IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vua/wpaper/2009-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bringing is innovation in a highly-regulated environment: a collective action perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Rukanova, B.

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Econometrie (Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics Sciences, Business Administration and Economitrics)

  • Henriksen, H.Z.
  • Stijn, E. van
  • Tan, Y.H.

Abstract

The main question addressed in this paper is how to bring IS innovation in a highly regulated environment. The major challenge is that in domains that are highly regulated (such as Customs, Energy, and Healthcare), legal requirements often hinder the innovation process and the subsequent adoption of innovation. While adoption and diffusion of innovation has been the subject of extensive discussion in the context of IS, theories predominantly follow the rational positivistic perspective, focussing on variables which can predict the rate of diffusion and adoption. Such approaches remain static and fail to capture the complex social processes that would need to be mobilized to bring the desired change. Moreover, they do not pay specific attention to existing regulatory regimes that may need to be changed to create grounds for the further adoption of the innovation. To address these limitations, we apply the collective action model for institutional innovation (Hargrave and Van de Ven, 2006). Through our interpretive case study from the domain of eCustoms we are able to demonstrate the applicability of this alternative model to explain IS innovation, by showing how processes such as framing contests, mobilization of networks, utilization of political opportunities and engagement in collective action processes form an integral part of the institutional innovation process. The contribution of this paper is as follows. First of all, we apply a highly conceptual model borrowed from the organizational science field to analyse a real life case. We demonstrate the applicability of this model to explain processes of bringing IS innovation in a highly regulated context (eCustoms). By doing so, we contribute a new perspective for analyzing IS innovation, which can be seen as

Suggested Citation

  • Rukanova, B. & Henriksen, H.Z. & Stijn, E. van & Tan, Y.H., 2009. "Bringing is innovation in a highly-regulated environment: a collective action perspective," Serie Research Memoranda 0012, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    • Handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:2009-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://degree.ubvu.vu.nl/repec/vua/wpaper/pdf/20090012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew M. Pettigrew, 1990. "Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 267-292, August.
    2. John Child & Chris Smith, 1987. "The Context And Process Of Organizational Transformation ‐ Cadbury Limited In Its Sector," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 565-593, November.
    3. E. Burton Swanson, 1994. "Information Systems Innovation Among Organizations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(9), pages 1069-1092, September.
    4. John Leslie King & Vijay Gurbaxani & Kenneth L. Kraemer & F. Warren McFarlan & K. S. Raman & C. S. Yap, 1994. "Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 139-169, June.
    5. Randolph B. Cooper & Robert W. Zmud, 1990. "Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 123-139, February.
    6. James C. Brancheau & James C. Wetherbe, 1990. "The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 115-143, June.
    7. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 1992. "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 398-427, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boriana Rukanova & Mark Reuver & Stefan Henningsson & Fatemeh Nikayin & Yao-Hua Tan, 2020. "Emergence of collective digital innovations through the process of control point driven network reconfiguration and reframing: the case of mobile payment," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 107-129, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert G. Fichman, 2004. "Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 132-154, June.
    2. BarNir, Anat & Gallaugher, John M. & Auger, Pat, 2003. "Business process digitization, strategy, and the impact of firm age and size: the case of the magazine publishing industry," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 789-814, November.
    3. Premkumar, G. & Roberts, Margaret, 1999. "Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 467-484, August.
    4. Pradeep Racherla & Munir Mandviwalla, 2013. "Moving from Access to Use of the Information Infrastructure: A Multilevel Sociotechnical Framework," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 709-730, September.
    5. Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Youngjin Yoo, 2007. "Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 631-647, August.
    6. Kevin Zhu & Kenneth L. Kraemer, 2005. "Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 61-84, March.
    7. Teng, James TC & Fiedler, Kirk D & Grover, Varun, 1998. "An exploratory study of the influence of the IS function and organizational context on business process reengineering project initiatives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 679-698, December.
    8. Yang Liu & Moses Olabhele Esangbedo & Sijun Bai, 2019. "Adaptability of Inter-Organizational Information Systems Based on Organizational Identity: Some Factors of Partnership for the Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Khuong, Le-Nguyen & Harindranath, G. & Dyerson, Romano, 2014. "Understanding knowledge management software-organisation misalignments from an institutional perspective: A case study of a global IT-management consultancy firm," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 226-247.
    10. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Nathalie Mitev & Matthew Smith & Isabelle Walsh, 2017. "Renewing Literature Reviews in MIS Research? A Critical Realist Approach," Working Papers hal-01648133, HAL.
    11. Scott, Susan V., 1999. "The emergence of electronic trading in global financial markets: envisioning the role of futures exchanges in the next millennium," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 37872, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Henri Barki & Ryad Titah & Céline Boffo, 2007. "Information System Use--Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 173-192, June.
    13. Nardon, Luciara & Aten, Kathryn, 2008. "Beyond a better mousetrap: A cultural analysis of the adoption of ethanol in Brazil," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 261-273, July.
    14. Jui-Che Tu & Chi-Ling Hu, 2018. "A Study on the Factors Affecting Consumers’ Willingness to Accept Clothing Rentals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-30, November.
    15. Rajesh Chandwani & Rahul De’, 2017. "Doctor-patient interaction in telemedicine: Logic of choice and logic of care perspectives," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 955-968, August.
    16. Spanjers, R., 2012. "Be patient : A longitudinal study on adoption and diffusion of information technology innovation in Dutch healthcare," Other publications TiSEM 594c1680-fb6d-4396-aaf6-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Jiang Yu & Yue Zhang, 2013. "Institutional Arrangement, Technological Innovation and Application Evolution: The Rise of China’S Emerging Computing Infrastructure," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    18. van Everdingen, Y.M. & Wierenga, B., 2001. "Intra-Firm Adoption Decisions," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-21-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    19. Tarafdar, Monideepa & Vaidya, Sanjiv D., 2006. "Challenges in the adoption of E-Commerce technologies in India: The role of organizational factors," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 428-441.
    20. Atchara Leerapong, 2013. "Applying Diffusion of Innovation in Online Purchase Intention through Social Network: A Focus Group Study of Facebook in Thailand," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 5(3), pages 144-154.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:2009-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: R. Dam (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fewvunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.