IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tiu/tiucen/42bfa59c-dba6-427e-ac48-9914d9b4780c.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Link Monotonic Allocation Schemes

Author

Listed:
  • Slikker, M.

    (Tilburg University, Center For Economic Research)

Abstract

A network is a graph where the nodes represent players and the links represent bilateral interaction between the players. A reward game assigns a value to every network on a fixed set of players. An allocation scheme specifies how to distribute the worth of every network among the players. This allocation scheme is link monotonic if extending the network does not decrease the payoff of any player. We characterize the class of reward games that have a link monotonic allocation scheme. Two allocation schemes for reward games are studied, the Myerson allocation scheme and the position allocation scheme, which are both based on allocation rules for communication situations. We introduce two notions of convexity in the setting of reward games and with these notions of convexity we characterize the classes of reward games where the Myerson allocation scheme and the position allocation scheme are link monotonic. As a by-product we find a characterization of the Myerson value and the position value on the class of reward games using potentials.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Slikker, M., 1999. "Link Monotonic Allocation Schemes," Discussion Paper 1999-06, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:tiu:tiucen:42bfa59c-dba6-427e-ac48-9914d9b4780c
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/531019/6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jackson, Matthew O. & Wolinsky, Asher, 1996. "A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 44-74, October.
    2. Roger B. Myerson, 1977. "Graphs and Cooperation in Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 225-229, August.
    3. Sprumont, Yves, 1990. "Population monotonic allocation schemes for cooperative games with transferable utility," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 378-394, December.
    4. Borm, P.E.M. & Owen, G. & Tijs, S.H., 1992. "On the position value for communication situations," Other publications TiSEM 5a8473e4-1df7-42df-ad53-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Jesus Marin Solano & Carlos Rafels Pallarola, 1996. "Convexity versus average convexity: potential, pmas, the shapley value and simple games," Working Papers in Economics 3, Universitat de Barcelona. Espai de Recerca en Economia.
    6. Dutta, Bhaskar & Mutuswami, Suresh, 1997. "Stable Networks," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 322-344, October.
      • Dutta, Bhaskar & Mutuswami, Suresh, 1996. "Stable Networks," Working Papers 971, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niharika Kakoty & Surajit Borkotokey & Rajnish Kumar & Abhijit Bora, 2024. "Weighted Myerson value for Network games," Papers 2402.11464, arXiv.org.
    2. A. Ghintran & E. González-Arangüena & C. Manuel, 2012. "A probabilistic position value," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 183-196, December.
    3. Slikker, Marco, 2007. "Bidding for surplus in network allocation problems," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 493-511, November.
    4. van den Nouweland, Anne & Slikker, Marco, 2012. "An axiomatic characterization of the position value for network situations," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 266-271.
    5. Belau, Julia, 2016. "Outside option values for network games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 76-86.
    6. Jilei Shi & Erfang Shan, 2021. "The Banzhaf value for generalized probabilistic communication situations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 301(1), pages 225-244, June.
    7. Surajit Borkotokey & Sujata Goala & Niharika Kakoty & Parishmita Boruah, 2022. "The component-wise egalitarian Myerson value for Network Games," Papers 2201.02793, arXiv.org.
    8. Niharika Kakoty & Surajit Borkotokey & Rajnish Kumar & Abhijit Bora, 2023. "Weighted position value for Network games," Papers 2308.03494, arXiv.org.
    9. Surajit Borkotokey & Loyimee Gogoi & Sudipta Sarangi, 2014. "A Survey of Player-based and Link-based Allocation Rules for Network Games," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 2(1), pages 5-26, June.
    10. Napel, Stefan & Nohn, Andreas & Alonso-Meijide, José Maria, 2012. "Monotonicity of power in weighted voting games with restricted communication," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 247-257.
    11. Allouch, N. & Guardiola, Luis A. & Meca, A., 2024. "Measuring productivity in networks: A game-theoretic approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Slikker, M., 1999. "Link Monotonic Allocation Schemes," Other publications TiSEM 42bfa59c-dba6-427e-ac48-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Jean-François Caulier & Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2015. "An allocation rule for dynamic random network formation processes," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 60(2), pages 283-313, October.
    3. Slikker, M., 1998. "Average Convexity in Communication Situations," Discussion Paper 1998-12, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    4. Jackson, Matthew O., 2005. "Allocation rules for network games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 128-154, April.
    5. Slikker, M. & Gilles, R.P. & Norde, H.W. & Tijs, S.H., 2000. "Directed Communication Networks," Discussion Paper 2000-84, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    6. Slikker, M., 1998. "Average Convexity in Communication Situations," Other publications TiSEM 612b0000-a66a-435a-a707-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Jean-François Caulier & Ana Mauleon & Vincent Vannetelbosch, 2013. "Contractually stable networks," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(2), pages 483-499, May.
    8. Roland Pongou & Roberto Serrano, 2009. "A dynamic theory of fidelity networks with an application to the spread of HIV/AIDS," Working Papers 2009-03, Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA) Ciencias Sociales.
    9. Kamijo, Yoshio, 2009. "A linear proportional effort allocation rule," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 341-353, November.
    10. C. Manuel & D. Martín, 2021. "A value for communication situations with players having different bargaining abilities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 301(1), pages 161-182, June.
    11. Page Jr., Frank H. & Wooders, Myrna, 2009. "Strategic basins of attraction, the path dominance core, and network formation games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 462-487, May.
    12. Slikker, M. & Gilles, R.P. & Norde, H.W. & Tijs, S.H., 2000. "Directed Communication Networks," Other publications TiSEM 00f2df6e-3a8e-4ed3-84cf-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & van der Laan, Gerard & Talman, Dolf, 2007. "The socially stable core in structured transferable utility games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 85-104, April.
    14. Calvo-Armengol, Antoni, 2001. "Bargaining power in communication networks," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 69-87, January.
    15. Dutta, Bhaskar & Ghosal, Sayantan & Ray, Debraj, 2005. "Farsighted network formation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 143-164, June.
    16. Surajit Borkotokey & Sujata Goala & Niharika Kakoty & Parishmita Boruah, 2022. "The component-wise egalitarian Myerson value for Network Games," Papers 2201.02793, arXiv.org.
    17. PAPACCIO, Anna, 2013. "Bilateralism and Multilateralism: a Network Approach," CELPE Discussion Papers 125, CELPE - CEnter for Labor and Political Economics, University of Salerno, Italy.
    18. Julia Belau, 2018. "The class of ASN-position values," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 50(1), pages 65-99, January.
    19. Sergio Currarini & Carmen Marchiori & Alessandro Tavoni, 2016. "Network Economics and the Environment: Insights and Perspectives," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(1), pages 159-189, September.
    20. Slikker, M. & van den Nouweland, C.G.A.M., 1999. "Network Formation Models With Costs for Establishing Links," Research Memorandum 771, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    network; reward game; monotonic allocation scheme;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology
    • C0 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General
    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling
    • C7 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory
    • D5 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium
    • D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
    • M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tiu:tiucen:42bfa59c-dba6-427e-ac48-9914d9b4780c. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard Broekman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://center.uvt.nl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.