IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tiu/tiucen/5ee32003-ef02-4bc6-a883-ba4a0dc6d7fc.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Simple estimators for dynamic panel data models with errors in variables

Author

Listed:
  • Wansbeek, T.J.
  • Kapteyn, A.J.

    (Tilburg University, Center For Economic Research)

Abstract

The model considered in this chapter is a rather simple dynamic error components model. Models of this type have been studied by a number of authors, including Nerlove (1967, 1971), Trognon (1978), Anderson and Hsiao (1981), and Sevestre and Trognon (1985). Our assumptions will be fairly conventional, except for the fact that lagged endogenous or exogenous variables are allowed to suffer from measurement error. A variant of this model, not including error components, has been studied extensively in the literature, cf. Aigner et al. (1984). A full treatment of ML estimation in this so-called dynamic shock-error model has been given by Ghosh (1989). Grtliches and Hausman (1986) study another variant, namely a static panel data model with measurement error in the exogenous variables.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Wansbeek, T.J. & Kapteyn, A.J., 1989. "Simple estimators for dynamic panel data models with errors in variables," Discussion Paper 1989-51, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:tiu:tiucen:5ee32003-ef02-4bc6-a883-ba4a0dc6d7fc
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/1154247/TWAK5620604.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Griliches, Zvi & Hausman, Jerry A., 1986. "Errors in variables in panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 93-118, February.
    2. Merckens, Arjen & Wansbeek, Tom, 1989. "Formula manipulation in statistics on the computer: Evaluating the expectation of higher-degree functions of normally distributed matrices," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 189-200, July.
    3. Kapteyn, Arie & de Zeeuw, Aart, 1991. "Changing incentives for economic research in the Netherlands," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2-3), pages 603-611, April.
    4. Sevestre, P. & Trognon, A., 1985. "A note on autoregressive error components models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 231-245, May.
    5. Theil, Henri, 1983. "Linear algebra and matrix methods in econometrics," Handbook of Econometrics, in: Z. Griliches† & M. D. Intriligator (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 1, pages 3-65, Elsevier.
    6. Nerlove, Marc, 1971. "Further Evidence on the Estimation of Dynamic Economic Relations from a Time Series of Cross Sections," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 39(2), pages 359-382, March.
    7. Ghosh, Damayanti, 1989. "Maximum likelihood estimation of the dynamic shock-error model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 121-143, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erik Meijer & Laura Spierdijk & Tom Wansbeek, 2012. "Point and Set Identification in Linear Panel Data Models with Measurement Error," Working Papers WR-941, RAND Corporation.
    2. Stefan Dercon & Pramila Krishnan, 2000. "In Sickness and in Health: Risk Sharing within Households in Rural Ethiopia," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(4), pages 688-727, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsai, Tsung-Han, 2016. "A Bayesian Approach to Dynamic Panel Models with Endogenous Rarely Changing Variables," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 595-620, September.
    2. Meijer, Erik & Spierdijk, Laura & Wansbeek, Tom, 2017. "Consistent estimation of linear panel data models with measurement error," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 169-180.
    3. Alain Pirotte & Jesús Mur, 2017. "Neglected dynamics and spatial dependence on panel data: consequences for convergence of the usual static model estimators," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2-3), pages 202-229, July.
    4. Kiviet, Jan F., 1995. "On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 53-78, July.
    5. Nerlove, Marc, 1995. "Formulation and Estimation of Econometric Models for Panel Data," Working Papers 197824, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Hayakawa, Kazuhiko, 2024. "Recent development of covariance structure analysis in economics," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 31-48.
    7. Mario Jametti & Thomas von Ungern-Sternberg, 2005. "Assessing the Efficiency of an Insurance Provider—A Measurement Error Approach," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 30(1), pages 15-34, June.
    8. Daron Acemoglu & Amy Finkelstein, 2008. "Input and Technology Choices in Regulated Industries: Evidence from the Health Care Sector," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 116(5), pages 837-880, October.
    9. Imam, M. & Jamasb, T. & Llorca, M. & Llorca, M., 2018. "Power Sector Reform and Corruption: Evidence from Electricity Industry in Sub-Saharan Africa," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1801, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    10. Castelló-Climent, Amparo & Mukhopadhyay, Abhiroop, 2013. "Mass education or a minority well educated elite in the process of growth: The case of India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 303-320.
    11. Zhou, Xianming, 2001. "Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance: comment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 559-571, December.
    12. Arellano, Manuel & Blundell, Richard & Bonhomme, Stéphane & Light, Jack, 2024. "Heterogeneity of consumption responses to income shocks in the presence of nonlinear persistence," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(2).
    13. Frederick Ploeg & Aart Zeeuw, 1992. "International aspects of pollution control," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 2(2), pages 117-139, March.
    14. Thomas J. Kniesner & James P. Ziliak, 2002. "Tax Reform and Automatic Stabilization," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(3), pages 590-612, June.
    15. Wang, Huixia & Wang, Chenggang & Halliday, Timothy J., 2018. "Health and health inequality during the great recession: Evidence from the PSID," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 17-30.
    16. SungJun Kim, 2017. "What drives shadow banking? A dynamic panel evidence," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Statistical implications of the new financial landscape, volume 43, Bank for International Settlements.
    17. Zhiguo Xiao & Jun Shao & Mari Palta, 2010. "GMM in linear regression for longitudinal data with multiple covariates measured with error," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 791-805.
    18. Abonazel, Mohamed R., 2016. "Bias Correction Methods for Dynamic Panel Data Models with Fixed Effects," MPRA Paper 70628, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Bernt Bratsberg & Oddbjørn Raaum & Marianne Røed & Pål Schøne, 2010. "Immigration Wage Impacts by Origin," RF Berlin - CReAM Discussion Paper Series 1030, Rockwool Foundation Berlin (RF Berlin) - Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM).
    20. van Wijnbergen, Sweder, 1992. "Trade Reform, Policy Uncertainty, and the Current Account: A Non-Expected-Utility Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(3), pages 626-633, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Estimation; Panel Data;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tiu:tiucen:5ee32003-ef02-4bc6-a883-ba4a0dc6d7fc. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard Broekman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://center.uvt.nl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.