IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/stagec/165984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Where to put the focus in rural development? Changing the focus from funding to learning

Author

Listed:
  • Katona-Kovacs, Judit

Abstract

Since Hungary’s accession to the European Union (EU) most of the actions in rural areas have complied with the regulations of the funding programmes of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate why the focus of actions has to be changed from funding to learning. The paper is structured as follows. In the introduction, the author explains, in the light of her research experience since 2001, why a change in focus is needed. The main body of the paper shows how the need for this change can be explained from different perspectives. Firstly, structural change in the economy is given as a reason. Secondly, the need for change is explained from the concept of neo-endogenous rural development, i.e. the interplay between local and external forces. Finally the reason for shifting the focus from funding to learning is explained in terms of the endogenous and exogenous factors influencing rural development, based on the framework developed by the EU Framework 7 project ‘RuralJobs’. The paper concludes with some examples of the types of tools that have already been used and actions that should be implemented to achieve this change in focus.

Suggested Citation

  • Katona-Kovacs, Judit, 2014. "Where to put the focus in rural development? Changing the focus from funding to learning," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 116(1), pages 1-8, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:stagec:165984
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.165984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/165984/files/08-1327.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.165984?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fieldsend, Andrew & Székely, Erika, 2013. "An assessment of the agricultural knowledge and innovation system in Hungary," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 10, pages 1-18.
    2. Haase Svendsen, Gunnar Lind & Kjeldsen, Chris & Noe, Egon, 2010. "How do private entrepreneurs transform local social capital into economic capital? Four case studies from rural Denmark," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 631-644, December.
    3. Judit Katona-Kovacs & Chris High & Gusztav Nemes, 2011. "Importance of Animation Actions in the Operation of Hungarian Local Action Groups," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1138, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    4. Shuanglin Lin, 2009. "Guest Editor's Introduction," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 3-8, May.
    5. Nemes, Gusztáv & High, Christopher, 2013. "Old institutions, new challenges: the agricultural knowledge system in Hungary," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 115(2), pages 1-9, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Graziella Benedetto & Maria Bonaventura Forleo, 2020. "Foodies? movement fostering stakeholders? networks: A regional case study," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 22(3), pages 1-31.
    2. Szabo, G. Gabor & Baranyai, Zsolt & Barta, Istvan, 2014. "Sustainability of Emerging Agricultural Co-operatives in the New Member States of the EU: Hungarian Experience," 142nd Seminar, May 29-30, 2014, Budapest, Hungary 170295, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Kim Pollermann & Petra Raue & Gitta Schnaut, 2014. "Multi-level Governance in Rural Development: Analysing Experiences from LEADER for a Community-Led Local Development (CLLD)," ERSA conference papers ersa14p1071, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Antonio COSTA & Fabio DE MATTEIS & Daniela PREITE & Alessandra TAFURO, 2016. "WHAT IMPACT OF LOCAL ACTION GROUPs ON SOCIAL CAPITAL AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT?," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 9(9), pages 7-25, June.
    5. Backes-Gellner, Uschi & Moog, Petra, 2013. "The disposition to become an entrepreneur and the jacks-of-all-trades in social and human capital," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 55-72.
    6. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Shatu, Farjana Mostafiz & Hine, Julian & Turrell, Gavin, 2015. "Commuting mode choice in transit oriented development: Disentangling the effects of competitive neighbourhoods, travel attitudes, and self-selection," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 187-196.
    7. Tove Brink & Gunnar Lind Haase Svendsen, 2013. "Social Capital or Waste of Time ? Social Networks, Social Capital and ¡®Unconventional Alliances¡¯ among Danish Rural Entrepreneurs," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(1), pages 55-68, March.
    8. Parent, Milena M. & Rouillard, Christian & Naraine, Michael L., 2017. "Network governance of a multi-level, multi-sectoral sport event: Differences in coordinating ties and actors," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 497-509.
    9. Katona-Kovacs, Judit & Bóta-Horváth, Noémi, 2014. "Corporate Innovation a Missing Success Factor of Rural Development – Lessons Learned from the Past Decade," 142nd Seminar, May 29-30, 2014, Budapest, Hungary 169796, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Tarryn Kille & Retha Wiesner & Seung-Yong Lee & Melissa Johnson Morgan & Jane Summers & Daniel Davoodian, 2022. "Capital Factors Influencing Rural, Regional and Remote Women’s Entrepreneurship Development: An Australian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    11. Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2013. "Contributions for the quality of life through a participative approach for rural development – Experiences from Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Eastern Germany)," EconStor Conference Papers 88597, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    12. Singh, Yamini Jain & Lukman, Azhari & Flacke, Johannes & Zuidgeest, Mark & Van Maarseveen, M.F.A.M., 2017. "Measuring TOD around transit nodes - Towards TOD policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 96-111.
    13. Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2016. "Implementation and impacts of the LEADER-approach – reflections on the intervention logic of a participatory approach for rural development," EconStor Conference Papers 148578, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    14. Biczkowski Mirosław, 2020. "LEADER as a mechanism of neo-endogenous development of rural areas: the case of Poland," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 24(4), pages 232-244, October.
    15. Zsófia Benedek & Pál Géza Balogh & Lajos Baráth & Imre Fertő & Veronika Lajos & Éva Orbán & Gábor G. Szabó & Gusztáv Nemes, 2020. "The Kings of the Corona Crisis: The Impact of the outbreak of Covid‐19 on Small‐scale Producers in Hungary," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(3), pages 53-59, December.
    16. Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2014. "Multi-level Governance in rural development: Analysing experiences from LEADER for a Community-Led Local Development (CLLD)," EconStor Conference Papers 104063, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    17. Thorstensen Erik & Forsberg Ellen-Marie & Underthun Anders & Danihelka Pavel & Řeháček Jakub, 2016. "Regional Development and Climate Change Adaptation: A Study of the Role of Legitimacy," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 8(3), pages 207-226, September.
    18. Pollermann, Kim & Raue, Petra & Schnaut, Gitta, 2013. "Rural Development experiences in Germany: opportunities and obstacles in fostering smart places through LEADER," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 115(2), pages 1-7, June.
    19. Marek Furmankiewicz & Adrian Campbell, 2019. "From Single-Use Community Facilities Support to Integrated Sustainable Development: The Aims of Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Poland, 1990–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, October.
    20. Zhou, Lingxu & Chan, Eric & Song, Haiyan, 2017. "Social capital and entrepreneurial mobility in early-stage tourism development: A case from rural China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 338-350.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:stagec:165984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/akiiihu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.