IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/300582.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Envisioning collective action for sustainable resource management. An economic experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Ortiz-Riomalo, Juan Felipe
  • Engel, Stefanie
  • Koessler, Ann-Kathrin

Abstract

Participatory vision-building (PVB) seems promising in fostering collective action to overcome complex social-environmental dilemmas and to attain socially desirable outcomes. By assisting the relevant actors in visualising their desired future and imagining how it would feel to be an active part of it, PVB makes the stated goals experiential, inspirational and meaningful, galvanising collective action. Nevertheless, it is still unclear whether PVB's causal impacts on collective action go beyond those of other elements of participatory processes that PVB also comprises, i.e. social interaction, information exchange and coordination around desirable strategies, outcomes or futures. We contribute to filling this gap through a (pre-registered) framed lab-in-the-field economic experiment conducted with 728 farmers from Lake Tota, Colombia. Participants chose between two stylised farming practices over multiple hypothetical growing seasons, impacting their seasonal earnings and the water levels of a hypothetical lake as a shared resource. We compare the behaviour of participants in a PVB treatment, in which they discussed and imagined a desired vision for the future, against the behaviour of participants in three control conditions. Albeit potentially effective for cooperation, the effects of PVB were found to be statistically indistinguishable from other participatory processes with similar aims. However, exploratory analysis suggests there might be potential impacts of PVB on emotions and preferences for pro-environmental and pro-social action. Future research could test the generalisability of our findings to other contexts, particularly those with heterogeneous interests, delve deeper into the underlying psychological mechanisms, and explore the interplay with other institutional mechanisms for fostering sustained collective action.

Suggested Citation

  • Ortiz-Riomalo, Juan Felipe & Engel, Stefanie & Koessler, Ann-Kathrin, 2024. "Envisioning collective action for sustainable resource management. An economic experiment," EconStor Preprints 300582, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:300582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/300582/1/OREK_2024_ECA_July2024_cl.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    collective action; social dilemmas; natural resource management; participatory processes; participatory governance; visioning;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • H40 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - General
    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General
    • Q24 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Land
    • Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • Q59 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:300582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.