IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tep/tepprr/rr11-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comment développer les emplois favorables à la biodiversité en Ile-De-France

Author

Listed:
  • Jean De Bier
  • Céline Emond
  • Yannick L'Horty
  • Laeticia Tuffery

Abstract

Partant d’une analyse monographique des secteurs d’activités franciliens ayant des effets favorables sur la biodiversité, nous sommes en mesure de recenser les bio-emplois en Ile-de-France et les emplois induits à l’échelle nationale. Les « bio-emplois » sont ceux dont l’activité ou une part de l’activité contribue à la connaissance, la gestion, la protection, la valorisation et la restauration de la biodiversité de façon intentionnelle ou non, et ceux contribuant à la prise en compte des enjeux de biodiversité dans les autres activités économiques. Ils comprennent aussi les activités de communication et de financement de projets favorables à la biodiversité. La biodiversité est ici définie comme l’ensemble du tissu vivant, de ses fonctions écologiques et de ses services écosystémiques. Selon nos estimations, les bio-emplois ne représentent aujourd’hui qu’1 emploi sur 1000 en Ile-de-France, soient 5090 bio-emplois en effectifs occupés (EO) et 6400 en équivalent temps plein (ETP). Ils se répartissent, à plus de 70%, entre les activités associatives, les activités de recherche et développement et l’administration publique. A cela s’ajoutent 2355 emplois nationaux en EO et 2900 ETP, induits par les bio-emplois franciliens, soit un total de presque 7450 bio-emplois et emplois induits en EO et 9300 pour une comptabilisation en ETP. Ainsi, pour deux bio-emplois, en moyenne, un emploi induit est créé. Pour effectuer ce dénombrement, nous avons construit un outil de simulation, baptisé SPIDER, qui nous a permis de quantifier différents scenarii d’évolution des bio-emplois ainsi que les effets de politiques régionales variées sur les bio-emplois. Ces simulations montrent qu’une politique mixte combinant variation de la production et changement de pratiques est préférable à une politique s’appuyant sur un seul de ces instruments. Nos simulations montrent également que le degré de ciblage optimal de la politique mixte doit couvrir tous les secteurs intégrant des bio-emplois (s
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Jean De Bier & Céline Emond & Yannick L'Horty & Laeticia Tuffery, 2011. "Comment développer les emplois favorables à la biodiversité en Ile-De-France," TEPP Research Report 2011-02, TEPP.
    • Handle: RePEc:tep:tepprr:rr11-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tepp-repec.eu/RePEc/files/tepprr/TEPP-RR-2011-02-jb-ce-yl-lt.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lawrence H. Goulder, 1994. "Environmental Taxation and the "Double Dividend:" A Reader's Guide," NBER Working Papers 4896, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Goulder Lawrence H., 1995. "Effects of Carbon Taxes in an Economy with Prior Tax Distortions: An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Analysis," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 271-297, November.
    3. Carraro,Carlo & Siniscalco,Domenico (ed.), 1997. "New Directions in the Economic Theory of the Environment," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521590891, January.
    4. Lans Bovenberg, A. & de Mooij, Ruud A., 1994. "Environmental taxes and labor-market distortions," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 655-683, December.
    5. Lawrence H. Goulder, 1994. "Environmental Taxation and the "Double Dividend": A Reader's Guide," CESifo Working Paper Series 74, CESifo.
    6. Jean de Beir & Céline Emond & Yannick L’Horty & Laetitia Tuffery, 2015. "Les emplois favorables à la biodiversité en Île-de-France," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(1), pages 143-155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2001. "Le double dividende. Les approches théoriques," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 16(2), pages 119-147.
    2. Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline & Mouez Fodha, 2011. "Verdissement de la fiscalité. À qui profite le double dividende ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(1), pages 409-431.
