IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/iasawp/rr98003.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Three Scenarios for Land-Use Change: A Case Study in Central Europe

Author

Listed:
  • S. Prieler
  • A.P. Lesko
  • S. Anderberg

Abstract

The study presented in this paper is part of the Regional Material Balance Approaches to Long-Term Evironmental Policy Planning Project at IIASA. This project aims at studying the flow of four heavy metals (cadmium, zinc, lead, and arsenic) with particular focus on soils. The combination of load, soil characteristics, land use, and land management, including plant types grown and agrochemical applications, determines the fate of stored heavy metals. Heavy metals may further accumulate in the soil or they may be remobilized and enter the food chain via plant uptake or via groundwater. Land use and land management have an impact on the load of heavy metals because certain agrochemical inputs (phosphate fertilizers, sewage sludge, manure) contain heavy metals as impurities. Certain land-management practices also influence the soil characteistics that determine whether heavy metals accumulate or are available in their mobile form. The proect area includes the northern part of the Czech Republic (Bohemia and Moravia), southwesern Poland (Upper and Lower Silesia), and most of former East Germany (Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt, Brandenburg, and Thueringen). The project area covers about 180,000 sq. km, parts of which are highly industrialized and densely populated. Extensive atmospheric impact of pollutants from coal burning and other industrial activities has resulted in chemical deterioration of soils. Heavy metals have accumulated in the soils over the past few centuries. In spite of this pollution in certain areas, the project area as a whole is important for agricultural production, with half of its land use devoted to agriculture. In 1992, utilized agricultural area (UAA) accounted for 10 million hectares (54% of total land area), with nearly two-thirds of UAA used as arable land and the remainder used as as grassland or meadows. Six million hectares (32%) are covered by forest and the remaining 2.5 million hectares (14%) fall into the category "other land," which consists mainly of urban and mining land. Land-use scenarios have been developed to help assess possible effects of accumulated heavy-metal pollution in the region. Because future land use and agriculture are highly uncertain, we have developed three radically different scenarios, all of which are possible but not equally probable. The first scenario (increase in wooded area) anticipates liberalization and abolition of subsidies in the agricultural sector and increases in demand that are too small to enable farmland in marginal areas to remain competitive. Large areas will be taken out of production and turned into forest or used for other nonagricultural purposes. Scenario 2 (alternative agricultural products) assumes a shift from food roduction to nonfood production, mainly biofuel, and incentives for extensification of agricultural production. The third scenario (Europe as food exporter) foresees increasing demand and rising world market prices for agricultural products, triggered by increasing wealth combined with environmental constraints in China and Southeast Asia. This paper describes these three scenarios, which were constructed for the period 1995-2050. Section 2 presents the factors that influence land-use development and describes historical land-use changes in Europe and the countries of the project area. Developmensts in the agricultural sector, which are considered to be of particular importance for land-use changes in the European context, are discussed in Section 3. The discussion includes recent developments in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Germany, but also trends in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union (EU) and possible impacts of global agricultural markets on European agriculture. Section 4 presents a general introduction to scenario construction; introduces the goals and key questions for the three scenarios constructed for the project area of this study; and presents, discusses, and compares the three scenarios. Conclusions are presented in Section 5.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Prieler & A.P. Lesko & S. Anderberg, 1998. "Three Scenarios for Land-Use Change: A Case Study in Central Europe," Working Papers rr98003, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:iasawp:rr98003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Publications/Documents/RR-98-003.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Publications/Documents/RR-98-003.ps
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Babcock, Bruce A. & Beghin, John C. & Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & de Cara, Stephane & Elobeid, Amani E. & Fang, Cheng & Fuller, Frank H. & Hart, Chad E. & Isik, Murat & Matthey, Holger & Saak, Alexander E. , 2002. "FAPRI 2002 World Agricultural Outlook," FAPRI Staff Reports 32051, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI).
