IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfe/zbefri/v42y2024i1p95-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of designated market-makers on liquidity in frontier markets: Evidence from Zagreb and Ljubljana Stock Exchanges

Author

Listed:
  • Petar-Pierre Matek

    (EFFECTUS University of Applied Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Maša Galiæ

    (Raiffeisenbank Austria d.d., Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Many exchanges around the globe have implemented market-making schemes in an attempt to mitigate liquidity risk and enhance trading volume. This research examines the impact of designated market makers on stock liquidity in frontier markets, specifically measured by bid-ask spreads and trading turnover. Using a difference-in-differences analysis, we studied 19 stocks that introduced designated market makers at the Zagreb Stock Exchange and Ljubljana Stock Exchange between May 2010 and January 2022. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the impact of market makers in these specific markets and only the second in frontier markets overall. As expected, we find a significant reduction in bid-ask spreads for most stocks following the introduction of market makers. However, unlike findings of studies conducted in more developed markets, our results for turnover are not conclusive, suggesting that market makers alone may not be sufficient to overcome structural impediments to market liquidity in frontier markets, such as lack of free float and the dominance of large investors with long-term investment horizons.

Suggested Citation

  • Petar-Pierre Matek & Maša Galiæ, 2024. "The impact of designated market-makers on liquidity in frontier markets: Evidence from Zagreb and Ljubljana Stock Exchanges," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 42(1), pages 95-121.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfe:zbefri:v:42:y:2024:i:1:p:95-121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.efri.uniri.hr/upload/zbornik%201-2024/06-Matek_et_al-2024-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stereńczak, Szymon & Zaremba, Adam & Umar, Zaghum, 2020. "Is there an illiquidity premium in frontier markets?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    2. David Weild & Edward Kim & Lisa Newport, 2013. "Making Stock Markets Work to Support Economic Growth: Implications for Governments, Regulators, Stock Exchanges, Corporate Issuers and their Investors," OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers 10, OECD Publishing.
    3. Clark-Joseph, Adam D. & Ye, Mao & Zi, Chao, 2017. "Designated market makers still matter: Evidence from two natural experiments," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 652-667.
    4. Anand, Amber & Tanggaard, Carsten & Weaver, Daniel G., 2009. "Paying for Market Quality," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(6), pages 1427-1457, December.
    5. Clapham, Benjamin & Gomber, Peter & Lausen, Jens & Panz, Sven, 2021. "Liquidity provider incentives in fragmented securities markets," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 16-38.
    6. George Milunovich & Jelena Minović, 2014. "Local and global illiquidity effects in the Balkans frontier markets," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(31), pages 3861-3873, November.
    7. Chakrabarty, Bidisha & Pascual, Roberto, 2023. "Stock liquidity and algorithmic market making during the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    8. Venkataraman, Kumar & Waisburd, Andrew C., 2007. "The Value of the Designated Market Maker," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 735-758, September.
    9. Mingfa Ding & Sandy Suardi & Caihong Xu & Dong Zhang, 2022. "Large-caps liquidity provision, market liquidity and high-frequency market makers’ trading behaviour," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(16), pages 1621-1641, November.
    10. Menkveld, Albert J. & Wang, Ting, 2013. "How do designated market makers create value for small-caps?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 571-603.
    11. Foley, Sean & Kwan, Amy & Philip, Richard & Ødegaard, Bernt Arne, 2022. "Contagious margin calls: How COVID-19 threatened global stock market liquidity," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 59(PA).
    12. Priyanka Naik & Y. V. Reddy, 2021. "Stock Market Liquidity: A Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    13. Jelena Z. Minović & Boško R. Živković, 2010. "Open Issues In Testing Liquidity In Frontier Financial Markets: The Case Of Serbia," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 55(185), pages 33-62, April - J.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2020. "Call of duty: Designated market maker participation in call auctions," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    2. Bellia, Mario & Pelizzon, Loriana & Subrahmanyam, Marti G. & Yuferova, Darya, 2020. "Designated Market Makers: Competition and Incentives," SAFE Working Paper Series 247, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2020.
    3. Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2023. "One for the money, two for the show? The number of designated market makers and liquidity," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    4. Kee H. Chung & Chairat Chuwonganant & Youngsoo Kim, 2022. "Preopening price indications and market quality: Evidence from NYSE Rule 48," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 45(2), pages 205-228, June.
    5. Hendershott, Terrence & Menkveld, Albert J., 2014. "Price pressures," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(3), pages 405-423.
    6. Y. Peter Chung & S. Thomas Kim & Kenji Kutsuna & Richard L. Smith, 2020. "Which firms benefit from market making?," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 34(1), pages 33-63, March.
    7. Chung, Kee H. & Chuwonganant, Chairat, 2023. "COVID-19 pandemic and the stock market: Liquidity, price efficiency, and trading," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Iwanaga, Yasuhiro & Hirose, Takehide, 2022. "Liquidity shock and stock returns in the Japanese equity market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Pieter Gautier & Bo Hu & Makoto Watanabe, 2023. "Marketmaking Middlemen," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 54(1), pages 83-103, March.
    10. Anand, Amber & Venkataraman, Kumar, 2016. "Market conditions, fragility, and the economics of market making," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 327-349.
    11. Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2022. "One for the money, two for the show? The number of designated market makers and liquidity," CFR Working Papers 22-10, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    12. Clark-Joseph, Adam D. & Ye, Mao & Zi, Chao, 2017. "Designated market makers still matter: Evidence from two natural experiments," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 652-667.
    13. Panayi, Efstathios & Peters, Gareth W. & Danielsson, Jon & Zigrand, Jean-Pierre, 2018. "Designating market maker behaviour in limit order book markets," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 20-44.
    14. Johannes Atle Skjeltorp & Bernt Arne Ødegaard, 2015. "When Do Listed Firms Pay for Market Making in Their Own Stock?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 44(2), pages 241-266, June.
    15. Clapham, Benjamin & Gomber, Peter & Lausen, Jens & Panz, Sven, 2021. "Liquidity provider incentives in fragmented securities markets," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 16-38.
    16. Arman Abgaryan & Utkarsh Sharma & Joshua Tobkin, 2024. "Proof of Efficient Liquidity: A Staking Mechanism for Capital Efficient Liquidity," Papers 2401.04521, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    17. Jagannathan, Ravi & Pelizzon, Loriana & Schaumburg, Ernst & Sherman, Mila Getmansky & Yuferova, Darya, 2022. "Recovery from fast crashes: Role of mutual funds," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB).
    18. Menkveld, Albert J. & Wang, Ting, 2013. "How do designated market makers create value for small-caps?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 571-603.
    19. Mao, Wen & Pagano, Michael S., 2011. "Specialists as risk managers: The competition between intermediated and non-intermediated markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 51-66, January.
    20. Anand, Amber & Chakravarty, Sugato & Chuwonganant, Chairat, 2009. "Cleaning house: Stock reassignments on the NYSE," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 727-753, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    market making; designated market-makers; liquidity provision; frontier markets; market quality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfe:zbefri:v:42:y:2024:i:1:p:95-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Danijela Ujcic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efrijhr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.