IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/201601.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Werte-Erziehung? Wirtschafts-Unterricht? Vier ordonomische Thesen zum schulischen Bildungsauftrag

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo

Abstract

Dieser Artikel formuliert aus der Perspektive des ordonomischen Forschungsprogramms vier Thesen zum schulischen Bildungsauftrag.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo, 2016. "Werte-Erziehung? Wirtschafts-Unterricht? Vier ordonomische Thesen zum schulischen Bildungsauftrag," Discussion Papers 2016-01, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:201601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170448/1/dp2016-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pies, Ingo, 2015. "Individualethik versus Institutionenethik? - Zur Moral (in) der Marktwirtschaft," Discussion Papers 2015-7, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Die Rolle der Institutionen: Fragen und Antworten zur Institutionenökonomik und Institutionenethik," Discussion Papers 2011-15, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Pies, Ingo, 2015. "Ordnungsethik für eine bessere Ordnungspolitik: Ordonomische Anregungen zum schulischen Bildungsauftrag," Discussion Papers 2015-1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pies, Ingo, 2017. "Ordonomik als Methode zur Generierung von Überbietungsargumenten: Eine Illustration anhand der Flüchtlings(politik)debatte," Discussion Papers 2017-03, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Engel, Gerhard, 2017. "Martin Luthers Wirtschaftsethik: Aufbruch zum Europäischen Sonderweg?," Discussion Papers 2017-15, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pies, Ingo, 2015. "Diskurs mit Schieflage: Eine ordnungsethische Nachbetrachtung der Mindeslohndebatte," Discussion Papers 2015-2, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Pies, Ingo, 2017. "Wider die Narreteien des Augenscheins: Wie lange noch wollen wir die junge Generation mit elaborierter Halbbildung abspeisen?," Discussion Papers 2017-10, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Wertekonsens; Regelkonsens; Wertepluralismus; Anreize; Institutionen; value consensus; rule consensus; value pluralism; incentives; institutions;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:201601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.