IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/fhfwps/306858.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Substantive use of artificial intelligence: The role of individual differences

Author

Listed:
  • Klesel, Michael
  • Messer, Uwe

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly powerful, enabling users to perform tasks more efficiently and effectively. However, not all users are equally able to take advantage of its capabilities. We draw on previous literature that has introduced the concept of "substantive use" - the reflective consideration of how to use a system's features - to better understand individual differences in the context of AI. We contribute to the current literature in three ways: First, we summarize the literature on technology use and describe its relevance for AI-related research. Second, we review the literature and show that IS has already begun to investigate individual differences to understand the use of AI systems. Third, we propose a theoretical model t hat accounts for the direct and configurational effects of individual differences on substantive use behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Klesel, Michael & Messer, Uwe, 2024. "Substantive use of artificial intelligence: The role of individual differences," Working Paper Series 32, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business and Law.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fhfwps:306858
    DOI: 10.48718/8d9d-b049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/306858/1/1909667579.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.48718/8d9d-b049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jussupow, Ekaterina & Spohrer, Kai & Heinzl, Armin & Gawlitza, Joshua, 2021. "Augmenting Medical Diagnosis Decisions? An Investigation into Physicians’ Decision-Making Process with Artificial Intelligence," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 137446, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Pascal Hamm & Michael Klesel & Patricia Coberger & H. Felix Wittmann, 2023. "Explanation matters: An experimental study on explainable AI," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Andrew Burton-Jones & Detmar W. Straub, 2006. "Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 228-246, September.
    4. Ekaterina Jussupow & Kai Spohrer & Armin Heinzl & Joshua Gawlitza, 2021. "Augmenting Medical Diagnosis Decisions? An Investigation into Physicians’ Decision-Making Process with Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 713-735, September.
    5. Omar A. El Sawy & Arvind Malhotra & YoungKi Park & Paul A. Pavlou, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 835-848, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christoph Riedl & Eric Bogert, 2024. "Effects of AI Feedback on Learning, the Skill Gap, and Intellectual Diversity," Papers 2409.18660, arXiv.org.
    2. Ulrich Gnewuch & Stefan Morana & Oliver Hinz & Ralf Kellner & Alexander Maedche, 2024. "More Than a Bot? The Impact of Disclosing Human Involvement on Customer Interactions with Hybrid Service Agents," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 936-955, September.
    3. Kevin Bauer & Andrej Gill, 2024. "Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Algorithmic Assessments, Transparency, and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 226-248, March.
    4. Mi, Yunlong & Wang, Zongrun & Quan, Pei & Shi, Yong, 2024. "A semi-supervised concept-cognitive computing system for dynamic classification decision making with limited feedback information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1123-1138.
    5. Sullivan, Yulia & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and adaptive response to market changes: A strategy to enhance firm performance and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Weiguang Wang & Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Ritu Agarwal, 2024. "Friend or Foe? Teaming Between Artificial Intelligence and Workers with Variation in Experience," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(9), pages 5753-5775, September.
    7. Dawei (David) Zhang & Gang Peng & Yuliang Yao & Tyson R. Browning, 2024. "Is a College Education Still Enough? The IT-Labor Relationship with Education Level, Task Routineness, and Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 992-1010, September.
    8. Singh, Nidhi & Jain, Monika & Kamal, Muhammad Mustafa & Bodhi, Rahul & Gupta, Bhumika, 2024. "Technological paradoxes and artificial intelligence implementation in healthcare. An application of paradox theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    9. Goutier, Marc & Diebel, Christopher & Adam, Martin & Benlian, Alexander, 2024. "Proactive and Reactive Help from Intelligent Agents in Identity-Relevant Tasks," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 142985, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    10. Tiwari, Manisha & Bryde, David J. & Stavropoulou, Foteini & Dubey, Rameshwar & Kumari, Sushma & Foropon, Cyril, 2024. "Modelling supply chain Visibility, digital Technologies, environmental dynamism and healthcare supply chain Resilience: An organisation information processing theory perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Michelle Vaccaro & Abdullah Almaatouq & Thomas Malone, 2024. "When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(12), pages 2293-2303, December.
    12. Fujita, Takaaki, 2024. "Expanding Horizons of Plithogenic SuperHyperStructures: Applications in Decision-Making, Control, and Neuro Systems," SocArXiv xqrd6, Center for Open Science.
    13. Erdem Dogukan Yilmaz & Christian Peukert, 2024. "Who Benefits from AI? Project-Level Evidence on Labor Demand, Operations and Profitability," CESifo Working Paper Series 11321, CESifo.
    14. Ritu Agarwal & Michelle Dugas & Guodong (Gordon) Gao, 2024. "Augmenting physicians with artificial intelligence to transform healthcare: Challenges and opportunities," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 360-374, March.
    15. Kevin Bauer & Moritz von Zahn & Oliver Hinz, 2023. "Expl(AI)ned: The Impact of Explainable Artificial Intelligence on Users’ Information Processing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1582-1602, December.
    16. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    17. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    18. Thorsten Schoormann & Julia Schweihoff & Ilka Jussen & Frederik Möller, 2023. "Classification tools for business models: Status quo, comparison, and agenda," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-36, December.
    19. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2022. "Designing AI‐augmented healthcare delivery systems for physician buy‐in and patient acceptance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4443-4451, December.
    20. Prasanna Tambe & Lorin M. Hitt, 2014. "Measuring Information Technology Spillovers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 53-71, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fhfwps:306858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwfhfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.