IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iaqfor/301468.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Vom Büro ins Homeoffice: Erfahrungen von Verwaltungsbeschäftigten während der Corona-Krise

Author

Listed:
  • Kirsten, Julia
  • Miszk, Marco
  • Schorr, Sabrina
  • Zöll, Madita

Abstract

Wie im Rahmen einer qualitativen Studie deutlich wurde, stellte der coronabedingte Übergang ins Homeoffice (HO) Beschäftigte in Büroberufen vor besondere Herausforderungen, da häufig keine Infrastruktur für das Arbeiten im Homeoffice vorhanden war. Den Befragten fällt die Trennung von Arbeits‐ und Berufsleben oft schwer, was zu Belastung und/ oder Konflikten führen kann. Sie arbeiten im HO zudem häufiger trotz Krankheit. Positiv werden die Zeitersparnis, die vermehrten Zeitressourcen für die Familie und die Entlastung der Umwelt gesehen. Zudem registrieren die Verwaltungsbeschäftigten einen Imagegewinn des HO bei ihren Führungskräften. Die befragten Verwaltungsbeschäftigten wünschen sich daher mehrheitlich zukünftig hybridere Arbeitsformen.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirsten, Julia & Miszk, Marco & Schorr, Sabrina & Zöll, Madita, 2022. "Vom Büro ins Homeoffice: Erfahrungen von Verwaltungsbeschäftigten während der Corona-Krise," IAQ-Forschung 2022-06, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Work, Skills and Training (IAQ).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iaqfor:301468
    DOI: 10.17185/duepublico/76817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/301468/1/IAQ-Forschung-2022-06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17185/duepublico/76817?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Troll, Lothar, 1982. "Arbeitsplatz Büro : Beruf, Qualifikation und Arbeitsplatzsituation im Wandel," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 15(4), pages 480-496.
    2. Zucco, Aline & Lott, Yvonne, 2021. "Stand der Gleichstellung: Ein Jahr Corona," WSI Reports 64, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    3. Herrmann, Mario & Frey Cordes, Regina, 2020. "Homeoffice im Zeichen der Pandemie: Neue Perspektiven für Wissenschaft und Praxis?," IU Discussion Papers - Human Resources 2/2020, IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    4. Karl Brenke, 2016. "Home Office: Möglichkeiten werden bei weitem nicht ausgeschöpft," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(5), pages 95-105.
    5. Melissa Mazmanian & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2013. "The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1337-1357, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viktoria Maria Baumeister & Leonie Petra Kuen & Maike Bruckes & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "The Relationship of Work-Related ICT Use With Well-being, Incorporating the Role of Resources and Demands: A Meta-Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    2. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    3. Bettina Stadler & Franz Astleithner & Paul Malschinger, 2023. "Arbeitszeit zwischen Selbst- und Fremdbestimmung: Analysen des Mikrozensus Ad-hoc-Moduls 2019," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 241, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    4. Armanda Cetrulo & Dario Guarascio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2020. "Anatomy of the Italian occupational structure: concentrated power and distributed knowledge," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(6), pages 1345-1379.
    5. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1633-1661, December.
    6. Christian P Theurer & Andranik Tumasjan & Isabell M Welpe, 2018. "Contextual work design and employee innovative work behavior: When does autonomy matter?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-35, October.
    7. Jens Thoemmes, 2024. "Negotiating Telework in France: Collective Bargaining Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic," Post-Print hal-04619772, HAL.
    8. Andrea Salvatori & Seetha Menon & Wouter Zwysen, 2018. "The effect of computer use on job quality: Evidence from Europe," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 200, OECD Publishing.
    9. Nur Nahar Yasmin, 2024. "Four-day workweek in corporate sector: post-pandemic work arrangement for Bangladesh," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(7), pages 1-26, July.
    10. Ferdinando Paolo Santarpia & Laura Borgogni & Chiara Consiglio & Pietro Menatta, 2021. "The Bright and Dark Sides of Resources for Cross-Role Interrupting Behaviors and Work–Family Conflict: Preliminary Multigroup Findings on Remote and Traditional Working," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Reinhardt, Ronny & Gurtner, Sebastian, 2018. "The overlooked role of embeddedness in disruptive innovation theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 268-283.
    12. Yasuhiro Kotera & Katia Correa Vione, 2020. "Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Bertschek, Irene & Niebel, Thomas, 2016. "Mobile and more productive? Firm-level evidence on the productivity effects of mobile internet use," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 888-898.
    14. Mohamed Ali Ben Halima & Nathalie Greenan & Joseph Lanfranchi, 2021. "Organisational changes and long-term sickness absence and injury leave: a difference in difference approach," TEPP Working Paper 2021-05, TEPP.
    15. Rüttgers, Christian & Hochgürtel, Katharina, 2017. "New Work(ing Time): Was bedeutet die Digitalisierung der Arbeit für das Personalmanagement? Eine empirische Analyse der Einstellungen von Beschäftigten," ipo Schriftenreihe, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ipo Institut für Personal- & Organisationsforschung, volume 1, number 1 edited by FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, IPO Institut für Personal- & Organisationsforschung, June.
    16. Ylenia Curzi & Tommaso Fabbri & Barbara Pistoresi, 2021. "The Stressful Implications of Remote E-Working: Evidence from Europe," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(7), pages 108-108, July.
    17. Paula Jarzabkowski & Sarah Kaplan, 2015. "Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 537-558, April.
    18. Marinho, Marcelo & Amorim, Luís & Camara, Rafael & Oliveira, Brigitte Renata & Sobral, Marcos & Sampaio, Suzana, 2021. "Happier and further by going together: The importance of software team behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    19. Matthias Trier & Dennis Kundisch & Daniel Beverungen & Oliver Müller & Guido Schryen & Milad Mirbabaie & Simon Trang, 2023. "Digital Responsibility," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(4), pages 463-474, August.
    20. Jochmann-Döll, Andrea & Klenner, Christina & Scheele, Alexandra, 2022. "Entgeltgleichheit im digitalen Wandel? Eine explorative Studie zu betrieblichen Prüfungen der Entgeltgleichheit von Frauen und Männern," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 244, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iaqfor:301468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaqdude.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.