IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/yor/hectdg/24-07.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Urban NO2 Pollution and Health Outcomes: Natural-Experiment Evidence on the Predicted Benefits of the EU Zero-Emission-Vehicles Resolution

Author

Listed:
  • Bondonio, D.;
  • Chirico, P.;
  • Piacenza, M.;
  • Robbiano, S.;

Abstract

In March 2023, the EU approved a zero-emission mobility resolution, which mandates zero CO2 emissions for all new vehicles by 2035. This measure has sparked a heated debate due to its uncertain effectiveness in reducing pollution and CO2 emissions globally. Nevertheless, the shift towards zero -emission vehicles has the potential to decrease local nitrogen dioxide (NO2) pollution, particularly in urban areas where air quality is a major concern for citizens’ health. This study investigates what may be the predicted impact of the EU zero-emission mobility policy on local NO2 levels, using the draconian stay-home provision of the Italian Covid-19 lockdown of early 2020 as a natural experiment which generated an exogenous fossil-fuel-traffic abatement that proxies the implementation of the resolution. We exploit datafrom the urban areas with elevated traffic density in the Po-river valley in Northern Italy, a region with the highest peaks of air-pollution in Europe, and we develop a novel intertemporal statistical matching approach which is uniquely suited for policy evaluations on air-quality outcomes in the context of multivariate time series data. The results from our causalinference analysis show that Covid -19 lockdown led to a mean NO2 reduction of 13.62 μg/m3 (around 53% from a baseline average level of 25.8 μg/m3). According to medical literature, this decline in NO2 translates into a reduction in the relative risk of total, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality of about 9%, 8%, and 4%, respectively. Moreover, we find a marked heterogeneity in the estimated impact of lockdown on pollution and health, with greater decreases in NO2 and in the relative risk of mortality observed for higher baseline pollution levels. These findings suggest that the EU 2035 resolution is indeed expected to improve local air quality and citizens’ health in urban areas with high traffic density. The estimated benefits, however, are likely to vary across EU regions based on prevailing local meteorological conditions and urban texture features, which determine a different baseline pollution, supporting the rationale for a spatial differentiation of the EU zero-emission mobility policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Bondonio, D.; & Chirico, P.; & Piacenza, M.; & Robbiano, S.;, 2024. "Urban NO2 Pollution and Health Outcomes: Natural-Experiment Evidence on the Predicted Benefits of the EU Zero-Emission-Vehicles Resolution," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 24/07, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
  • Handle: RePEc:yor:hectdg:24/07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/economics/documents/hedg/workingpapers/2024/2407.pdf
    File Function: Main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    air pollution; EU zero-emission mobility policy; urban areas; NO2 abatement; health effects; intertemporal statistical matching; impact heterogeneity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
    • R48 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government Pricing and Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:yor:hectdg:24/07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jane Rawlings (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deyoruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.