    3. Anthony Letsoalo & James Blignaut & Theuns de Wet & Martin de Wit & Sebastiaan Hess & Richard S.J. Tol & Jan van Heerden, 2005. "Triple Dividends Of Water Consumption Charges In South Africa," Working Papers FNU-62, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Apr 2005.
    4. Quentin Perrier & Philippe Quirion, 2017. "La transition énergétique est-elle favorable aux branches à fort contenu en emploi ? Une analyse input-output pour la France," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 127(5), pages 851-887.
    5. Annegrete Bruvoll & Karin Ibenholt, 1998. "Green Throughput Taxation: Environmental and Economic Consequences," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(4), pages 387-401, December.
    6. Hauch, Jens & Pilegaard, Ninette & Bjørner, Thomas Bue, 2007. "Danish Transport Regulation and Labour Market Effects," Nationaløkonomisk tidsskrift, Nationaløkonomisk Forening, vol. 2007(1), pages 215-236.
    7. Chiroleu-Assouline, Mireille & Fodha, Mouez, 2006. "Double dividend hypothesis, golden rule and welfare distribution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 323-335, May.
    8. Jean-Christophe Caffet, 2005. "Health effects and optimal environmental taxes in welfare state countries," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques v05049, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    9. Klaus Conrad & Andreas Löschel, 2005. "Recycling of Eco-Taxes, Labor Market Effects and the True Cost of Labor- a CGE Analysis," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 259-278, November.
    10. Bovenberg, A. Lans & van der Ploeg, Frederick, 1996. "Optimal taxation, public goods and environmental policy with involuntary unemployment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 59-83, October.
    11. Hansen, Kristian Schultz & Enemark, Ulrika & Foldspang, Anders, 2007. "Indkomst og dødelighed i en dansk befolkningsstikprøve," Nationaløkonomisk tidsskrift, Nationaløkonomisk Forening, vol. 2007(1), pages 241-264.
    12. Walls, Margaret & Hanson, Jean, 1996. "Distributional Impacts of an Environmental Tax Shift: The Case of Motor Vehicle Emissions Taxes," Discussion Papers 10895, Resources for the Future.
    13. Petersen, Liv Bangsbo, 2007. "Velfærdsvægte for forskellige indkomstgrupper i Danmark," Nationaløkonomisk tidsskrift, Nationaløkonomisk Forening, vol. 2007(1), pages 265-287.
    14. Ross McKitrick, 1997. "Double Dividend Environmental Taxation and Canadian Carbon Emissions Control," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 23(4), pages 417-438, December.
    15. Nielsen, Max & Cozzari, Bruno & Løkkegaard, Jørgen & Eriksen, Guri & Flaaten, Ola & Gudmundsson, Eyjolfur & Petersen, Kari & Waldo, Staffan, 2007. "Samfundsøkonomisk afkast af nordiske fiskerier," Nationaløkonomisk tidsskrift, Nationaløkonomisk Forening, vol. 2007(1), pages 164-187.
    16. Malchow-Møller, Nikolaj & Munch, Jakob Roland & Schroll, Sanne & Skaksen, Jan Rose, 2007. "Holdninger til immigration - Er danskerne specielle?," Nationaløkonomisk tidsskrift, Nationaløkonomisk Forening, vol. 2007(1), pages 59-82.
    17. Perrier, Quentin & Quirion, Philippe, 2018. "How shifting investment towards low-carbon sectors impacts employment: Three determinants under scrutiny," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 464-483.
    18. Simon Baptist & Cameron Hepburn, 2012. "Intermediate inputs and economic productivity," GRI Working Papers 95, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    19. Jean-Charles Hourcade & Frédéric Ghersi, 1998. "De Kyoto à Buenos Aires : l'émergence d'un nouveau contexte pour la compétition industrielle," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 83(1), pages 27-45.
    20. Raúl O'Ryan & Sebastian Miller & Carlos J. de Miguel, 2001. "Environmental Taxes, Inefficient Subsidies and Income Distribution in Chile: A CGE framework," Documentos de Trabajo 98, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tep:tepprr:rr11-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sylvain (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/teppnfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.