IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/201326.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahme zum Argumentationspapier von Foodwatch

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo
  • Glauben, Thomas

Abstract

Dieser Beitrag nimmt aus ökonomischer und wirtschaftsethischer Sicht kritisch Stellung zu dem von Foodwatch am 21. November 2013 vorgelegten Argumentationspapier. Er analysiert die hiermit verbundenen Positionsänderungen und Positionskorrekturen der „Hungermacher“-Kampagne gegen die Finanzspekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen. Zudem verweist er darauf, dass diese Kampagne immer noch mit zahlreichen Aussagen arbeitet, die nicht korrekt sind.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo & Glauben, Thomas, 2013. "Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahme zum Argumentationspapier von Foodwatch," Discussion Papers 2013-26, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:201326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170412/1/dp2013-26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pies, Ingo, 2013. "Ordnungsethik der Zivilgesellschaft: Eine ordonomische Argumentationsskizze aus gegebenem Anlass," Discussion Papers 2013-1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Prehn, S. & Glauben, T. & Loy, J.-P. & Pies, I. & Will, M.G., 2015. "Der Einfluss von long-only-Indexfonds auf die Preisbildung und das Marktergebnis an landwirtschaftlichen Warenterminmärkten," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 50, March.
    3. repec:zbw:iamodp:161078 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Pies, Ingo, 2013. "Ethik der Agrarspekulation: Rückblick und Ausblick," Discussion Papers 2013-7, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pies, Ingo & Will, Matthias Georg, 2013. "Finanzspekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen: Analyse und Bewertung aus wirtschaftsethischer Sicht," Discussion Papers 2013-24, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Pies, Ingo, 2013. "Ethik der Agrarspekulation: Rückblick und Ausblick," Discussion Papers 2013-7, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "Wirtschaftsethik der Welternährung," Discussion Papers 2014-13, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    4. Pies, Ingo, 2013. "Agrarspekulation: Replik auf Thilo Bode," Discussion Papers 2013-5, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    5. Pies, Ingo & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2017. "Brauchen wir NGOs?," Discussion Papers 2017-06, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    6. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "Der ordonomische Ansatz: Eine Illustration am Beispiel des Mindestlohns," Discussion Papers 2014-17, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    7. Pies, Ingo, 2015. "Kommentar zur Spekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen: Eine Replik auf Christian Conrad," Discussion Papers 2015-11, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    8. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "Interview zur Moral der Finanzspekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen und zur Ordnungsethik der Zivilgesellschaft," Discussion Papers 2014-6, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    9. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2014. "Miteinander oder Gegeneinander? Zur Verhältnisbestimmung von Unternehmen und zivilgesellschaftlichen Organisationen," Discussion Papers 2014-3, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    10. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "Laudatio Max-Weber-Preis 2014 in der Kategorie Ausbildungs-Studienpreis," Discussion Papers 2014-19, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    11. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2013. "(Verhaltens-)Ökonomik versus (Ordnungs-)Ethik? Zum moralischen Stellenwert von Dispositionen und Institutionen," Discussion Papers 2013-22, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:201326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.