IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/kondp2/39.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Foreign investment and migration: Extensions of the basic model

Author

Listed:
  • Jones, Ronald Winthrop
  • Easton, Stephen T.

Abstract

The seminal work by Ramaswami (1968) comparing the advantages of allowing international labor inflows with those of foreign investment elicited an immediate response from Webb (1970). and subsequent elaborations by Bhagwati (1979). Calvo and Wellisz (1983), Bhagwati and Srinivasan (1983), and Ruffin (1984). This work served to confirm Ramaswami's suggestion that if international factor markets are in operation, it is preferable for a capital-rich country to admit foreign labor than to export some of its own capital to foreign countries if such labor could be obtained at the low wage rate prevailing abroad. The model developed in this literature was stripped down to such bare elements as to be dubbed the "basic model" in Jones, Coelho, and Easton (1986), an article which extended the reasoning employed by Ramaswami to analyze optimal policy when an active country can control jointly the international flows of labor and of capital. Simple assumptions often lead to striking conclusions, and optimal policy in the "basic model" was shown to involve subsidizing capital inflows from the low-wage, high-rent country. Indeed, first-best policy on the part of the active, capital-rich country was shown to involve almost a total "buy-out" of the other country's factor supplies at their autarky wages and rentals. The key assumptions of the basic model supporting such a strong result include: (i) The active home country can obtain cheap labor abroad at low foreign wage rates. The Ramaswami reasoning and the "buy-out" strategy break down if foreign workers on net receive the high wages prevailing at home. (ii) Technological knowledge and factor skills are the same in both countries. Both Ruffin (1984). and Calvo and Wellisz (1983) remark on the question of technological parity, but seem to disagree on the consequences of allowing differences in technology. (iii) All (both) factors are assumed to be internationally mobile. If the dimensions of the model were to be extended to allow the existence of some factor (say land) that was immobile, the complete "buy-out" strategy would obviously be thwarted. But would there nonetheless be a tendency for the active home country to attempt to obtain at least some quantities of those factors that are internationally mobile, even if this entails subsidies to get expensive factors to move? An analysis of this issue was presented by Jones and Coelho (1985) in the context of a model with many commodities and (even more numerous) factors. Kuhn and Wooton (1986). and Bond (1986) address this issue in the more simple context in which only one commodity is produced (as in the basic model), both labor and capital can flow between countries (subject to taxation or encouraged by subsidies), but a third factor (land) is immobile in each country. In the present paper we investigate the fate of the Ramaswami type of reasoning, which leads to a buy-out optimal strategy in the basic model, when technologies differ or when a third non-mobile factor is introduced. As in the basic model, international factor flows affect welfare in the active country both by the changes they bring about in world output and by induced changes in the "terms of trade", the factor prices paid to internationally mobile labor and capital. If the terms of trade effect were absent, the active home country would capture all the gains in world output. Our analysis proceeds by considering separately a set of world-output contours in factor space, and a set of terms-of-trade contours. A contract curve of maximal points connects these two sets of contours, and the optimal point for the home country is located on such a contract curve. This graphical device is employed in section I to review the argument for the basic model, in section II to investigate the case in which technology is inferior in the active home country, and in section III to establish the sense in which the Ramaswami reasoning is still in evidence even with immobile land.

