IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/udf/wpaper/20220211.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La partecipazione nei progetti culturali - un’analisi del modello gestionale del progetto Prospettive – territori d’arte

Author

Listed:
  • Monia Castellini
  • Cecilia Budoni

Abstract

I progetti culturali legati all’arte contemporanea presentano un grande potenziale culturale per i territori interessati e diverse sfide a livello manageriale. In uno scenario che vede la moltiplicazione degli attori nelle politiche culturali urbane, introdurre meccanismi partecipati risulta essere uno strumento efficace per coinvolgerli direttamente. Questa visione, così diffusa da aver sancito un vero e proprio partecipatory turn, permette un arricchimento per i territori, le aziende e gli artisti interessati. In questo senso, la stakeholder analysis e gli strumenti del project management sono mezzi utili per indagare in che modo questi processi vengano attuati, gestiti e quale sia il loro impatto in termini di valore prodotto per gli attori coinvolti. Il caso studio preso in esame è quello di Prospettive – territori d’arte, progetto di residenze artistiche in Emilia-Romagna. Esso presenta caratteristiche miste, tra mecenatismo e arte pubblica. I modi di concepire la governance di un territorio, di costruire percorsi partecipati e momenti di scambio fra i diversi attori in gioco lo rendono un caso di grande interesse.

Suggested Citation

  • Monia Castellini & Cecilia Budoni, 2022. "La partecipazione nei progetti culturali - un’analisi del modello gestionale del progetto Prospettive – territori d’arte," Working Papers 20220211, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:udf:wpaper:20220211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://out.economia.unife.it/uploads/dip_deit/quaderni/20220211.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dunham, Laura & Freeman, R. Edward & Liedtka, Jeanne, 2006. "Enhancing Stakeholder Practice: A Particularized Exploration of Community," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 23-42, January.
    2. Imbernon, Ursula & Casanovas-Rubio, Maria del Mar & Monteiro, Carolina & Armengou, Jaume, 2022. "A decision-making method for planning exhibitions in arts organizations: A case study of CaixaForum Barcelona," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. R. Edward Freeman & S. Ramakrishna Velamuri, 2006. "A New Approach to CSR: Company Stakeholder Responsibility," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Andrew Kakabadse & Mette Morsing (ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility, chapter 1, pages 9-23, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Mathilde Pulh & Séverine Marteaux & Rémi Mencarelli, 2008. "Positioning strategies of cultural institutions : a renewal of the offer in the face of shifting consumer habits," Post-Print hal-00416367, HAL.
    5. Pierluigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2014. "Understanding culture-led local development: A critique of alternative theoretical explanations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(13), pages 2806-2821, October.
    6. Strauß, Anke, 2018. "Value-creation processes in artistic interventions and beyond: Engaging conflicting orders of worth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 540-545.
    7. Mathilde Pulh & Séverine Marteaux & Rémi Mencarelli, 2008. "Positioning Strategies of Cultural Institutions: A Renewal of the Offer in the Face of Shifting Consumer Trends," Post-Print halshs-00314523, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Umberto Rosin & Michele Bonazzi & Francesco Casarin, 2021. "eWOM and growth strategies for the tourism industry in maritime museum networks. The case of the Arca Adriatica tourist product," Working Papers 03, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    2. Padilla-Meléndez, Antonio & del Águila-Obra, Ana Rosa, 2013. "Web and social media usage by museums: Online value creation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 892-898.
    3. Francesco Di Maddaloni & Roya Derakhshan, 2019. "A Leap from Negative to Positive Bond. A Step towards Project Sustainability," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Cristina Aibar-Guzmán & Carmen Serrano-Valdecillos & Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán, 2022. "Analysis of the Dialogue with Stakeholders by the IBEX 35 Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Rosario Vázquez-Carrasco & M. López-Pérez, 2013. "Small & medium-sized enterprises and Corporate Social Responsibility: a systematic review of the literature," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3205-3218, October.
    6. Jill Brown & William Forster, 2013. "CSR and Stakeholder Theory: A Tale of Adam Smith," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 301-312, January.
    7. Tomina Saveanu & Daniel Badulescu & Sorana Saveanu & Maria-Madela Abrudan & Alina Badulescu, 2021. "The Role of Owner-Managers in Shaping CSR Activity of Romanian SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Saeed Janani & Ranjit M. Christopher & Atanas Nik Nikolov & Michael A. Wiles, 2022. "Marketing experience of CEOs and corporate social performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 460-481, May.
    9. AnnMarie Bennett & Breda Murphy, 2017. "The Tax Profession: Tax Avoidance and the Public Interest," Economics Department Working Paper Series n286-17.pdf, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
    10. Victoria Wells & Nick Ellis & Richard Slack & Mona Moufahim, 2019. "“It’s Us, You Know, There’s a Feeling of Community”: Exploring Notions of Community in a Consumer Co-operative," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 617-635, September.
    11. Hyuck Shin Kwon & Hyun Chae Park, 2019. "Creating Sustainable and Climate Shared Value in Public Institution: Lessons from a Case of Korea Army Cadet Military School," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Buscema, Massimo & Ferilli, Guido & Gustafsson, Christer & Massini, Giulia & Sacco, Pier Luigi, 2022. "A nonlinear, data-driven, ANNs-based approach to culture-led development policies in rural areas: The case of Gjakove and Peć districts, Western Kosovo," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    13. John Hasnas, 2013. "Whither Stakeholder Theory? A Guide for the Perplexed Revisited," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(1), pages 47-57, January.
    14. Marina V. Evseeva, 2020. "Comparative effectiveness of high-tech and medium-tech business models: Key indicators and value sustainability," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 59-71, July.
    15. Spodarczyk Edyta, 2019. "An attempt to determine the determinants of an effective impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer behaviour. A pilot study report," Management, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 64-79, December.
    16. Anita Mendiratta & Shveta Singh & Surendra Singh Yadav & Arvind Mahajan, 2023. "Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Analysis of Corporate Social Irresponsibility," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 319-339, September.
    17. Danilo Drago & Concetta Carnevale, 2020. "Do CSR Ratings Affect Loan Spreads? Evidence from European Syndicated Loan Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-30, September.
    18. Nguyen, Thi Tuyet Mai, 2017. "An examination of independent directors in Vietnam," OSF Preprints ay6dv, Center for Open Science.
    19. Maria Cerreta & Gaia Daldanise & Ludovica La Rocca & Simona Panaro, 2021. "Triggering Active Communities for Cultural Creative Cities: The “Hack the City” Play ReCH Mission in the Salerno Historic Centre (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Maria Cerreta & Eleonora Giovene di Girasole, 2020. "Towards Heritage Community Assessment: Indicators Proposal for the Self-Evaluation in Faro Convention Network Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Governance; participation; project management; stakeholder analysis; art projects/management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L32 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Public Enterprises; Public-Private Enterprises
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:udf:wpaper:20220211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alberto Benati (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deferit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.