IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/1172.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Liberalizing Indian agriculture : an agenda for reform

Author

Listed:
  • Pursell, Garry
  • Gulati, Ashok

Abstract

In July 1991, India embarked on a program of economic decontrol that greatly speeded the previously slow process of liberalizing trade and domestic regulatory controls begun in 1978. But the focus of reform has been on manufacturing. Reform has barely touched agriculture, which accounts for two-thirds of employment in India and about 30 percent of India's GDP. Although some crops (notably oilseeds) receive heavy protection, the net effect of interventions to date is to heavily favor manufacturing over agriculture. In this agenda for reform, the authors offer recommendations: Remove all quantitative export and import controls on agriculture, except for special treatment (such as export taxes) when Indian exports would be substantial enough to depress world prices (most likely with rice). Further reduce protection on manufacturing, rather than bring protection for agriculture up to the same level. As a transitional measure, consider the use of variable tariffs based on weighted averages of past international prices as a way to partly insulate domestic prices from extreme fluctuations in world prices. Initially allow the export only of high quality high priced varieties of such commodities as cotton and rice, to limit upward pressures on domestic prices of lower quality varieties, which are important to consumption in low income Indian households. Liberalizing fertilizingr imports and deregulating domestic manufacturing and the distribution of fertilizingrs. Remove subsidies on irrigations, electricity, and credit (and create conditions to facilitate the trading of canal irrigation water rights). Deregulate the wheat, rice, oil and oilseed industries, and abolish compulsory government acquisition at below market prices of sugar, molasses, and milled rice. Reform the food security system to protect low income groups from the increase in the general level of food prices required by the liberalization of agriculture. This would involve better targeting of food subsidies and associated reforms of the public distribution system, or even its eventual replacement by a food stamp system.

