IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esconf/88597.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Contributions for the quality of life through a participative approach for rural development – Experiences from Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Eastern Germany)

Author

Listed:
  • Pollermann, Kim
  • Raue, Petra
  • Schnaut, Gitta

Abstract

The challenges for the quality of life in rural areas in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, connected with structural economic and demographic changes, raise the question of how to find appropriate policy interventions in the specific situation of transitions countries. One approach to bring forward rural development is LEADER, a locally managed, place-based form of policy intervention. LEADER is bottom-up oriented and participatory with own regional budgets to fund projects. There are 13 LEADER-regions in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. To discuss the question of appropriate policy interventions, experiences in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern will be considered and a comparison with the LEADER-experiences in western Germany will be made. Therefore, the findings of the evaluation of Rural Development Programs (RDPs) in six federal states in Germany will be used to examine the performance of the LEADER-approach. In general a survey of LAG-members shows positive results regarding the performance of LEADER with no major discrepancies between Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and western Germany, but there are differences in participation structures (less working groups, but a higher share of female LAG-members in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern than in western Germany) and the role of the state sector. Problems for funding innovative projects were common, especially at the beginning of the funding period. To use the original and intended strengths of the LEADER approach, greater freedom for the Local Actions Groups (LAG) would be required (also in the European policy framework).

Suggested Citation

  • Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2013. "Contributions for the quality of life through a participative approach for rural development – Experiences from Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Eastern Germany)," EconStor Conference Papers 88597, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esconf:88597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/88597/1/IAMO_QoL_MV_EconStor.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Möllers, Judith & Buchenrieder, Gertrud & Csáki, Csaba (ed.), 2011. "Structural change in agriculture and rural livelihoods: Policy implications for the New Member States of the European Union," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 61, number 61.
    2. Judit Katona-Kovacs & Chris High & Gusztav Nemes, 2011. "Importance of Animation Actions in the Operation of Hungarian Local Action Groups," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1138, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    3. Schnaut, Gitta & Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra, 2012. "LEADER - an approach to innovative and suitable solutions in rural areas?," 131st Seminar, September 18-19, 2012, Prague, Czech Republic 135779, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2013. "Rural Development experiences in Germany: opportunities and obstacles in fostering smart places through LEADER," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 115(2), pages 1-7, June.
    5. Grieve, John & Lukesch, Robert & Weinspach, Ulrike & Fernandes, Pedro Alfonso & Brakalova, Marina & Cristiano, Simona & Geissendorfer, Manfred & Nemes, Gustav & O'Gready, S. & Sepulveda, Rodrigo Ortiz, 2011. "Capturing impacts of Leader and of measures to improve Quality of Life in rural areas," 122nd Seminar, February 17-18, 2011, Ancona, Italy 99363, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim Pollermann & Petra Raue & Gitta Schnaut, 2014. "Multi-level Governance in Rural Development: Analysing Experiences from LEADER for a Community-Led Local Development (CLLD)," ERSA conference papers ersa14p1071, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2014. "Multi-level Governance in rural development: Analysing experiences from LEADER for a Community-Led Local Development (CLLD)," EconStor Conference Papers 104063, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    3. Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2013. "Rural Development experiences in Germany: opportunities and obstacles in fostering smart places through LEADER," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 115(2), pages 1-7, June.
    4. Katona-Kovacs, Judit, 2014. "Where to put the focus in rural development? Changing the focus from funding to learning," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 116(1), pages 1-8, April.
    5. Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2017. "Input for and output of local governance in rural development," EconStor Conference Papers 173061, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    6. Mercedes Rodriguez & Luis Miguel Sanchez & Eugenio Cejudo & Jose Antonio Camacho, 2019. "Variety in local development strategies and employment: LEADER programme in Andalusia," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(1), pages 43-50.
    7. Franziska Lengerer & Tialda Haartsen & Annett Steinführer, 2023. "Exploring Justice in the Process of Redesigning Local Development Strategies for LEADER: Representation, Distribution, and Recognition," World, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Szabo, G. Gabor & Baranyai, Zsolt & Barta, Istvan, 2014. "Sustainability of Emerging Agricultural Co-operatives in the New Member States of the EU: Hungarian Experience," 142nd Seminar, May 29-30, 2014, Budapest, Hungary 170295, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Nemes, Gusztav & Varga, Agnes & High, Chris, 2014. "The evolution of the Hungarian agricultural knowledge system (AKS) since the EU enlargement," 142nd Seminar, May 29-30, 2014, Budapest, Hungary 169086, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Chmieliński, Paweł, 2016. "Selected aspects of the development of rural systems in Visegrad Group countries," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 13, pages 1-12.
    11. Dominika Milczarek-Andrzejewska, 2012. "Siła przetargowa gospodarstw rolnych w łańcuchach żywnościowych," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1-2, pages 135-153.
    12. Csaba Cs�ki & Attila J�mbor, 2013. "The impact of EU accession: lessons from the agriculture of the new member states," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 325-342, September.
    13. Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2016. "Implementation and impacts of the LEADER-approach – reflections on the intervention logic of a participatory approach for rural development," EconStor Conference Papers 148578, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    14. Mieczysław Adamowicz & Magdalena Zwolińska-Ligaj, 2020. "The “Smart Village” as a Way to Achieve Sustainable Development in Rural Areas of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    15. Zsófia Benedek & Imre Fertő & Adrienn Molnár, 2018. "Off to market: but which one? Understanding the participation of small-scale farmers in short food supply chains—a Hungarian case study," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(2), pages 383-398, June.
    16. Traikova, Diana & Manolova, Tatiana & Möllers, Judith & Buchenrieder, Gertrud, 2014. "Bribing culture and rural start-up plans in transition: evidence from Bulgaria," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182794, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Traikova, Diana, 2013. "Determinants of non-farm entrepreneurial intentions in a transitional context: Evidence from rural Bulgaria," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 72, number 72.
    18. Néstor Vercher, 2022. "The Role of Actors in Social Innovation in Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, May.
    19. Marek Furmankiewicz & Adrian Campbell, 2019. "From Single-Use Community Facilities Support to Integrated Sustainable Development: The Aims of Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Poland, 1990–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, October.
    20. De Luca Anna Irene & Iofrida Nathalie & Gulisano Giovanni & Strano Alfio, 2018. "Toward an evaluation model for transnational cooperation activities in rural areas: a case study within an EU LEADER project," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 42(42), pages 19-45, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    LEADER; Mecklenburg-Vorpommern; quality of Life; rural development; participation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H4 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esconf:88597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.