IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/yon/wpaper/2020rwp-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Testing for Structural Breaks in Return-Based Style Regression Models

Author

Listed:
  • Yunmi Kim

    (Univ of Seoul)

  • Douglas Stone

    (Allianz Global Investors)

  • Tae-Hwan Kim

    (Yonsei Univ)

Abstract

It is important for investors to know not only the style of a fund manager in whom they are interested, but also whether this style is constant or changing through time. The style is now easily identified by the so-called style regression. However, there has been no formal and statistically valid method to test for a change in manager style when the two typically imposed restrictions (sum-to-one and non-negativity) are jointly present in style analysis. In this study, we apply and extend the results of Andrews (1997a, 1997b, 1999, 2000) to develop a valid testing procedure for the possibility wherein the location of any possible change does not need to be specified and the case of multiple shifts is accommodated. When our proposed test is applied to the Fidelity Magellan Fund, it is revealed that the fund’s style changed at least twice between 1988 and 2017.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunmi Kim & Douglas Stone & Tae-Hwan Kim, 2020. "Testing for Structural Breaks in Return-Based Style Regression Models," Working papers 2020rwp-165, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:yon:wpaper:2020rwp-165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://121.254.254.220/repec/yon/wpaper/2020rwp-165.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laurens Swinkels & Pieter Van Der Sluis, 2006. "Return-based style analysis with time-varying exposures," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(6-7), pages 529-552.
    2. Darolles, Serge & Vaissié, Mathieu, 2012. "The alpha and omega of fund of hedge fund added value," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1067-1078.
    3. Donald W. K. Andrews, 2000. "Inconsistency of the Bootstrap when a Parameter Is on the Boundary of the Parameter Space," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 399-406, March.
    4. Jan Annaert & Geert Van Campenhout, 2007. "Time Variation in Mutual Fund Style Exposures," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 11(4), pages 633-661.
    5. Jushan Bai & Pierre Perron, 1998. "Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 47-78, January.
    6. Bai, Jushan, 1997. "Estimating Multiple Breaks One at a Time," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 315-352, June.
    7. ter Horst, Jenke R. & Nijman, Theo E. & de Roon, Frans A., 2004. "Evaluating style analysis," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 29-53, January.
    8. Andrews, Donald W K, 1993. "Tests for Parameter Instability and Structural Change with Unknown Change Point," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 821-856, July.
    9. Tae-Hwan Kim, 2005. "Asymptotic and Bayesian Confidence Intervals for Sharpe-Style Weights," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(3), pages 315-343.
    10. Donald W.K. Andrews, 1997. "Estimation When a Parameter Is on a Boundary: Theory and Applications," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1153, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    11. Donald W. K. Andrews, 1999. "Estimation When a Parameter Is on a Boundary," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 67(6), pages 1341-1384, November.
    12. Reinaldo Marques & Adrian Pizzinga & Luciano Vereda, 2012. "Restricted Kalman filter applied to dynamic style analysis of actuarial funds," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 558-570, November.
    13. Serge Darolles & Mathieu Vaissié, 2012. "The alpha and omega of fund of hedge fund added value," Post-Print halshs-00677718, HAL.
    14. Kim, Moon & Shukla, Ravi & Tomas, Michael, 2000. "Mutual fund objective misclassification," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 309-323.
    15. Jushan Bai & Pierre Perron, 2003. "Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 1-22.
    16. ANNAERT, Jan & VAN CAMPENHOUT, Geert, 2002. "Style breaks in return-based style analysis," Working Papers 2002019, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    17. Ter Horst, J.R. & Nijman, T.E. & de Roon, F.A., 2004. "Evaluating style analysis," Other publications TiSEM 8a501733-7a06-4399-8a43-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Laurent Bodson & Alain Coën & Georges Hübner, 2010. "Dynamic Hedge Fund Style Analysis With Errors‐In‐Variables," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 33(3), pages 201-221, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Siranova & Menbere Workie Tiruneh, 2016. "The determinants of errors and omissions in a small and open economy: The case of Slovakia," Working Papers wp73, Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, revised 08 Apr 2016.
