IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cuswps/60.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ideologie und Erzählung: Die Bedeutung des marktfundamentalen Metanarrativs in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften

Author

Listed:
  • Heller, Hannah
  • Sagvosdkin, Valentin

Abstract

Die Wirtschaftswissenschaft spielt eine wesentliche Rolle im Drama der multiplen Gesellschaftskrise: Ihre dominanten Strömungen folgen einer ideologischen marktfundamentalen Erzählung, die die Krisen nicht adäquat erklären kann und sie dadurch verschärft. Ziel des Beitrages ist es, einen theoretischen und konzeptionellen Rahmen zu entwickeln, mit dem diese Erzählung expliziert und analysiert werden kann. Es kann etwa gezeigt werden, dass der Kern der Erzählung, "der Markt", in vielfachen sich widersprechenden Bedeutungen und Metaphern personifiziert und naturalisiert wird. Das Narrativ folgt einem dualen Weltbild, dass antagonistische Gegensätze konstruiert. So wird die Vielfalt an alternativen Möglichkeiten des Wirtschaftens, die durch die Menschen gestaltet und verantwortet werden, verschleiert.

Suggested Citation

  • Heller, Hannah & Sagvosdkin, Valentin, 2020. "Ideologie und Erzählung: Die Bedeutung des marktfundamentalen Metanarrativs in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie 60, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cuswps:60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/219040/1/1700244272.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Colander & Richard Holt & Barkley Rosser, 2004. "The changing face of mainstream economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 485-499.
    2. Daniel Hausknost & Willi Haas, 2019. "The Politics of Selection: Towards a Transformative Model of Environmental Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Venkatachalam, L., 2007. "Environmental economics and ecological economics: Where they can converge?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 550-558, March.
    4. Droß, Patrick J., 2013. "Ökonomisierungstrends im Dritten Sektor: Verbreitung und Auswirkungen von Wettbewerb und finanzieller Planungsunsicherheit in gemeinnützigen Organisationen," Discussion Papers, Project Group Civic Engagement SP V 2013-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    5. Rahlf, Thomas (Ed.), 2015. "Deutschland in Daten. Zeitreihen zur Historischen Statistik," EconStor Research Reports 124185, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    6. Reardon, Jack & Cato, Molly Scott & Madi, Maria Alejandra Caporale, . "Introducing a New Economics," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9781783712182.
    7. Reardon, Jack & Cato, Molly Scott & Madi, Maria Alejandra Caporale, 2018. "Introducing a New Economics," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780745334899, July.
    8. Nikolaus Kowall, 2013. "Das neoliberale Modell Genese, Politiken, Bilanz," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 124, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    9. Graupe, Silja, 2017. "Beeinflussung und Manipulation in der ökonomischen Bildung: Hintergründe und Beispiele," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-31, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    10. Akyel, Dominic, 2013. "Die Ökonomisierung der Pietät: Der Wandel des Bestattungsmarkts in Deutschland," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 76, number 76.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Urban, Janina & Rommel, Florian, 2020. "German economics: Its current form and content," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie 56, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    2. Rommel, Florian & Urban, Janina, 2022. "A Survey of German Economics," VfS Annual Conference 2022 (Basel): Big Data in Economics 264131, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    3. Jack Reardon, 2021. "Research Quality in Islamic Economics: A View from an Independent Expert جودة البحث في الاقتصاد الإسلامي: وجهة نظر من خبير مُستقل," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 34(2), pages 137-146, July.
    4. Yann Giraud, 2017. "The Contestable Marketplace of Ideas: Paul Samuelson’s Defense of Mainstream Economics through Textbook Making, 1967-1976," THEMA Working Papers 2017-19, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    5. Bartels, Charlotte, 2019. "Top Incomes in Germany, 1871–2014," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 79(3), pages 669-707, September.
    6. Stephan Puehringer, 2021. "Zur Pluralitaet der oekonomischen Politikberatung in Deutschland," ICAE Working Papers 132, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    7. Mazaher Kianpour & Stewart J. Kowalski & Harald Øverby, 2021. "Systematically Understanding Cybersecurity Economics: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-28, December.
    8. Alexandre Truc, 2023. "Neuroeconomics: Hype or Hope? An Answer," Post-Print hal-04719266, HAL.
    9. Höpner, Martin, 2019. "The German undervaluation regime under Bretton Woods: How Germany became the nightmare of the world economy," MPIfG Discussion Paper 19/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    10. Richard Holt & J. Barkley Rosser & David Colander, 2011. "The Complexity Era in Economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 357-369.
    11. Angela Ambrosino & Mario Cedrini & John B. Davis, 2024. "Today’s economics: one, no one and one hundred thousand," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 59-76, January.
    12. Cordier, Mateo & Pérez Agúndez, José A. & Hecq, Walter & Hamaide, Bertrand, 2014. "A guiding framework for ecosystem services monetization in ecological–economic modeling," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 86-96.
    13. Kurt W. Rothschild, 2007. "Einige Bemerkungen zum Thema Mainstream und Heterodoxie," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 33(4), pages 581-590.
    14. Christian Schnuelle & Timo Wassermann & Torben Stuehrmann, 2022. "Mind the Gap—A Socio-Economic Analysis on Price Developments of Green Hydrogen, Synthetic Fuels, and Conventional Energy Carriers in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Røpke, Inge, 2020. "Econ 101—In need of a sustainability transition," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    16. Beckenbach, Frank, 2019. "Monism in modern science: The case of (micro-)economics," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-49, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    17. Piergiuseppe Morone & Richard Taylor, 2011. "Knowledge Diffusion and Innovation: Modelling Complex Entrepreneurial Behaviours by Piergiuseppe Morone and Richard Taylor: A Response to the Review," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 14(2), pages 1-7.
    18. Christian Grimm & Jakob Kapeller & Stephan Puehringer, 2017. "Zum Profil der deutschsprachigen Volkswirtschaftslehre: Paradigmatische Ausrichtung und politische Orientierung deutschsprachiger Oekonom_innen (On the current state of German-speaking Economics: Para," ICAE Working Papers 70, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    19. Ötsch, Walter, 2020. "Wissen, Nichtwissen und falsches Wissen bei Hayek: Vom Wissensverlust der ökonomisierten Gesellschaft," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie 66, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    20. Fontana, Magda, 2010. "Can neoclassical economics handle complexity? The fallacy of the oil spot dynamic," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 584-596, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ökonomisches Denken; Narrativ-Theorie; Pluralismus; Ideologie; Wirtschaftswissenschaft; Marktfundamentalismus;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B10 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - General
    • N10 - Economic History - - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics; Industrial Structure; Growth; Fluctuations - - - General, International, or Comparative
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cuswps:60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hfgg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.