo
  • Valentinov, Vladislav

Abstract

Zivilgesellschaftliche Organisationen erfüllen in der modernen Demokratie zwei wichtige Funktionen. Zum einen stellen sie öffentliche Güter und Dienstleistungen bereit ('service delivery'). Zum anderen dienen sie der politischen Interessenvertretung ('advocacy'). Allerdings sehen sich zivilgesellschaftliche Organisationen gegenwärtig mit Anreizdefiziten konfrontiert, die systematisch zu zwei verschiedenen Arten von Diskursversagen führen, was ihre Advocacy-Funktion stark beeinträchtigen kann. Hiergegen hilft eine Ordnungspolitik zweiter Ordnung, die den zivilgesellschaftlichen Organisationen Anreize setzt, sich selbst zu regulieren.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2017. "Brauchen wir NGOs?," Discussion Papers 2017-06, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:201706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170462/1/dp2017-06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pies, Ingo, 2013. "Ordnungsethik der Zivilgesellschaft: Eine ordonomische Argumentationsskizze aus gegebenem Anlass," Discussion Papers 2013-1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Pies, Ingo, 2016. "Hunger durch Agrarspekulation? Zur Geschichte eines Fehl-Alarms," Discussion Papers 2016-08, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Hielscher, Stefan & Pies, Ingo & Valentinov, Vladislav & Chatalova, Lioudmila, 2016. "Rationalizing the GMO debate: The ordonomic approach to addressing agricultural myths," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10.
    4. Stefan Hielscher & Ingo Pies & Vladislav Valentinov, 2012. "How to Foster Social Progress: An Ordonomic Perspective on Progressive Institutional Change," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 779-798.
    5. Valentinov, Vladislav & Hielscher, Stefan & Pies, Ingo, 2015. "Nonprofit organizations, institutional economics, and systems thinking," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 491-501.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pies, Ingo, 2017. "Replik: eine interdisziplinäre Verständigung ist schwierig, aber möglich und lohnend," Discussion Papers 2017-07, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven E. Wallis & Vladislav Valentinov, 2017. "A Limit to Our Thinking and Some Unanticipated Moral Consequences: A Science of Conceptual Systems Perspective with Some Potential Solutions," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 103-116, April.
    2. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "Der ordonomische Ansatz: Eine Illustration am Beispiel des Mindestlohns," Discussion Papers 2014-17, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Stefan Hielscher & Ingo Pies, 2016. "Emergent Social Dilemmas in Modern Society: An Institutional Economics Perspective (A comment on Valentinov and Chatalova)," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 483-487, May.
    4. Stefan Hielscher & Ingo Pies & Vladislav Valentinov & Lioudmila Chatalova, 2016. "Rationalizing the GMO Debate: The Ordonomic Approach to Addressing Agricultural Myths," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10, May.
    5. Hielscher, Stefan & Pies, Ingo & Valentinov, Vladislav & Chatalova, Lioudmila, 2016. "Rationalizing the GMO debate: The ordonomic approach to addressing agricultural myths," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10.
    6. Chaddad, Fabio & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2017. "Agency costs and organizational architecture of large corporate farms: evidence from Brazil," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 201-220.
    7. Pies, Ingo, 2013. "Ethik der Agrarspekulation: Rückblick und Ausblick," Discussion Papers 2013-7, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    8. Renata Klafke & André Torres Urdan & Simone R. Didonet & Maik Arnold, 2021. "Institutional theory, culture and value co-creation: how do they stick together in donation?," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(3), pages 447-466, September.
    9. Will, Matthias Georg & Pies, Ingo, 2014. "Discourse and regulation failures: The ambivalent influence of NGOs on political organizations," Discussion Papers 2014-2, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    10. Canh, Nguyen Phuc & Schinckus, Christophe & Thanh, Su Dinh & Hui Ling, Felicia Chong, 2020. "Effects of the internet, mobile, and land phones on income inequality and The Kuznets curve: Cross country analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10).
    11. Denisa Gajdová & Helena Majdúchová, 2018. "Financial Sustainability Criteria and their testing in the conditions of the Slovak Non-Profit Sector," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 12(1), March.
    12. Pies, Ingo & Will, Matthias Georg, 2013. "Finanzspekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen: Analyse und Bewertung aus wirtschaftsethischer Sicht," Discussion Papers 2013-24, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    13. Stefan Hielscher & Matthias Georg Will, 2014. "Mental Models of Sustainability: Unearthing and Analyzing the Mental Images of Corporate Sustainability with Qualitative Empirical Research," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 708-719, November.
    14. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2015. "From equilibrium to autopoiesis: A Luhmannian reading of Veblenian evolutionary economics," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 143-155.
    15. Steven E. Wallis, 2021. "Understanding and improving the usefulness of conceptual systems: An Integrative Propositional Analysis‐based perspective on levels of structure and emergence," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 426-447, August.
    16. Pies, Ingo, 2017. "Replik: eine interdisziplinäre Verständigung ist schwierig, aber möglich und lohnend," Discussion Papers 2017-07, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    17. Matthias Georg Will & Stefan Hielscher, 2014. "How do Companies Invest in Corporate Social Responsibility? An Ordonomic Contribution for Empirical CSR Research," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-23, July.
    18. Constantine Iliopoulos & Vladislav Valentinov, 2018. "Member Heterogeneity in Agricultural Cooperatives: A Systems-Theoretic Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    19. Elena Rosculete & Elena Bonciu & Catalin Aurelian Rosculete & Elena Teleanu, 2018. "Detection and Quantification of Genetically Modified Soybean in Some Food and Feed Products. A Case Study on Products Available on Romanian Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Renata Klafke & Simone Didonet, 2024. "The Yin and Yang Model of Value Co-Creation in the Non-Profit Sector," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 12(4), pages 647-660, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:201706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.