IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20200022.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dutch municipal elections 1998-2018: more localism and fragmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Raymond Gradus

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Elbert Dijkgraaf

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Tjerk Budding

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Abstract

Exploring the outcome of Dutch municipal elections between 1998 and 2018, this paper finds two dominant trends: increasing political fragmentation and localism. When explaining localism, the number of inhabitants, regional diversity and the election year dummies are significant. The last result gives some indication for a welfare hypothesis as a large decentralisation of Dutch social policy took place in 2007 and 2015. Some evidence is found for a merger effect of more or less equal municipalities. There is evidence as well that more fragmentation in the municipal council leads to more aldermen. The number of aldermen is also depending on the number of inhabitants and a merger effect in case of two municipalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Raymond Gradus & Elbert Dijkgraaf & Tjerk Budding, 2020. "Dutch municipal elections 1998-2018: more localism and fragmentation," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 20-022/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20200022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/20022.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Otjes, 2018. "Pushed by national politics or pulled by localism? Voting for independent local parties in the Netherlands," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 305-328, May.
    2. Elinder, Mikael & Jordahl, Henrik, 2013. "Political preferences and public sector outsourcing," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 43-57.
    3. Elbert Dijkgraaf & Raymond Gradus, 2007. "Explaining Sunday Shop Policies," De Economist, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 207-219, June.
    4. Maarten A. Allers & J. Bieuwe Geertsema, 2016. "The Effects Of Local Government Amalgamation On Public Spending, Taxation, And Service Levels: Evidence From 15 Years Of Municipal Consolidation," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 659-682, September.
    5. Simon Otjes, 2020. "Going Local. Voting for independent local Parties in the Netherlands 1986-2010," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 91-115, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raymond (R.H.J.M.) Gradus & Elbert (E.) Dijkgraaf, 2017. "Dutch Municipalities are Becoming Greener: Some Political and Institutional Explanations," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-086/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    2. Hirota, Haruaki & Iwata, Kazuyuki & Tanaka, Kenta, 2022. "Is public official training effective at reducing costs? Evidence from survey data on Japanese municipal mergers," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 145-158.
    3. Bertacchini, Enrico & Dalle Nogare, Chiara, 2014. "Public provision vs. outsourcing of cultural services: Evidence from Italian cities," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 168-182.
    4. World Bank, 2022. "Municipal Mergers and Associations," World Bank Publications - Reports 38330, The World Bank Group.
    5. Wei Tang & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, 2017. "Do city–county mergers in China promote local economic development?," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 25(3), pages 439-469, July.
    6. Tavares Antonio F., 2018. "Municipal amalgamations and their effects: a literature review," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 5-15, March.
    7. Christian Bjørnskov & Niklas Potrafke, 2013. "The size and scope of government in the US states: does party ideology matter?," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(4), pages 687-714, August.
    8. Roesel, Felix, 2017. "Do mergers of large local governments reduce expenditures? – Evidence from Germany using the synthetic control method," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 22-36.
    9. Marian Kachniarz & Zbigniew Piepiora, 2019. "The Effectiveness of Administrative Consolidation Processes in Urban Functional Areas. Case Studies from Poland and the USA," Proceedings of the 14th International RAIS Conference, August 19-20, 2019 007MK, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    10. John William Hatfield & Katrina Kosec & Luke P. Rodgers, 2024. "Housing values and jurisdictional fragmentation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 83-122, October.
    11. Niklas Potrafke, 2019. "Does Public Sector Outsourcing Decrease Public Employment? Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 65(4), pages 464-484.
    12. Paul, Annemarie, 2015. "After work shopping? Employment effects of a deregulation of shop opening hours in the German retail sector," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 329-353.
    13. Schuster, Philipp & Schmitt, Carina & Traub, Stefan, 2013. "The retreat of the state from entrepreneurial activities: A convergence analysis for OECD countries, 1980–2007," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 95-112.
    14. Manuela Krause & Niklas Potrafke, 2020. "The Real Estate Transfer Tax and Government Ideology: Evidence from the German States," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 76(1), pages 100-120.
    15. Tjerk Budding & Bram Faber & Raymond (R.H.J.M.) Gradus, 2017. "Assessing Electronic Service Delivery in Municipalities," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-087/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    16. Björn Kauder & Niklas Potrafke, 2013. "Government Ideology and Tuition Fee Policy: Evidence from the German States," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 59(4), pages 628-649, December.
    17. Tsuyoshi Goto & Sandra Sekgetle & Takashi Kuramoto, 2019. "Municipal Merger and Debt Issuance in South African Municipality," OSIPP Discussion Paper 19E001, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.
    18. Björn Ekman & Jens Wilkens, 2015. "A literature review of the regional implementation of the central Swedish government’s health care reforms on choice and privatization," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-5, December.
    19. Miettinen, Topi & Poutvaara, Panu, 2014. "A market for connections," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 37-52.
    20. Yin, Kai & Miao, Qin, 2024. "Urbanization and low-carbon cities: Evidence from city-county merger in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 724-737.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    local elections; political fragmentation; localism; empirical research;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H76 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Other Expenditure Categories
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20200022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.