Suggested Citation

  • Pursell, Garry & Gulati, Ashok, 1993. "Liberalizing Indian agriculture : an agenda for reform," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1172, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1993/09/01/000009265_3961005051901/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antônio Salazar P. Brandão & Will J. Martin, 1993. "Implications of agricultural trade liberalization for the developing countries," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 8(4), pages 313-343, June.
    2. Gulati, Ashok, 1990. "Fertiliser Subsidy: Is the Cultivator 'Net Subsidised?'," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 45(1), January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Independent Evaluation Group, 2006. "Assessing World Bank Support for Trade, 1987-2004 : An IEG Evaluation," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6966.
    2. Soumik Sarkar & Anjan Chakrabarti, 2022. "Rethinking the Formation of Public Distribution System: A Class-Focused Approach," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 26-43, March.
    3. Ajit Karnik, 2005. "Why Do Governments Lack “Political Will†? An Explanation," Working Papers id:102, eSocialSciences.
    4. K. C. Smitha, 2018. "Agrarian Movements in Neoliberal India: A Case Study of Andhra Pradesh Vyvasaya Vruthidarula Union," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 7(2), pages 123-144, August.
    5. Singh, Nirvikar, 2010. "The Dynamics and Status of India’s Economic Reforms," MPRA Paper 24479, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Parikh, Kirit S. & Narayana, N. S. S. & Panda, Manoj & Kumar, A. Ganesh, 1997. "Agricultural trade liberalization: growth, welfare and large country effects," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Faruquee, Rashid, 1995. "Government's role in Pakistan agriculture : major reforms are needed," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1468, The World Bank.
    8. Alagh, Y. K., 2022. "Covid and the Agricultural Rural Economy," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 0(Number 1), March.
    9. Kalirajan, K. P. & Sankar, U., 2001. "Agriculture in India's economic reform program," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 383-399.
    10. Gopinath, Munisamy & Laborde, David, 2008. "Implications for India of the May 2008 Draft Agricultural Modalities," WTO Doha Round 320118, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).
    11. Faruqee, Rashid, 1995. "Pakistan's agriculture sector : is 3 to 4 percent annual growth sustainable?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1407, The World Bank.
    12. Storm, Servaas, 1997. "Agriculture under trade policy reform: A quantitative assessment for India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 425-436, March.
    13. Harriss-White, Barbara, 1995. "The changing public role in services to food and agriculture : The legal regulation of food markets in India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 585-596, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Schure & G. Cornelis van Kooten & Yichuan Wang, 2007. "Challenges for Less Developed Countries: Agricultural Policies in the EU and the US," Working Papers 2007-08, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    2. A. Vaidyanathan, 2022. "Fertilizers use in Indian agriculture," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 24(1), pages 6-21, December.
    3. Francisco J. Castellano-Álvarez & Francisco M. Parejo-Moruno & J. Francisco Rangel-Preciado & Esteban Cruz-Hidalgo, 2021. "Regulation of Agricultural Trade and Its Implications in the Reform of the CAP. The Continental Products Case Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Adam Blake & Andrew McKay & Oliver Morrissey, 2002. "The Impact on Uganda of Agricultural Trade Liberalisation," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 365-381, July.
    5. Abler, David G. & Sukhatme, Vasant, 1991. "Indian Agricultural Price Policy Revisited," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271262, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Storm, Servaas, 1997. "Agriculture under trade policy reform: A quantitative assessment for India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 425-436, March.
    7. Peter G. Warr & Helal Ahammad, 1997. "Food aid, food policy and the Uruguay round: implications for Bangladesh," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(3), pages 169-185, January.
    8. De Silva, Nirodha & Malaga, Jaime E. & Johnson, Jeffrey W., 2013. "Trade Liberalization Effects On Agricultural Production Growth: The Case Of Sri Lanka," 2013 Annual Meeting, February 2-5, 2013, Orlando, Florida 143106, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    9. Safadi, Raed & Laird, Sam, 1996. "The Uruguay Round agreements: Impact on developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 1223-1242, July.
    10. Anderson, Kym & Martin, William J. & Valenzuela, Ernesto, 2007. "Long Run Implications of WTO Accession for Agriculture in China," 2007: China's Agricultural Trade: Issues and Prospects Symposium, July 2007, Beijing, China 55025, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    11. Sébastien Mary, 2019. "Hungry for free trade? Food trade and extreme hunger in developing countries," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(2), pages 461-477, April.
    12. Servaas Storm, 2003. "Transition Problems in Policy Reform: Agricultural Trade Liberalization in India," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(3), pages 406-418, August.
    13. teixeira, Erly Cardoso, 1998. "Impact of the Uruguay Round Agreement and Mercosul on the Brazilian Economy," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 52(3), July.
    14. Alston, Julian M. & Chalfant, James A. & Pardey, Philip G., 1993. "Structural Adjustment In Oecd Agriculture: Government Policies And Technical Change," Working Papers 14473, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    15. Brandão, Antônio Salazar P. & Lopes, Mauro de Rezende & Pereira, Lia Valls, 1995. "The Impacts of MERCOSUR on Brazil," 1995: Economic Integration in the Western Hemisphere Symposium, June 7-9, 1995, San Jose, Costa Rica 50816, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    16. Mary, Sébastien, 2018. "Does Agricultural (Food) Trade Openness Reduce Child Stunting?," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274282, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Ingco, Merlinda D., 1997. "Has agricultural trade liberalization improved welfare in the least-developed countries? Yes," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1748, The World Bank.
    18. Shah, Deepak, 2021. "Central Government Agricultural Subsidies in India: Public Sector Expenditure, Issues and Policy Implications," 2021 ASAE 10th International Conference (Virtual), January 11-13, Beijing, China 329399, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
    19. Pursell, Garry & Gupta, Anju, 1998. "Trade policies and incentives in Indian agriculture : methodology, background statistics, and protection and incentive indicators, 1965-95," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1953, The World Bank.
    20. DeRosa, Dean A., 1996. "The Uruguay Round Agreement On Agriculture And The International Trade Of Sub-Saharan Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 35(2), June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.