    2. Babcock, Bruce A. & Beghin, John C. & Mohanty, Samarendu & Fuller, Frank H. & Chaudhary, Sudhir & Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Kovarik, Karen & Hart, Chad E. & Fang, Cheng & Kaus, Phillip J. & Naik, Manta & , 1999. "FAPRI 1999 World Agricultural Outlook," FAPRI Staff Reports 32050, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Qadeer ul Hussnain & Abdul Waheed & Khydija Wakil & Christopher James Pettit & Ejaz Hussain & Malik Asghar Naeem & Ghulam Abbas Anjum, 2020. "Shaping up the Future Spatial Plans for Urban Areas in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Dabo Guan & Terry Barker, 2012. "Low-carbon development in the least developed region: a case study of Guangyuan, Sichuan province, southwest China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 62(2), pages 243-254, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koo, Won W. & Taylor, Richard D., 1999. "Outlook Of The World Rice Industry Under Alternative Trade Liberalization Policies In Japan And Korea," Agricultural Economics Reports 23402, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    2. A. Ali Koc & Darnell B. Smith & Frank H. Fuller, 1998. "Turkish Agricultural Policy Analysis Model, The," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 98-tr42, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    3. Jacinto F. Fabiosa, 1999. "General Conceptual Approach to Modeling the Livestock Sector: Application to the Japanese Swine-Pork Sector Model with Analysis of the," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 99-tr43, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    4. Jacinto F. Fabiosa, 1999. "General Conceptual Approach to Modeling the Livestock Sector: Application to the Japanese Swine-Pork Sector Model with Analysis of the," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 99-tr43, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    5. Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Ukhova, Yekaterina S., 2000. "New Aggregate And Source Specific Pork Import Demand Elasticity For Japan: Implications To U.S. Exports," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21743, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. A. Ali Koc & Darnell B. Smith & Frank H. Fuller, 1998. "Turkish Agricultural Policy Analysis Model, The," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 98-tr42, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    7. Chantal Le Mouël, 1999. "Élargissement à l'Est et négociations commerciales internationales : quelle marge de manœuvre pour la PAC ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 329(1), pages 35-54.
    8. Chad Barrett & Jacinto F. Fabiosa, 1998. "Policy Model for the Livestock and Poultry Sectors of Mexico, A," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 98-tr39, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    9. A. Ali Koc, 1999. "Acreage Allocation Model Estimation and Policy Evaluations for Major Crops in Turkey," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 99-wp220, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    10. Frank H. Fuller & Jacinto F. Fabiosa & V. Premakumar, 1997. "World Trade Impacts of Foot and Mouth Disease in Taiwan," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 97-bp16, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    11. Robert W. Ackrill, 2003. "EU Enlargement, the CAP and the Cost of Direct Payments: A Note," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 73-78, March.
    12. Huan-Niemi, Ellen & Niemi, Jyrki S., 2002. "The Next WTO Round on Agriculture and EU Enlargement: Pressures on the EU Dairy Sector," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24838, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Heckelei, Thomas & Krebs, Elvira & Mollmann, Claus & von Lampe, Martin, 1998. "Comparative Analysis of World Market Projections with Special Regard to Wheat Prices," Discussion Papers 18778, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    14. Kaoru YAMAGUCHI, . "Study on ASIAN Potential of Biofuel Market," Books, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), number 2013-rpr-20 edited by Kaoru YAMAGUCHI, July.
    15. Sergio H. Lence & Dermot J. Hayes, 2002. "U.S. Farm Policy and the Volatility of Commodity Prices and Farm Revenues," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(2), pages 335-351.
    16. Amanor-Boadu, Vincent & Hobbs, Jill E. & Kruja, Zana & Martin, Larry J., 1999. "Net Benefits Of Increased Trade Liberalization To The Canadian Economy," Miscellaneous Publications 18089, George Morris Center.
    17. Pardey, Philip G. & Beddow, Jason M. & Hurley, Terrance M. & Beatty, Timothy K.M. & Eidman, Vernon R., 2014. "The International Agricultural Prospects Model: Assessing Consumption and Production Futures Through 2050 (version 2.1)," Staff Papers 182192, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    18. Chad Barrett & Jacinto F. Fabiosa, 1998. "Policy Model for the Livestock and Poultry Sectors of Mexico, A," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 98-tr39, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    19. Schierhorn, Florian & Müller, Daniel & Prishchepov, Alexander V. & Faramarzi, Monireh & Balmann, Alfons, 2014. "The potential of Russia to increase its wheat production through cropland expansion and intensification," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3(3-4), pages 133-141.
    20. A. Ali Koc, 1999. "Acreage Allocation Model Estimation and Policy Evaluations for Major Crops in Turkey," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 99-wp220, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:iasawp:rr98003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiasaat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.