IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/20157.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Individualethik versus Institutionenethik? - Zur Moral (in) der Marktwirtschaft

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo

Abstract

In diesem Artikel wird die These vertreten, dass sich Individualethik und Institutionenethik nicht widersprechen müssen, sondern sogar Hand in Hand moralischem Fortschritt zuarbeiten können, sofern zwei Fehler vermieden werden, die zu den beiden Pathologien der Moderne führen – zu den Zwillingsphänomenen Moralismus und Zynismus. Diese These wird in vier Schritten entwickelt: Im ersten Schritt wird herausgearbeitet, dass Individualethik und Institutionenethik sich im Hinblick auf ihren je eigenen Argumentationsmodus unterscheiden. Im zweiten Schritt wird analysiert, wie diese beiden Argumentationsmodi komplementär zueinander eingesetzt werden können. Der dritte Schritt rekonstruiert die institutionenethische Kritik an einer Überdehnung individualethischer Argumente. Der vierte Schritt erläutert, welche Schlussfolgerungen hieraus für die Moral (in) der Marktwirtschaft zu ziehen sind.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo, 2015. "Individualethik versus Institutionenethik? - Zur Moral (in) der Marktwirtschaft," Discussion Papers 2015-7, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:20157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170440/1/dp2015-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pies, Ingo, 2005. "Theoretische Grundlagen demokratischer Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftspolitik - Der Beitrag von Karl Marx," Discussion Papers 2005-3, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Pies, Ingo, 2010. "Diagnosen der Moderne: Weber, Habermas, Hayek und Luhmann im Vergleich," Discussion Papers 2010-1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Die zwei Pathologien der Moderne: Eine ordonomische Argumentationsskizze," Discussion Papers 2011-14, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    4. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Beckmann, Markus, 2009. "Moral Commitments and the Societal Role of Business: An Ordonomic Approach to Corporate Citizenship," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 375-401, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pies, Ingo, 2016. "Werte-Erziehung? Wirtschafts-Unterricht? Vier ordonomische Thesen zum schulischen Bildungsauftrag," Discussion Papers 2016-01, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pies, Ingo, 2012. "Optimierung versus Koordinierung: Zur ordonomischen Klärung des wirtschaftsethischen Problems," Discussion Papers 2012-21, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "F. A. von Hayek und die moralische Qualität des Wettbewerbs," Discussion Papers 2014-12, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Regelkonsens statt Wertekonsens: Die Grundidee des politischen Liberalismus," Discussion Papers 2011-20, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    4. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2012. "Gründe versus Anreize? Ein ordonomischer Werkstattbericht in sechs Thesen," Discussion Papers 2012-8, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    5. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2013. "(Verhaltens-)Ökonomik versus (Ordnungs-)Ethik? Zum moralischen Stellenwert von Dispositionen und Institutionen," Discussion Papers 2013-22, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    6. Loy, Jens-Peter (ed.), 2014. "Marktwirtschaftliche Koordination: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. Symposium anlässlich des 75. Geburtstages von Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Ulrich Koester," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 77, number 77, September.
    7. Will, Matthias Georg & Hielscher, Stefan, 2013. "How do companies invest in corporate social responsibility? An ordonomic contribution for empirical CSR research," Discussion Papers 2013-3, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    8. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Everding, Sebastian, 2020. "Do hybrids impede sustainability? How semantic reorientations and governance reforms can produce and preserve sustainability in sharing business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 174-185.
    9. Will, Matthias Georg & Pies, Ingo, 2014. "Discourse and regulation failures: The ambivalent influence of NGOs on political organizations," Discussion Papers 2014-2, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    10. Wockenfuß, Christof, 2009. "Demokratie durch Entwicklungskonkurrenz," Discussion Papers 2009-17, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    11. Lisa Herzog, 2017. "No Company is an Island. Sector-Related Responsibilities as Elements of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 135-148, November.
    12. Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus & Hielscher, Stefan, 2009. "Sozialstruktur und Semantik - Ordonomik als Forschungsprogramm in der modernen (Welt-)Gesellschaft," Discussion Papers 2009-6, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    13. Stefan Hielscher & Matthias Georg Will, 2014. "Mental Models of Sustainability: Unearthing and Analyzing the Mental Images of Corporate Sustainability with Qualitative Empirical Research," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 708-719, November.
    14. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2015. "From equilibrium to autopoiesis: A Luhmannian reading of Veblenian evolutionary economics," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 143-155.
    15. Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus & Hielscher, Stefan, 2012. "The political role of the business firm: An ordonomic concept of corporate citizenship developed in comparison with the Aristoleian idea of individual citizenship," Discussion Papers 2012-1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    16. Ingo Pies & Philipp Schreck & Karl Homann, 2021. "Single-objective versus multi-objective theories of the firm: using a constitutional perspective to resolve an old debate," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 779-811, April.
    17. Hielscher, Stefan, 2015. "Ehre und Vertrauen im Fernhandel der Deutschen Hanse: Ein Beitrag zur Debatte um das Ideal des "Ehrbaren Kaufmanns" aus Sicht der Ordonomik," Discussion Papers 2015-12, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    18. Lucke Eva Maria & Lütge Christoph, 2011. "Moralisches Verhalten in einem korrupten Markt: Anreize und Erfolgsfaktoren anhand einer Fallstudie aus Argentinien / Moral behaviour in a corrupted market: Incentives and success factors – a case stu," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 62(1), pages 297-320, January.
    19. Pies, Ingo, 2017. "Replik: eine interdisziplinäre Verständigung ist schwierig, aber möglich und lohnend," Discussion Papers 2017-07, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    20. Matthias Georg Will & Stefan Hielscher, 2014. "How do Companies Invest in Corporate Social Responsibility? An Ordonomic Contribution for Empirical CSR Research," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-23, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:20157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.