IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucd/wpaper/202403.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The More Private Patients, the Fewer Public Patients? Evaluating the 2014 Hospitals Reform in Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • Xidong Guo

    (Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China)

  • Eóin T. Flaherty

    (School of Economics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland)

  • Huihui Li

    (Department of Economics and Finance, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Jiming Zhu

    (Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China)

Abstract

Background This study evaluates the 2014 hospital reform in Ireland, which allowed public hospitals to accommodate private patients in public wards. There were widespread concerns that this reform might incentivise public consultants to prioritise private patients over public ones. However, what was overlooked by the general public is that consultants are bound by contract terms: for every treated private patient, they must treat an additional three to four public patients. Methods We utilise nationwide administrative hospital inpatient discharge record data from 2009 to 2015, with 2,323,600 observations. We employ a difference-in-differences method to empirically evaluate the impacts of the 2014 reform on hospital admissions, the ratio of private patients, patients’ length of stay, and mortality rate. Findings Contrary to the concerns expressed by the general public and media, we do not find evidence that more proportion of private patients were treated. Actually, we demonstrate that the reform positively impacted public patients by increasing their admission rates and improving treatment efficiency. Additionally, these benefits did not come at the expense of their quality of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Xidong Guo & Eóin T. Flaherty & Huihui Li & Jiming Zhu, 2024. "The More Private Patients, the Fewer Public Patients? Evaluating the 2014 Hospitals Reform in Ireland," Working Papers 202403, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucd:wpaper:202403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ucd.ie/geary/static/publications/workingpapers/gearywp202403.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murphy, Aileen & Bourke, Jane & Turner, Brian, 2020. "A two-tiered public-private health system: Who stays in (private) hospitals in Ireland?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(7), pages 765-771.
    2. Tountas, Yannis & Karnaki, Panagiota & Pavi, Elpida, 2002. "Reforming the reform: the greek national health system in transition," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 15-29, October.
    3. Lim, Meng-Kin, 2004. "Shifting the burden of health care finance: a case study of public-private partnership in Singapore," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 83-92, July.
    4. Brendan Walsh & Samantha Smith & Maev-Ann Wren & James Eighan & Seán Lyons, 2022. "The impact of inpatient bed capacity on length of stay," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(3), pages 499-510, April.
    5. Paula González, 2004. "Should physicians' dual practice be limited? An incentive approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(6), pages 505-524, June.
    6. Pérotin, Virginie & Zamora, Bernarda & Reeves, Rachel & Bartlett, Will & Allen, Pauline, 2013. "Does hospital ownership affect patient experience? An investigation into public–private sector differences in England," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 633-646.
    7. Turner, Brian, 2015. "Unwinding the State subsidisation of private health insurance in Ireland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(10), pages 1349-1357.
    8. Shmueli, Amir & Savage, Elizabeth, 2014. "Private and public patients in public hospitals in Australia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 189-195.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Whyte, Richard & Connolly, Sheelah & Wren, Maev-Ann, 2020. "Insurance status and waiting times for hospital-based services in Ireland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(11), pages 1174-1181.
    2. Connolly, Sheelah & Wren, Maev-Ann, 2023. "Towards universal healthcare in Ireland – what can we learn from the literature?," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number SUSTAT121.
    3. Connolly, Sheelah & Brick, Aoife & O'Neill, Ciarán & O'Callaghan, Michael, 2022. "An analysis of the primary care systems of Ireland and Northern Ireland," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS137.
    4. DeVolder, Russell & Serra-Sastre, Victoria & Zamora, Bernarda, 2020. "Examining the variation across acute trusts in patient delayed discharge," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(11), pages 1226-1232.
    5. Moscone, Francesco & Siciliani, Luigi & Tosetti, Elisa & Vittadini, Giorgio, 2020. "Do public and private hospitals differ in quality? Evidence from Italy," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    6. Liu, Ting & Sun, Jiayin, 2007. "Informal payments in developing countries' public health sector," MPRA Paper 5279, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Tor Iversen & Ching-to Ma, 2011. "Market conditions and general practitioners’ referrals," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 245-265, December.
    8. Martin Chalkley, 2018. "Private Provision of Publicly Funded Health Care: The Economics of Ownership," Briefing 002055, Office of Health Economics.
    9. Siverskog, Jonathan & Henriksson, Martin, 2022. "The health cost of reducing hospital bed capacity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    10. Walter Beckert & Elaine Kelly, 2021. "Divided by choice? For‐profit providers, patient choice and mechanisms of patient sorting in the English National Health Service," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 820-839, April.
    11. Mikkers, Misja, 2016. "The Dutch Healthcare System in International Perspective," Other publications TiSEM 800704a0-24ee-4830-8659-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Aletras, Vassilios & Kontodimopoulos, Nick & Zagouldoudis, Athanasios & Niakas, Dimitris, 2007. "The short-term effect on technical and scale efficiency of establishing regional health systems and general management in Greek NHS hospitals," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(2-3), pages 236-245, October.
    13. Milcent, Carine, 2023. "The sorting effect in healthcare access: Those left behind," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    14. Kanika Kapur, 2020. "Private Health Insurance in Ireland: Trends and Determinants," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 51(1), pages 63-92.
    15. Katherine Cuff & Jeremiah Hurley & Stuart Mestelman & Andrew Muller & Robert Nuscheler, 2012. "Public and private health‐care financing with alternate public rationing rules," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(2), pages 83-100, February.
    16. Siciliani, Luigi, 2006. "Selection of treatment under prospective payment systems in the hospital sector," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 479-499, May.
    17. Emmanouilidou, Maria & Burke, Maria, 2013. "A thematic review and a policy-analysis agenda of Electronic Health Records in the Greek National Health System," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 31-37.
    18. Wen, Tianzuo & Qiang, Wei & Liu, Xingjian, 2022. "Exploring the geography of urban comprehensive development in mainland Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    19. Michael Kuhn & Robert Nuscheler, 2020. "Saving the public from the private? Incentives and outcomes in dual practice," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 22(4), pages 1120-1150, August.
    20. repec:ces:ifodic:v:2:y:2004:i:3:p:14567778 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Conor Keegan & Aoife Brick & Brendan Walsh & Adele Bergin & James Eighan & Maev‐Ann Wren, 2019. "How many beds? Capacity implications of hospital care demand projections in the Irish hospital system, 2015‐2030," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 569-582, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Private patients; Public patients; Private practice within public hospitals; Little’s Law; Length of stay;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • H44 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets
    • J45 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Public Sector Labor Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucd:wpaper:202403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Geary Tech (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/geucdie.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.