IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vuw/vuwecf/21060.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analytic Valuation of GMDB Options with Utility Based Asset Allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Ulm, Eric

Abstract

A number of analytic solutions have been found for Variable Annuity Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit (GMDB) option values under a variety of mortality laws. To date, the solutions are for Risk-Neutral valuation only. Where policyholder decisions are allowed, it is assumed that they act to maximize the risk-neutral value of the GMDB. We examine situations where the asset allocation decisions are made to maximize expected utility rather than option value. We find analytic solutions for both return of premium and ratchet options at small values of bequest motive for a number of mortality laws.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulm, Eric, 2020. "Analytic Valuation of GMDB Options with Utility Based Asset Allocation," Working Paper Series 21060, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    • Handle: RePEc:vuw:vuwecf:21060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/21060
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulm, Eric R., 2014. "Analytic solution for ratchet guaranteed minimum death benefit options under a variety of mortality laws," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 14-23.
    2. Ulm, Eric R., 2008. "Analytic Solution for Return of Premium and Rollup Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit Options Under Some Simple Mortality Laws," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(2), pages 543-563, November.
    3. Gao, Jin & Ulm, Eric R., 2015. "Optimal allocation and consumption with guaranteed minimum death benefits, external income and term life insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 87-98.
    4. Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Yang, Hailiang, 2013. "Valuing equity-linked death benefits in jump diffusion models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 615-623.
    5. Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Yang, Hailiang, 2012. "Valuing equity-linked death benefits and other contingent options: A discounted density approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 73-92.
    6. Gao, Jin & Ulm, Eric R., 2012. "Optimal consumption and allocation in variable annuities with Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 586-598.
    7. Eric R. Ulm, 2006. "The Effect of the Real Option to Transfer on the Value of Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 73(1), pages 43-69, March.
    8. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang, Xiaoqing & Tsai, Cary Chi-Liang & Lu, Yi, 2016. "Valuing guaranteed equity-linked contracts under piecewise constant forces of mortality," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 150-161.
    2. Wang, Yayun & Zhang, Zhimin & Yu, Wenguang, 2021. "Pricing equity-linked death benefits by complex Fourier series expansion in a regime-switching jump diffusion model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 399(C).
    3. Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Yang, Hailiang, 2015. "Geometric stopping of a random walk and its applications to valuing equity-linked death benefits," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 313-325.
    4. Wenguang Yu & Yaodi Yong & Guofeng Guan & Yujuan Huang & Wen Su & Chaoran Cui, 2019. "Valuing Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits by Cosine Series Expansion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Yaodi Yong & Hailiang Yang, 2021. "Valuation of Cliquet-Style Guarantees with Death Benefits in Jump Diffusion Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Kirkby, J. Lars & Nguyen, Duy, 2021. "Equity-linked Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits with dollar cost averaging," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 408-428.
    7. Ulm, Eric R., 2014. "Analytic solution for ratchet guaranteed minimum death benefit options under a variety of mortality laws," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 14-23.
    8. Ulm, Eric, 2020. "Analytic Valuation of GMDB Options with Utility Based Asset Allocation," Working Paper Series 8566, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    9. Moenig, Thorsten, 2021. "Variable annuities: Market incompleteness and policyholder behavior," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 63-78.
    10. Feng, Runhuan & Shimizu, Yasutaka, 2016. "Applications of central limit theorems for equity-linked insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 138-148.
    11. Gan, Guojun & Lin, X. Sheldon, 2015. "Valuation of large variable annuity portfolios under nested simulation: A functional data approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 138-150.
    12. Runhuan Feng & Xiaochen Jing & Jan Dhaene, 2015. "Comonotonic Approximations of Risk Measures for Variable Annuity Guaranteed Benefits with Dynamic Policyholder Behavior," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-008/IV/DSF85, Tinbergen Institute.
    13. Kokou Essiomle & Franck Adékambi, 2023. "Valuation of Equity-Linked Death Benefits on Two Lives with Dependence," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, January.
    14. Gao, Jin & Ulm, Eric R., 2015. "Optimal allocation and consumption with guaranteed minimum death benefits, external income and term life insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 87-98.
    15. Zhou, Jiang & Wu, Lan, 2015. "The time of deducting fees for variable annuities under the state-dependent fee structure," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 125-134.
    16. Yichen Han & Dongchen Li & Kun Fan & Jiaxin Wan & Luyan Li, 2024. "Valuation of a Mixture of GMIB and GMDB Variable Annuity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    17. Søren Asmussen & Patrick J. Laub & Hailiang Yang, 2019. "Phase-Type Models in Life Insurance: Fitting and Valuation of Equity-Linked Benefits," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Seyed Amir Hejazi & Kenneth R. Jackson & Guojun Gan, 2017. "A Spatial Interpolation Framework for Efficient Valuation of Large Portfolios of Variable Annuities," Papers 1701.04134, arXiv.org.
    19. Jennifer Alonso Garcia & Samuel Thirurajah & Jonathan Ziveyi, 2024. "A hybrid variable annuity contract embedded with living and death benefit riders," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/385588, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Kevin Maritato & Morton Lane & Matthew Murphy & Stan Uryasev, 2022. "Optimal Allocation of Retirement Portfolios," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vuw:vuwecf:21060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library Technology Services (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/egvuwnz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.