IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20240069.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Joint extreme Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall dynamics with a single integrated tail shape parameter

Author

Listed:
  • Enzo D'Innocenzo

    (University of Bologna)

  • Andre Lucas

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Tinbergen Institute)

  • Bernd Schwaab

    (European Central Bank)

  • Xin Zhang

    (Sveriges Riksbank)

Abstract

We propose a robust semi-parametric framework for persistent time-varying extreme tail behavior, including extreme Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES). The framework builds on Extreme Value Theory and uses a conditional version of the Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) for peaks-over-threshold (POT) dynamics. Unlike earlier approaches, our model (i) has unit root-like, i.e., integrated autoregressive dynamics for the GPD tail shape, and (ii) re-scales POTs by their thresholds to obtain a more parsimonious model with only one time-varying parameter to describe the entire tail. We establish parameter regions for stationarity, ergodicity, and invertibility for the integrated time-varying parameter model and its filter, and formulate conditions for consistency and asymptotic normality of the maximum likelihood estimator. Using four exchange rate series, we illustrate how the new model captures the dynamics of extreme VaR and ES.

Suggested Citation

  • Enzo D'Innocenzo & Andre Lucas & Bernd Schwaab & Xin Zhang, 2024. "Joint extreme Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall dynamics with a single integrated tail shape parameter," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-069/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20240069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/24069.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harvey,Andrew C., 2013. "Dynamic Models for Volatility and Heavy Tails," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107630024.
    2. Jensen, Søren Tolver & Rahbek, Anders, 2004. "Asymptotic Inference For Nonstationary Garch," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(6), pages 1203-1226, December.
    3. Enzo D’Innocenzo & André Lucas & Bernd Schwaab & Xin Zhang, 2024. "Modeling Extreme Events: Time-Varying Extreme Tail Shape," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 903-917, July.
    4. Patton, Andrew J. & Ziegel, Johanna F. & Chen, Rui, 2019. "Dynamic semiparametric models for expected shortfall (and Value-at-Risk)," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 211(2), pages 388-413.
    5. Yannick Hoga, 2017. "Testing for changes in (extreme) VaR," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 20(1), pages 23-51, February.
    6. Laurens de Haan & Chen Zhou, 2021. "Trends in Extreme Value Indices," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(535), pages 1265-1279, July.
    7. Robert F. Engle & Simone Manganelli, 2004. "CAViaR: Conditional Autoregressive Value at Risk by Regression Quantiles," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 22, pages 367-381, October.
    8. Catania, Leopoldo & Luati, Alessandra, 2023. "Semiparametric modeling of multiple quantiles," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    9. Li, Dong & Zhang, Xingfa & Zhu, Ke & Ling, Shiqing, 2018. "The ZD-GARCH model: A new way to study heteroscedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 1-17.
    10. Drew Creal & Siem Jan Koopman & André Lucas, 2013. "Generalized Autoregressive Score Models With Applications," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 777-795, August.
    11. F. Blasques & S. J. Koopman & A. Lucas, 2015. "Information-theoretic optimality of observation-driven time series models for continuous responses," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(2), pages 325-343.
    12. Uhlig, Harald, 2022. "A Luna-tic Stablecoin Crash," CEPR Discussion Papers 17465, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Lee, Sang-Won & Hansen, Bruce E., 1994. "Asymptotic Theory for the Garch(1,1) Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimator," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 29-52, March.
    14. McNeil, Alexander J. & Frey, Rudiger, 2000. "Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: an extreme value approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(3-4), pages 271-300, November.
    15. Blasques, Francisco & Koopman, Siem Jan & Łasak, Katarzyna & Lucas, André, 2016. "In-sample confidence bands and out-of-sample forecast bands for time-varying parameters in observation-driven models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 875-887.
    16. Marco Rocco, 2014. "Extreme Value Theory In Finance: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 82-108, February.
