IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20220002.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Business models for Mobility as an Service

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent A.C. van den Berg

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Henk Meurs

    (Radboud University)

  • Erik T. Verhoef

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Abstract

Travellers often combine transport services from different firms to form trip chains: e.g. first taking a train and then a bus. Integration of different forms of public and private transport into a single service is gaining attention with the concept of Mobility as a Service (MaaS). Usually the attention focuses on such things as ease of use for travellers and shifting demand away from the car. We focus on the effects of MaaS on behaviour and welfare via the market structure of transportation. In particular, we analyse three archetypical ways in which MaaS could be operationalised: Integrator, Platform, and Intermediary.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent A.C. van den Berg & Henk Meurs & Erik T. Verhoef, 2022. "Business models for Mobility as an Service," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-002/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20220002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/22002.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Economides, Nicholas & Salop, Steven C, 1992. "Competition and Integration among Complements, and Network Market Structure," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 105-123, March.
    2. Zhang, Rong & Liu, Bin & Wang, Wenliang, 2012. "Pricing decisions in a dual channels system with different power structures," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 523-533.
    3. Mantin, Benny, 2012. "Airport complementarity: Private vs. government ownership and welfare gravitation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 381-388.
    4. Ke, Jintao & Yang, Hai & Li, Xinwei & Wang, Hai & Ye, Jieping, 2020. "Pricing and equilibrium in on-demand ride-pooling markets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 411-431.
    5. S. Chan Choi, 1991. "Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 271-296.
    6. Clark, Derek John & Jørgensen, Finn & Mathisen, Terje Andreas, 2014. "Competition in complementary transport services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 146-159.
    7. Di, Xuan & Ban, Xuegang Jeff, 2019. "A unified equilibrium framework of new shared mobility systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 50-78.
    8. Pantelidis, Theodoros P. & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Rasulkhani, Saeid, 2020. "A many-to-many assignment game and stable outcome algorithm to evaluate collaborative mobility-as-a-service platforms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 79-100.
    9. Nirvikar Singh & Xavier Vives, 1984. "Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 15(4), pages 546-554, Winter.
    10. Erik T. Verhoef, 2008. "Private Roads: Auctions and Competition in Networks," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 42(3), pages 463-493, September.
    11. Czerny, Achim I. & van den Berg, Vincent A.C. & Verhoef, Erik T., 2016. "Carrier collaboration with endogenous fleets and load factors when networks are complementary," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 285-297.
    12. Theodoros P. Pantelidis & Joseph Y. J. Chow & Saeid Rasulkhani, 2019. "A many-to-many assignment game and stable outcome algorithm to evaluate collaborative Mobility-as-a-Service platforms," Papers 1911.04435, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    13. Brueckner, Jan K., 2001. "The economics of international codesharing: an analysis of airline alliances," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 19(10), pages 1475-1498, December.
    14. van den Berg, Vincent A.C., 2013. "Serial private infrastructures," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 186-202.
    15. Vincent A.C. van den Berg & Erik T. Verhoef, 2015. "Robot Cars and Dynamic Bottleneck Congestion: The Effects on Capacity, Value of Time and Preference Heterogeneity," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-062/VIII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 11 Jul 2016.
    16. Verhoef, Erik T. & Emmerink, Richard H. M. & Nijkamp, Peter & Rietveld, Piet, 1996. "Information provision, flat and fine congestion tolling and the efficiency of road usage," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 505-529, August.
    17. Hugo E. Silva & Erik T. Verhoef, 2011. "Optimal Pricing of Flights and Passengers at Congested Airports: The Efficiency of Atomistic Charges," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-179/3, Tinbergen Institute, revised 28 Mar 2013.
    18. Rasulkhani, Saeid & Chow, Joseph Y.J., 2019. "Route-cost-assignment with joint user and operator behavior as a many-to-one stable matching assignment game," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 60-81.
    19. Peraphan Jittrapirom & Valeria Caiati & Anna-Maria Feneri & Shima Ebrahimigharehbaghi & María J. Alonso González & Jishnu Narayan, 2017. "Mobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(2), pages 13-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van den Berg, Vincent A.C. & Meurs, Henk & Verhoef, Erik T., 2022. "Business models for Mobility as an Service (MaaS)," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 203-229.
    2. Vincent A.C. van den Berg & Henk Meurs & Erik T. Verhoef, 2020. "Business models for interoperable mobility services," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 20-051/VIII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 05 Apr 2021.
    3. McHardy, Jolian, 2024. "Platform business models and strategic price interaction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    4. Huang, Wentao & Jian, Sisi & Rey, David, 2024. "Non-additive network pricing with non-cooperative mobility service providers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(3), pages 802-824.
    5. Yao, Rui & Zhang, Kenan, 2024. "Design an intermediary mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) platform using many-to-many stable matching framework," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    6. Ding, Xiaoshu & Qi, Qi & Jian, Sisi & Yang, Hai, 2023. "Mechanism design for Mobility-as-a-Service platform considering travelers’ strategic behavior and multidimensional requirements," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1-30.
    7. McHardy, Jolian & Reynolds, Michael & Trotter, Stephen, 2023. "A consumer surplus, welfare and profit enhancing strategy for improving urban public transport networks," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    8. Liu, Qi & Chow, Joseph Y.J., 2022. "Efficient and stable data-sharing in a public transit oligopoly as a coopetitive game," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 64-87.
    9. van den Berg, Vincent A.C., 2013. "Serial private infrastructures," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 186-202.
    10. Wang, Yineng & Lin, Xi & He, Fang & Li, Meng, 2022. "Designing transit-oriented multi-modal transportation systems considering travelers’ choices," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 292-327.
    11. Huang, Naqun & Lien, Jaimie W. & Zheng, Jie, 2023. "To acquire or compete? Government intervention in transportation under different route structures," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    12. Zhou, Yaqian & Yang, Hai & Ke, Jintao & Wang, Hai & Li, Xinwei, 2022. "Competition and third-party platform-integration in ride-sourcing markets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 76-103.
    13. Luo, Chenghong & Pérez-Castrillo, David & Sun, Chaoran, 2024. "The equilibrium-value convergence for the multiple-partners game," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    14. Rafael Moner Colonques & Ricardo Flores Fillol, 2006. "Strategic Effects Of Airline Alliances," Working Papers. Serie AD 2006-06, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    15. Chen, Xu & Wang, Xiaojun, 2015. "Free or bundled: Channel selection decisions under different power structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 11-20.
    16. Li, Ruijie & Liu, Yang & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2024. "Allocation problem in cross-platform ride-hail integration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    17. van den Berg, Vincent A.C. & Rouwendal, Jan, 2016. "Tender auctions with existing operators bidding," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 1-10.
    18. Ma, Lidan & Zhang, Rong & Guo, Sandang & Liu, Bin, 2012. "Pricing decisions and strategies selection of dominant manufacturer in dual-channel supply chain," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 2558-2565.
    19. Daou, Sylvain & Leurent, Fabien, 2024. "Modelling mobility as a service: A literature review," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    20. Liu, Bingqing & Chow, Joseph Y． J．, 2024. "On-demand mobility-as-a-Service platform assignment games with guaranteed stable outcomes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    MaaS; market structure; platform; intermediary; integrator; regulation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R4 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics
    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20220002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.