IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/usg/econwp/202502.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Biodiversity and the Design of Result-based Payments: Evidence from Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Schaub, Sergei
  • Pfaff, Alexander
  • Bonev, Petyo

Abstract

Paying farmers for measured outcomes – i.e., results, not actions - is promoted for reducing risk and raising flexibility in addressing agriculture’s environmental damages. One key design choice is how exactly to reward those measured results. Continuous rewards are possible yet, in practice, observed species outcomes have been rewarded using a single threshold (compliant/not) or, to move toward continuity, a few thresholds (e.g., low-medium-high). We assess whether more continuous rewards – specifically, multiple target thresholds for plant species - raised bird diversity. We study a pilot scheme in Germany’s Lower Saxony, where an incentive with one threshold is the baseline. Using citizen-science bird data (offering over 6.7m entries across 16 years), we find that the pilot scheme using multiple target thresholds for plant species raised bird diversity versus the single-threshold baseline (same lower threshold, but no further thresholds). Our findings show potential for benefits from even small shifts in incentive designs.

Suggested Citation

  • Schaub, Sergei & Pfaff, Alexander & Bonev, Petyo, 2025. "Biodiversity and the Design of Result-based Payments: Evidence from Germany," Economics Working Paper Series 2502, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:usg:econwp:2025:02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ux-tauri.unisg.ch/RePEc/usg/econwp/EWP-2502.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural policy; Policy design; Agri-environmental payments; Results-based payments; Biodiversity; Birds;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:usg:econwp:2025:02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vwasgch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.