IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cfrwps/2210.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

One for the money, two for the show? The number of designated market makers and liquidity

Author

Listed:
  • Theissen, Erik
  • Westheide, Christian

Abstract

Prior research has established that the presence of designated market makers (DMMs) in an electronic open limit order book increases liquidity. We analyze whether the presence of additional DMMs results in a further improvement in liquidity. Using data from Deutsche Börse's Xetra system we find that increases in the number of DMMs significantly improve liquidity, and vice versa for decreases in the number of DMMs. Our results are confirmed when we use an instrumental variables approach to overcome potential endogeneity issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2022. "One for the money, two for the show? The number of designated market makers and liquidity," CFR Working Papers 22-10, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cfrwps:2210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/266416/1/182251245X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wahal, Sunil, 1997. "Entry, Exit, Market Makers, and the Bid-Ask Spread," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 10(3), pages 871-901.
    2. John Rust & George Hall, 2003. "Middlemen versus Market Makers: A Theory of Competitive Exchange," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 111(2), pages 353-403, April.
    3. Hendrik Bessembinder & Jia Hao & Kuncheng Zheng, 2020. "Liquidity Provision Contracts and Market Quality: Evidence from the New York Stock Exchange," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(1), pages 44-74.
    4. Heckman, James J, 1978. "Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(4), pages 931-959, July.
    5. Clark-Joseph, Adam D. & Ye, Mao & Zi, Chao, 2017. "Designated market makers still matter: Evidence from two natural experiments," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 652-667.
    6. Anand, Amber & Tanggaard, Carsten & Weaver, Daniel G., 2009. "Paying for Market Quality," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(6), pages 1427-1457, December.
    7. Perotti, Pietro & Rindi, Barbara, 2010. "Market makers as information providers: The natural experiment of STAR," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 895-917, December.
    8. Nimalendran, M. & Petrella, Giovanni, 2003. "Do 'thinly-traded' stocks benefit from specialist intervention?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 1823-1854, September.
    9. Johannes Atle Skjeltorp & Bernt Arne Ødegaard, 2015. "When Do Listed Firms Pay for Market Making in Their Own Stock?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 44(2), pages 241-266, June.
    10. Menkveld, Albert J. & Wang, Ting, 2013. "How do designated market makers create value for small-caps?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 571-603.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2023. "One for the money, two for the show? The number of designated market makers and liquidity," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2020. "Call of duty: Designated market maker participation in call auctions," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    3. Anand, Amber & Venkataraman, Kumar, 2016. "Market conditions, fragility, and the economics of market making," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 327-349.
    4. Clark-Joseph, Adam D. & Ye, Mao & Zi, Chao, 2017. "Designated market makers still matter: Evidence from two natural experiments," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 652-667.
    5. Hendershott, Terrence & Menkveld, Albert J., 2014. "Price pressures," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(3), pages 405-423.
    6. Pieter Gautier & Bo Hu & Makoto Watanabe, 2023. "Marketmaking Middlemen," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 54(1), pages 83-103, March.
    7. Petar-Pierre Matek & Maša Galiæ, 2024. "The impact of designated market-makers on liquidity in frontier markets: Evidence from Zagreb and Ljubljana Stock Exchanges," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 42(1), pages 95-121.
    8. Y. Peter Chung & S. Thomas Kim & Kenji Kutsuna & Richard L. Smith, 2020. "Which firms benefit from market making?," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 34(1), pages 33-63, March.
    9. Li, Jianhua & Xu, Jianxiang, 2023. "Does the introduction of market maker improve market quality? Evidence from China's Sci-Tech innovation board," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    10. Menkveld, Albert J. & Wang, Ting, 2013. "How do designated market makers create value for small-caps?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 571-603.
    11. Bellia, Mario & Pelizzon, Loriana & Subrahmanyam, Marti G. & Yuferova, Darya, 2020. "Designated Market Makers: Competition and Incentives," SAFE Working Paper Series 247, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2020.
    12. De Cesari, Amedeo & Espenlaub, Susanne & Khurshed, Arif, 2011. "Stock repurchases and treasury share sales: Do they stabilize price and enhance liquidity?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 1558-1579.
    13. Madureira, Leonardo & Underwood, Shane, 2008. "Information, sell-side research, and market making," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 105-126, November.
    14. Johannes Atle Skjeltorp & Bernt Arne Ødegaard, 2015. "When Do Listed Firms Pay for Market Making in Their Own Stock?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 44(2), pages 241-266, June.
    15. Kee H. Chung & Chairat Chuwonganant & Youngsoo Kim, 2022. "Preopening price indications and market quality: Evidence from NYSE Rule 48," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 45(2), pages 205-228, June.
    16. Aït-Sahalia, Yacine & Sağlam, Mehmet, 2024. "High frequency market making: The role of speed," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 239(2).
    17. Clapham, Benjamin & Gomber, Peter & Lausen, Jens & Panz, Sven, 2021. "Liquidity provider incentives in fragmented securities markets," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 16-38.
    18. Staglianò, Raffaele & La Rocca, Maurizio & Gerace, Dionigi, 2018. "The impact of ownership concentration and analyst coverage on market liquidity: Comparative evidence from an auction and a specialist market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 203-214.
    19. Mao, Wen & Pagano, Michael S., 2011. "Specialists as risk managers: The competition between intermediated and non-intermediated markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 51-66, January.
    20. Murphy Jun Jie Lee, 2013. "The Microstructure of Trading Processes on the Singapore Exchange," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 2-2013, January-A.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Designated market makers; Liquidity;

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cfrwps:2210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cfkoede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.