Suggested Citation

  • Jones, Ronald Winthrop & Easton, Stephen T., 1987. "Foreign investment and migration: Extensions of the basic model," Discussion Papers, Series II 39, University of Konstanz, Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 178 "Internationalization of the Economy".
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:kondp2:39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/101708/1/741145723.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:econom:v:37:y:1970:i:145:p:81-84 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Bhagwati, Jagdish N. & Srinivasan, T. N., 1983. "On the choice between capital and labour mobility," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3-4), pages 209-221, May.
    3. Jones, Ronald W. & Coelho, Isaias & Easton, Stephen T., 1986. "The theory of international factor flows: The basic model," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3-4), pages 313-327, May.
    4. repec:bla:econom:v:52:y:1985:i:27:p:359-64 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Ruffin, Roy J., 1984. "International factor movements," Handbook of International Economics, in: R. W. Jones & P. B. Kenen (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, pages 237-288, Elsevier.
    6. Calvo, Guillermo & Wellisz, Stanislaw, 1983. "International factor mobility and national advantage," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1-2), pages 103-114, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tremblay, Rodrigue, 1998. "Mobilité internationale des facteurs de production en situation de chômage et de libre-échange," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 74(2), pages 245-271, juin.
    2. Gabriel Felbermayr & Wilhelm Kohler, 2014. "Can International Migration Ever Be Made a Pareto Improvement?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: European Economic Integration, WTO Membership, Immigration and Offshoring, chapter 11, pages 373-393, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Stephen Devadoss & Wongun Song, 2003. "Oligopsonistic Intermediate Input and Patterns of Trade," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 77-97.
    4. Slobodan Djajic & Michael S. Michael, 2009. "Temporary Migration Policies and Welfare of the Host and Source Countries: A Game-Theoretic Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 2811, CESifo.
    5. Kun-Ming Chen, 2011. "Outward foreign direct investment, wage rigidity and unemployment: A computable general equilibrium analysis," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 569-583.
    6. Carter, Thomas J., 1999. "Illegal immigration in an efficiency wage model," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 385-401, December.
    7. Emerson, Robert D. & Battiste, Anita L., 1988. "U.S. Agriculture and Foreign Workers: An Annotated Bibliography," Miscellaneous Publications 320011, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Jones, Ronald W., 2005. "Immigration vs. outsourcing: Effects on labor markets," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 105-114.
    9. Srinivasan, T.N., 1986. "International Trade and Factor Movements in Development Theory, Policy, and Experience," 1986: Trade and Development Meeting, December 1986, CIMMYT, Mexico City, Mexico 50651, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    10. Fathali Firoozi, 1998. "On the Second-Best Foreign Investment Policy and Pattern of Commodity Trade," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 42(1), pages 34-41, March.
    11. Djajic, Slobodan, 1985. "Minimum Wage, Unemployment and International Migration," Queen's Institute for Economic Research Discussion Papers 275201, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    12. Gabriel J Felbermayr & Wilhelm Kohler, 2014. "Immigration and Native Welfare," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: European Economic Integration, WTO Membership, Immigration and Offshoring, chapter 10, pages 335-372, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    13. Ronald Findlay & Stanislaw Wellisz, 1986. "Tariffs, quotas and domestic-content protection: some political economy considerations," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 221-242, January.
    14. Richard B. Freeman, 2006. "People Flows in Globalization," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 20(2), pages 145-170, Spring.
    15. Biswajit Mandal & Sugata Marjit & Noritsugu Nakanishi, 2018. "Outsourcing, factor prices and skill formation in countries with non-overlapping time zones," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(2), pages 289-304, August.
    16. Schiff, Maurice, 2002. "Love thy neighbor: trade, migration, and social capital," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 87-107, March.
    17. Charles Engel & Kenneth Kletzer, 1986. "Tariffs, Saving and the Current Account," NBER Working Papers 1869, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Susana Iranzo & Giovanni Peri, 2007. "Migration and Trade in a World of Technological Differences: Theory with an Application to Eastern-Western European Integration," NBER Working Papers 13631, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. James Markusen & Bridget Strand, 2008. "Offshoring of Business Services in Small Open Economies: Toward a General-Equilibrium Modeling Approach," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 231-246, December.
    20. Giovanni Facchini & Anna Maria Mayda, 2006. "Individual Attitudes towards Immigrants: Welfare-State Determinants Across Countries," Working Papers gueconwpa~06-06-02, Georgetown University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:kondp2:39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwkonde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.