    17. Christian Francq & Jean‐Michel Zakoïan, 2012. "Strict Stationarity Testing and Estimation of Explosive and Stationary Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 821-861, March.
    18. Daniele Massacci, 2017. "Tail Risk Dynamics in Stock Returns: Links to the Macroeconomy and Global Markets Connectedness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 3072-3089, September.
    19. John H. J. Einmahl & Laurens Haan & Chen Zhou, 2016. "Statistics of heteroscedastic extremes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(1), pages 31-51, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerlach, Richard & Wang, Chao, 2020. "Semi-parametric dynamic asymmetric Laplace models for tail risk forecasting, incorporating realized measures," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 489-506.
    2. Francisco Blasques & Paolo Gorgi & Siem Jan Koopman & Olivier Wintenberger, 2016. "Feasible Invertibility Conditions and Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Observation-Driven Models," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-082/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    3. Chao Wang & Richard Gerlach, 2019. "Semi-parametric Realized Nonlinear Conditional Autoregressive Expectile and Expected Shortfall," Papers 1906.09961, arXiv.org.
    4. Eric A. Beutner & Yicong Lin & Andre Lucas, 2023. "Consistency, distributional convergence, and optimality of score-driven filters," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 23-051/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    5. F Blasques & P Gorgi & S Koopman & O Wintenberger, 2016. "Feasible Invertibility Conditions for Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Observation-Driven Models," Papers 1610.02863, arXiv.org.
    6. Catania, Leopoldo & Grassi, Stefano, 2022. "Forecasting cryptocurrency volatility," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 878-894.
    7. David Happersberger & Harald Lohre & Ingmar Nolte, 2020. "Estimating portfolio risk for tail risk protection strategies," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 26(4), pages 1107-1146, September.
    8. Fuentes, Fernanda & Herrera, Rodrigo & Clements, Adam, 2023. "Forecasting extreme financial risk: A score-driven approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 720-735.
    9. Marco Bee & Luca Trapin, 2018. "Estimating and Forecasting Conditional Risk Measures with Extreme Value Theory: A Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-16, April.
    10. F Blasques & P Gorgi & S J Koopman & O Wintenberger, 2016. "Feasible Invertibility Conditions for Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Observation-Driven Models ," Working Papers hal-01377971, HAL.
    11. Giuseppe Storti & Chao Wang, 2021. "Modelling uncertainty in financial tail risk: a forecast combination and weighted quantile approach," Papers 2104.04918, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    12. Taylor, James W., 2022. "Forecasting Value at Risk and expected shortfall using a model with a dynamic omega ratio," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    13. Candia, Claudio & Herrera, Rodrigo, 2024. "An empirical review of dynamic extreme value models for forecasting value at risk, expected shortfall and expectile," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. Stephen Thiele, 2020. "Modeling the conditional distribution of financial returns with asymmetric tails," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 46-60, January.
    15. Lazar, Emese & Pan, Jingqi & Wang, Shixuan, 2024. "On the estimation of Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall at extreme levels," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    16. Timo Dimitriadis & Xiaochun Liu & Julie Schnaitmann, 2020. "Encompassing Tests for Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall Multi-Step Forecasts based on Inference on the Boundary," Papers 2009.07341, arXiv.org.
    17. Lucas, André & Zhang, Xin, 2016. "Score-driven exponentially weighted moving averages and Value-at-Risk forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 293-302.
    18. Song, Shijia & Li, Handong, 2022. "Predicting VaR for China's stock market: A score-driven model based on normal inverse Gaussian distribution," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Rutger-Jan Lange & Bram van Os & Dick van Dijk, 2022. "Implicit score-driven filters for time-varying parameter models," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-066/III, Tinbergen Institute, revised 21 Nov 2024.
    20. Ardia, David & Bluteau, Keven & Boudt, Kris & Catania, Leopoldo, 2018. "Forecasting risk with Markov-switching GARCH models:A large-scale performance study," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 733-747.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    dynamic tail risk; integrated score-driven models; extreme value theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20240069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.