IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfinec/v126y2017i3p652-667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designated market makers still matter: Evidence from two natural experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Clark-Joseph, Adam D.
  • Ye, Mao
  • Zi, Chao

Abstract

Independent technological glitches forced two separate trading halts on different U.S. exchanges during the week of July 6, 2015. During each halt, all other exchanges remained open. We exploit exogenous variation provided by this unprecedented coincidence, in conjunction with a proprietary data set, to identify the causal impact of Designated Market Maker (DMM) participation on liquidity. When the voluntary liquidity providers on one exchange were removed, liquidity remained unchanged; when DMMs were removed, liquidity decreased market-wide. We find evidence consistent with the idea that these DMMs, despite facing only mild formal obligations, significantly improve liquidity in the modern electronic marketplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Clark-Joseph, Adam D. & Ye, Mao & Zi, Chao, 2017. "Designated market makers still matter: Evidence from two natural experiments," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 652-667.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:126:y:2017:i:3:p:652-667
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.09.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X17302337
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.09.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craig W. Holden & Stacey Jacobsen, 2014. "Liquidity Measurement Problems in Fast, Competitive Markets: Expensive and Cheap Solutions," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(4), pages 1747-1785, August.
    2. Panayides, Marios A., 2007. "Affirmative obligations and market making with inventory," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 513-542, November.
    3. Anand, Amber & Venkataraman, Kumar, 2016. "Market conditions, fragility, and the economics of market making," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 327-349.
    4. McInish, Thomas H & Wood, Robert A, 1992. "An Analysis of Intraday Patterns in Bid/Ask Spreads for NYSE Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 753-764, June.
    5. Anand, Amber & Tanggaard, Carsten & Weaver, Daniel G., 2009. "Paying for Market Quality," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(6), pages 1427-1457, December.
    6. Perotti, Pietro & Rindi, Barbara, 2010. "Market makers as information providers: The natural experiment of STAR," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 895-917, December.
    7. repec:bla:jfinan:v:59:y:2004:i:3:p:1235-1258 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Nimalendran, M. & Petrella, Giovanni, 2003. "Do 'thinly-traded' stocks benefit from specialist intervention?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 1823-1854, September.
    9. Jonathan Brogaard & Terrence Hendershott & Ryan Riordan, 2014. "High-Frequency Trading and Price Discovery," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 27(8), pages 2267-2306.
    10. Johannes Atle Skjeltorp & Bernt Arne Ødegaard, 2015. "When Do Listed Firms Pay for Market Making in Their Own Stock?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 44(2), pages 241-266, June.
    11. Hasbrouck, Joel, 1995. "One Security, Many Markets: Determining the Contributions to Price Discovery," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 50(4), pages 1175-1199, September.
    12. Venkataraman, Kumar & Waisburd, Andrew C., 2007. "The Value of the Designated Market Maker," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 735-758, September.
    13. Menkveld, Albert J. & Wang, Ting, 2013. "How do designated market makers create value for small-caps?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 571-603.
    14. Baillie, Richard T. & Geoffrey Booth, G. & Tse, Yiuman & Zabotina, Tatyana, 2002. "Price discovery and common factor models," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 309-321, July.
    15. Hendrik Bessembinder & Jia Hao & Kuncheng Zheng, 2015. "Market Making Contracts, Firm Value, and the IPO Decision," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 70(5), pages 1997-2028, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chung, Kee H. & Chuwonganant, Chairat, 2023. "COVID-19 pandemic and the stock market: Liquidity, price efficiency, and trading," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Clapham, Benjamin & Gomber, Peter & Lausen, Jens & Panz, Sven, 2021. "Liquidity provider incentives in fragmented securities markets," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 16-38.
    3. He, Qing & Gan, Jingyun & Wang, Shuwan & Chong, Terence Tai-Leung, 2019. "The effects of trading suspensions in China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    4. Li, Sida & Wang, Xin & Ye, Mao, 2021. "Who provides liquidity, and when?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 968-980.
    5. Joel Hasbrouck, 2021. "Price Discovery in High Resolution," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 395-430.
    6. Kerssenfischer, Mark & Helmus, Caspar, 2024. "Outages in sovereign bond markets," Working Paper Series 2944, European Central Bank.
    7. Brogaard, Jonathan & Carrion, Allen & Moyaert, Thibaut & Riordan, Ryan & Shkilko, Andriy & Sokolov, Konstantin, 2018. "High frequency trading and extreme price movements," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 253-265.
    8. Bogousslavsky, Vincent & Collin-Dufresne, Pierre & Sağlam, Mehmet, 2021. "Slow-moving capital and execution costs: Evidence from a major trading glitch," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 922-949.
    9. Li, Jianhua & Xu, Jianxiang, 2023. "Does the introduction of market maker improve market quality? Evidence from China's Sci-Tech innovation board," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    10. Kee H. Chung & Chairat Chuwonganant & Youngsoo Kim, 2022. "Preopening price indications and market quality: Evidence from NYSE Rule 48," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 45(2), pages 205-228, June.
    11. Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2020. "Call of duty: Designated market maker participation in call auctions," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    12. Bellia, Mario & Pelizzon, Loriana & Subrahmanyam, Marti G. & Yuferova, Darya, 2020. "Designated Market Makers: Competition and Incentives," SAFE Working Paper Series 247, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2020.
