IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/47781.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quesnay and the analysis of the surplus in an agrarian capitalist economy

Author

Listed:
  • Serrano, Franklin
  • Mazat, Numa

Abstract

In order to discuss the ‘rational foundation’ of certain aspects of Quesnay´s theory we use a simple formalization of the necessary connections between assumptions about the techniques in use, the distribution of income between the classes and sectors, the system of relative prices. We argue that Quesnay´s system was a truly capitalist agrarian economy and that he was indeed a pioneer of the classical political economy/surplus approach to economics as identified first by Marx, Sraffa and Garegnani, the physical surplus of grains being the necessary basis for his analysis of the distribution and relative prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Serrano, Franklin & Mazat, Numa, 2013. "Quesnay and the analysis of the surplus in an agrarian capitalist economy," MPRA Paper 47781, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:47781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/47781/1/MPRA_paper_47781.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brewer, Anthony, 2011. "The Concept Of An Agricultural Surplus, From Petty To Smith," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(4), pages 487-505, December.
    2. Jean Cartelier, 1991. "L'économie politique de François Quesnay. À propos d'un ouvrage de G. Vaggi," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 42(5), pages 923-926.
    3. Muller, A L, 1978. "Quesnay's Theory of Growth: A Comment," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 150-156, March.
    4. Gianni Vaggi, 1983. "The Physiocratic Theory Of Prices," Contributions to Political Economy, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 2(1), pages 1-22.
    5. Vaggi, Gianni, 1985. "A Physiocratic Model of Relative Prices and Income Distribution," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 95(380), pages 928-947, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Loïc Charles, 1998. "Théorie des prix et liberté d'exportation du blé chez Quesnay : une interprétation," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 32(1), pages 41-65.
    2. Deng, Kent & Shen, Jim Huangnan & Guo, Jingyuan, 2022. "Performance and mechanisms of the Maoist economy: a holistic approach, 1950-1980," Economic History Working Papers 116401, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    3. Fernando Ribeiro Leite Neto & Nelson Mendes Cantarino, 2016. "The Physiological Roots Of The Tableau Économique," Anais do XLIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 43rd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 002, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    4. Sergio Cesaratto & Stefano Di Bucchianico, 2020. "The surplus approach, Polanyi and institutions in economic anthropology and archaeology," Department of Economics University of Siena 828, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    5. Sergio Cesaratto & Stefano Di Bucchianico, 2021. "The Surplus Approach, the Polanyian Tradition, and Institutions in Economic Anthropology and Archaeology," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 55(1), pages 185-216, June.
    6. Sergio Cesaratto, 2019. "Heterodox economics and Economic Anthropology: reflections prompted by two books," Department of Economics University of Siena 807, Department of Economics, University of Siena.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Physiocracy; Capitalist Agrarian Economy; Surplus Approach; Classical Political Economy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B11 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Preclassical (Ancient, Medieval, Mercantilist, Physiocratic)
    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:47781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.