IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/usi/wpaper/828.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The surplus approach, Polanyi and institutions in economic anthropology and archaeology

Author

Listed:
  • Sergio Cesaratto
  • Stefano Di Bucchianico

Abstract

This paper was inspired long ago by Jared Diamond (1997), and in particular by his extensive use of the concept of economic surplus as the key to the development of civilization. Unfortunately, Diamond does not mention the origin of the concept in classical and pre-classical economics, nor does he pay much attention to debates in economic anthropology about the role of economic analysis in studying primitive and ancient economic formations. These debates were the subject of a recent book by Cedrini & Marchionatti (2017), who dispute the neoclassical “imperialist” attempt to occupy the territory of economic anthropology. The authors rely on the institutionalist background provided by Karl Polanyi and his school and by other anthropologists of similar inspiration. Polanyians, however, fail to complete their institutional analysis by anchoring it to the changing modes of generation and distribution of the economic surplus. Yet their emphasis on the need to introduce institutions from the beginning, when speaking of economic surplus, should be taken into consideration by the classical surplus approach

Suggested Citation

  • Sergio Cesaratto & Stefano Di Bucchianico, 2020. "The surplus approach, Polanyi and institutions in economic anthropology and archaeology," Department of Economics University of Siena 828, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    • Handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.deps.unisi.it/quaderni/828.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tony Aspromourgos, 2005. "The invention of the concept of social surplus: Petty in the Hartlib Circle," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24.
    2. Richard Arena, 2013. "Sraffa’s and Wittgenstein’s Reciprocal Influences: Forms of Life and Snapshots," Post-Print halshs-00941369, HAL.
    3. Ginzburg, Andrea, 2014. "Two translators: Gramsci and Sraffa," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP1, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".
    4. Brewer, Anthony, 2011. "The Concept Of An Agricultural Surplus, From Petty To Smith," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(4), pages 487-505, December.
    5. Pierangelo Garegnani, 2024. "Value and Distribution in the Classical Economists and Marx," Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought, in: Roberto Ciccone (ed.), Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand, pages 305-340, Springer.
    6. Heath Pearson, 2010. "Ground between Two Stones: Melville Herskovits and the Fate of Economic Anthropology," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 42(5), pages 165-195, Supplemen.
    7. Mario A. Cedrini & Roberto Marchionatti, 2017. "On the Theoretical and Practical Relevance of the Concept of Gift to the Development of a Non-imperialist Economics," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 49(4), pages 633-649, December.
    8. Manuel Ramon Souza Luz & John Hall, 2019. "Original Institutional Economics and Political Anthropology: Reflections on the Nature of Coercive Power and Vested Interests in the Works of Thorstein Veblen and Pierre Clastres," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 508-514, April.
    9. Jerome Maucourant & Sebastien Plociniczak, 2013. "The Institution, the Economy and the Market: Karl Polanyi's Institutional Thought for Economists," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 512-531, July.
    10. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2017. "Karl Polanyi on economy and society: a critical analysis of core concepts," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(1), pages 1-25, January.
    11. Serge Svizzero, 2017. "Persistent Controversies about the Neolithic Revolution," Post-Print hal-02145483, HAL.
    12. Christopher Morehart, 2014. "The Potentiality and the Consequences of Surplus: Agricultural Production and Institutional Transformation in the Northern Basin of Mexico," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 154-166, January.
    13. Richard Arena, 2013. "Sraffa’s and Wittgenstein’s Reciprocal Influences: Forms of Life and Snapshots," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Enrico Sergio Levrero & Antonella Palumbo & Antonella Stirati (ed.), Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory: Volume Three, chapter 4, pages 84-105, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio Cesaratto & Stefano Di Bucchianico, 2021. "The Surplus Approach, the Polanyian Tradition, and Institutions in Economic Anthropology and Archaeology," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 55(1), pages 185-216, June.
    2. Sergio Cesaratto, 2019. "Heterodox economics and Economic Anthropology: reflections prompted by two books," Department of Economics University of Siena 807, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    3. Cesaratto, Sergio, 2023. "Surplus Approach and Institutions: Where Sraffa Meets Polanyi," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP61, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa", revised 02 May 2023.
    4. Rossi, Enrico, 2020. "Reconsidering the dual nature of property rights: personal property and capital in the law and economics of property rights," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105840, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Bellino, Enrico & Nerozzi, Sebastiano, 2013. "Causality and interdependence in Pasinetti's works and in the modern classical approach," MPRA Paper 52179, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Serrano, Franklin & Mazat, Numa, 2013. "Quesnay and the analysis of the surplus in an agrarian capitalist economy," MPRA Paper 47781, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Sergio Cesaratto, 2012. "Controversial and novel features of the Eurozone crisis as a balance of payment crisis," Department of Economics University of Siena 640, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    8. Luis Daniel Torres-González, 2020. "The Characteristics of the Productive Structure Behind the Empirical Regularities in Production Prices Curves," Working Papers 2016, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    9. José Felix Catano, 1996. "¿Un defecto en la mercancía patrón de Sraffa?," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, June.
    10. Jonathan F. Cogliano & Roberto Veneziani & Naoki Yoshihara, 2022. "Computational methods and classical‐Marxian economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 310-349, April.
    11. Jonathan F. Cogliano, 2017. "Surplus Value Production and Realization in Marxian Theory - Applications to the U.S., 1987-2015," Working Paper Series 2017-01, Dickinson College, Department of Economics.
    12. Mariolis, Theodore, 2006. "A Critical Note on Marx’s Theory of Profits," MPRA Paper 24044, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Neri Salvadori & Rodolfo Signorino, 2013. "The Classical Notion of Competition Revisited," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 149-175, Spring.
    14. Cavalieri, Duccio, 2015. "Structural interdependence in monetary economics: theoretical assessment and policy implications," MPRA Paper 65526, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Saverio M. Fratini, 2020. "Interest, profit and saving in Arrow-Debreu equilibrium models," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 14(1), pages 39-53, June.
    16. Abdulkadir Senkal, 2022. "Polanyi’nin Perspektifinden Sosyal Politikayi Okumak: Piyasa, Refah ve Emek Sorunsali," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(82), pages 1-33, June.
    17. Saverio M. Fratini, 2018. "Is Marx's absolute rent due to a monopoly price?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 961-985, September.
    18. Silvestri, Paolo, 2015. "Anthropology of Freedom and Tax Justice: Between Exchange and Gift. Thoughts for an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201534, University of Turin.
    19. Sergio Cesaratto, 2017. "Beyond the traditional monetary circuit: endogenous money, finance and the theory of long-period effective demand," Department of Economics University of Siena 757, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    20. Di Bucchianico, Stefano, 2019. "The Impact of Financialization on the Rate of Profit: A Discussion," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP36, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".

    More about this item

    Keywords

    surplus approach; economic anthropology; economic archaeology; Marx; Polanyi; Sraffa;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B51 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Socialist; Marxian; Sraffian
    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabrizio Becatti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desieit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.