    13. Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2022. "One for the money, two for the show? The number of designated market makers and liquidity," CFR Working Papers 22-10, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    14. Sida Li & Xin Wang & Mao Ye, 2019. "Who Provides Liquidity, and When?," NBER Working Papers 25972, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Tripathi, Abhinava & Dixit, Alok & Vipul,, 2021. "Information content of order imbalance in an order-driven market: Indian Evidence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    16. Petar-Pierre Matek & Maša Galiæ, 2024. "The impact of designated market-makers on liquidity in frontier markets: Evidence from Zagreb and Ljubljana Stock Exchanges," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 42(1), pages 95-121.
    17. Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2023. "One for the money, two for the show? The number of designated market makers and liquidity," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    18. Zhenhua Chen & Adrienna Huffman & Gans Narayanamoorthy & Ruizhong Zhang, 2021. "Minimum tick size and analyst coverage: Evidence from the Tick Size Pilot Program," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3-4), pages 666-691, March.
    19. Anagnostidis, Panagiotis & Fontaine, Patrice, 2020. "Liquidity commonality and high frequency trading: Evidence from the French stock market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    20. Battalio, Robert & Jennings, Robert & McDonald, Bill, 2021. "Deviations from time priority on the NYSE," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    21. Eisl, Alexander & Ochs, Christian & Staghøj, Jonas & Subrahmanyam, Marti G., 2022. "Sovereign issuers, incentives and liquidity: The case of the Danish sovereign bond market," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    22. Ma, Rui & Anderson, Hamish D. & Marshall, Ben R., 2018. "Market volatility, liquidity shocks, and stock returns: Worldwide evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 164-199.
    23. Aït-Sahalia, Yacine & Sağlam, Mehmet, 2024. "High frequency market making: The role of speed," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 239(2).
    24. Burns, Christopher B. & Kane, Stephen, 2022. "Arbitrage breakdown in WTI crude oil futures: An analysis of the events on April 20, 2020," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anand, Amber & Venkataraman, Kumar, 2016. "Market conditions, fragility, and the economics of market making," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 327-349.
    2. Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2020. "Call of duty: Designated market maker participation in call auctions," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    3. Hendershott, Terrence & Menkveld, Albert J., 2014. "Price pressures," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(3), pages 405-423.
    4. Kee H. Chung & Chairat Chuwonganant & Youngsoo Kim, 2022. "Preopening price indications and market quality: Evidence from NYSE Rule 48," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 45(2), pages 205-228, June.
    5. Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2023. "One for the money, two for the show? The number of designated market makers and liquidity," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    6. Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2022. "One for the money, two for the show? The number of designated market makers and liquidity," CFR Working Papers 22-10, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    7. Menkveld, Albert J. & Wang, Ting, 2013. "How do designated market makers create value for small-caps?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 571-603.
    8. Pieter Gautier & Bo Hu & Makoto Watanabe, 2023. "Marketmaking Middlemen," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 54(1), pages 83-103, March.
    9. Jagjeev Dosanjh, 2017. "Exchange Initiatives and Market Efficiency: Evidence from the Australian Securities Exchange," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 1-2017, January-A.
    10. repec:uts:finphd:34 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Murphy Jun Jie Lee, 2013. "The Microstructure of Trading Processes on the Singapore Exchange," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 4, July-Dece.
    12. Y. Peter Chung & S. Thomas Kim & Kenji Kutsuna & Richard L. Smith, 2020. "Which firms benefit from market making?," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 34(1), pages 33-63, March.
    13. Murphy Jun Jie Lee, 2013. "The Microstructure of Trading Processes on the Singapore Exchange," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 2-2013, January-A.
    14. Bellia, Mario & Pelizzon, Loriana & Subrahmanyam, Marti G. & Yuferova, Darya, 2020. "Designated Market Makers: Competition and Incentives," SAFE Working Paper Series 247, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2020.
    15. De Cesari, Amedeo & Espenlaub, Susanne & Khurshed, Arif, 2011. "Stock repurchases and treasury share sales: Do they stabilize price and enhance liquidity?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 1558-1579.
    16. Chakrabarty, Bidisha & Pascual, Roberto, 2023. "Stock liquidity and algorithmic market making during the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    17. Korczak, Piotr & Phylaktis, Kate, 2010. "Related securities and price discovery: Evidence from NYSE-listed Non-U.S. stocks," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 566-584, September.
    18. Papavassiliou, Vassilios G. & Kinateder, Harald, 2021. "Information shares and market quality before and during the European sovereign debt crisis," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Petar-Pierre Matek & Maša Galiæ, 2024. "The impact of designated market-makers on liquidity in frontier markets: Evidence from Zagreb and Ljubljana Stock Exchanges," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 42(1), pages 95-121.
    20. Danny Lo, 2015. "Essays in Market Microstructure and Investor Trading," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 4-2015, January-A.
    21. Jagannathan, Ravi & Pelizzon, Loriana & Schaumburg, Ernst & Sherman, Mila Getmansky & Yuferova, Darya, 2022. "Recovery from fast crashes: Role of mutual funds," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Market makers; HFTs; Liquidity; Obligations; Trading halt;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:126:y:2017:i:3:p:652-667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505576 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.