IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/19970047.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Network Industries, Economic Stability and Spatial Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth Button

    (George Mason University)

  • Peter Nijkamp

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Abstract

The evidence on the implications of transport for regionaleconomic and political integration is mixed. This is not surprisingsince transport is one element of a complex web of factors thatdetermine the extent to which spatial areas become integrated.There are also good reasons to expect the optimal level ofcohesion to vary between groups of regions and variations inthe degree of integration. Much of the recent attention in Europeregarding the use of transport as an instrument of integrationhas centered upon the creation of an appropriate infrastructureas illustrated by the TENs Programmes of the European Union.Notwithstanding questions concerning the suitability of thisapproach to bring about greater cohesion through investmentstrategies, there are also issues concerning the way operationsand use of transport networks can contribute to greater spatialeconomic integration. The focus of recent policies has beenthe liberalization of transport markets and the greaterinvolvement of the private sector in providing actualtransport services. There are theoretical grounds for suggesting thiscan enhance both the technical and dynamic efficiency of supplyand these tend to be supported by the emerging empirical findings.The difficulties with relying on market and competitive forcesto provide network services is the nature of supply and demandcharacteristics associated with networks may not produce a stablesolution. At the extreme they can result in deficiencies in outputand, under less theoretically rigid conditions, can lead tovolatility in supply. The result is that even where transportmay have the potential to enhance spatial cohesion this potentialwill not be completely realized. This paper, drawing in particularon the theories of Edgeworth, looks at the underlying nature of thispotential problem, examines the empirical evidence with respect tosome European transport networks and considers appropriate policyresponses.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth Button & Peter Nijkamp, 1997. "Network Industries, Economic Stability and Spatial Integration," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 97-047/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:19970047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/97047.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baumol, William J, 1982. "Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(1), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Telser, Lester G, 1996. "Competition and the Core," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 104(1), pages 85-107, February.
    3. Telser,Lester G., 1987. "A Theory of Efficient Cooperation and Competition," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521306195, September.
    4. Bittlingmayer, George, 1985. "Did Antitrust Policy Cause the Great Merger Wave?," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 28(1), pages 77-118, April.
    5. Lester G. Telser, 1994. "The Usefulness of Core Theory in Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 151-164, Spring.
    6. Sharkey, W. W., 1977. "Efficient production when demand is uncertain," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 369-384, December.
    7. Pirrong, Stephen Craig, 1992. "An Application of Core Theory to the Analysis of Ocean Shipping Markets," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(1), pages 89-131, April.
    8. Telser, Lester G, 1991. "Industry Total Cost Functions and the Status of the Core," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 225-240, March.
    9. Bittlingmayer, George, 1982. "Decreasing Average Cost and Competition: A New Look at the Addyston Pipe Case," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 25(2), pages 201-229, October.
    10. Sandler, Ralph D, 1988. "Market Share Instability in Commercial Airline Markets and the Impact of Deregulation," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 327-335, March.
    11. Van Boening, Mark V & Wilcox, Nathaniel T, 1996. "Avoidable Cost: Ride a Double Auction Roller Coaster," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 461-477, June.
    12. Gerard Debreu, 1963. "On a Theorem of Scarf," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 30(3), pages 177-180.
    13. Button, Kenneth J & Keeler, Theodore, 1993. "The Regulation of Transport Markets," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 103(419), pages 1017-1027, July.
    14. Sjostrom, William, 1989. "Collusion in Ocean Shipping: A Test of Monopoly and Empty Core Model s," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(5), pages 1160-1179, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabio Domanico, 2007. "The European airline industry: law and economics of low cost carriers," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 199-221, June.
    2. Zhang, Yahua & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "COVID-19 and bailout policy: The case of Virgin Australia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 174-181.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Button, Kenneth, 2003. "Does the theory of the ‘core’ explain why airlines fail to cover their long-run costs of capital?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 5-14.
    2. Button, Kenneth, 2005. "How Stable are Scheduled Air Transport Markets," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 27-48, January.
    3. Lester G. Telser, 1994. "The Usefulness of Core Theory in Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 151-164, Spring.
    4. Productivity Commission, 2005. "Review of Part X of the Trade Practices Act 1974: International Liner Cargo Shipping," Inquiry Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 32.
    5. Waters II, William G., 2007. "Evolution of Railroad Economics," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 11-67, January.
    6. Zhang, Yahua & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "COVID-19 and bailout policy: The case of Virgin Australia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 174-181.
    7. Rau, Philipp & Spinler, Stefan, 2017. "Alliance formation in a cooperative container shipping game: Performance of a real options investment approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 155-175.
    8. DAVID A. Butz, 1993. "Ocean Shipping Economics: Free Trade And Antitrust Implications," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 11(3), pages 69-80, July.
    9. Mike Fusillo, 2013. "The Stability of Market Shares in Liner Shipping," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 42(1), pages 85-106, February.
    10. Schmitt, Nicolas & Weder, Rolf, 1998. "Sunk costs and cartel formation: Theory and application to the dyestuff industry," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 197-220, August.
    11. Lindsay, Luke, 2018. "Shapley value based pricing for auctions and exchanges," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 170-181.
    12. Aivazian, Varouj A. & Callen, Jeffrey L., 2023. "The Coase Theorem and the empty core: Inspecting the entrails after four decades," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    13. Dick, Andrew R., 1992. "Japanese Antitrust Law and the Competitive Mix," Working Papers 74, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    14. Wu, Wei-Ming, 2009. "An approach for measuring the optimal fleet capacity: Evidence from the container shipping lines in Taiwan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 118-126, November.
    15. Jingang Zhao, 1998. "Non-Empty Core as a Precondition for Horizontal Merger: Core Existence without Using Balancedness," Working Papers 98-07, Ohio State University, Department of Economics.
    16. Iwan Bos & Erik Pot, 2012. "On the possibility of welfare-enhancing hard core cartels," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 199-216, November.
    17. Dennis Mueller, 1996. "Antimerger policy in the United States: History and lessons," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 23(3), pages 229-253, October.
    18. Takuma Matsuda & Suguru Otani, 2022. "Unified Container Shipping Industry Data From 1966: Freight Rate, Shipping Quantity, Newbuilding, Secondhand, and Scrap Price," Papers 2211.16292, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    19. Edlin, Aaron & Farrell, Joseph, 2011. "Freedom to Trade and the Competitive Process," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt0xg2h885, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    20. Stephen Martin, 2012. "Market Structure and Market Performance," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 40(2), pages 87-108, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:19970047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.