    2. Wang‐Sheng Lee & Sandy Suardi, 2010. "The Australian Firearms Buyback And Its Effect On Gun Deaths," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 28(1), pages 65-79, January.
    3. Alessandro Casini & Pierre Perron, 2018. "Structural Breaks in Time Series," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series WP2019-02, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    4. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2014-060 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Travaglini, Guido, 2007. "The U.S. Dynamic Taylor Rule With Multiple Breaks, 1984-2001," MPRA Paper 3419, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2007.
    6. Abhijit Sharma & Kelvin G Balcombe & Iain M Fraser, 2009. "Non-renewable resource prices: Structural breaks and long term trends," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(2), pages 805-819.
    7. Cai, Lili & Swanson, Norman R., 2011. "In- and out-of-sample specification analysis of spot rate models: Further evidence for the period 1982-2008," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 743-764, September.
    8. Venkata Jandhyala & Stergios Fotopoulos & Ian MacNeill & Pengyu Liu, 2013. "Inference for single and multiple change-points in time series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 423-446, July.
    9. Chengsi Zhang & Denise R. Osborn & Dong Heon Kim, 2008. "The New Keynesian Phillips Curve: From Sticky Inflation to Sticky Prices," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(4), pages 667-699, June.
    10. Andrew Mason & Frank McGroarty & Steve Thomas, 2012. "Style analysis for diversified US equity funds," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(3), pages 170-185, June.
    11. Miljkovic, Dragan & Dalbec, Nathan & Zhang, Lei, 2016. "Estimating dynamics of US demand for major fossil fuels," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 284-291.
    12. Laurens Swinkels & Pieter Van Der Sluis, 2006. "Return-based style analysis with time-varying exposures," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(6-7), pages 529-552.
    13. Richard Bluhm & Denis de Crombrugghe & Adam Szirmai, 0. "Do Weak Institutions Prolong Crises? On the Identification, Characteristics, and Duration of Declines during Economic Slumps," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 34(3), pages 810-832.
    14. Steven Salaga & Rodney Fort, 2017. "Structural Change in Competitive Balance in Big-Time College Football," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 50(1), pages 27-41, February.
    15. Mahua Barari & Nityananda Sarkar & Srikanta Kundu & Kushal Banik Chowdhury, 2014. "Forecasting House Prices in the United States with Multiple Structural Breaks," International Econometric Review (IER), Econometric Research Association, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Michail, Nektarios A. & Melas, Konstantinos D. & Cleanthous, Lena, 2022. "The relationship between shipping freight rates and inflation in the Euro Area," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 40-49.
    17. Korbinian von Blanckenburg, Gerrit Reher, "undated". "Testverfahren zur Beurteilung der Funktionsfähigkeit von Marktprozessen," Working Papers 201154, Institute of Spatial and Housing Economics, Munster Universitary.
    18. Gómez-Puig, Marta & Sosvilla-Rivero, Simón, 2014. "Causality and contagion in EMU sovereign debt markets," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-27.
    19. J. Hoyo & G. Llorente & C. Rivero, 2019. "Testing for Constant Parameters in Nonlinear Models: A Quick Procedure with an Empirical Illustration," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 113-137, June.
    20. Elena Andreou & Eric Ghysels, 2002. "Detecting multiple breaks in financial market volatility dynamics," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(5), pages 579-600.
    21. Eksi, Ozan & Gurdal, Mehmet Y. & Orman, Cuneyt, 2017. "Fines versus prison for the issuance of bad checks: Evidence from a policy shift in Turkey," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 9-27.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Structural Shift; Boundary Parameter; Maximum Chow Test; Style Regression;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:yon:wpaper:2020rwp-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: YERI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eryonkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.