IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/0802215.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Performance Measurment of State-Owned Banks in Turkish Banking Sector with Grey Relational Analysis Method

Author

Listed:
  • S. Öznur Sakinc

    (Hitit University)

Abstract

Banking sector has a considerable impact on the development and growth of the national economy. Increase in the performance of this sector having an important place in the financial system of country, means to positive effects on the general economy. Today, importance of globalization and private capitalis increasing. But State-owned banks in Turkish Banking Sector have an important share of 30%. The main goal of private banks is profitability, so they don?t support the activities with low return, even though the people need. For these reasons state-owned banks were selected, in this study for measuring their performance. Performance measurement involves the process of assessing and reporting of the business activities in terms of success, effectiveness and timing. Sustainability in Performance Measurement provides a significant instrument for feedback of business for the planning in the next period. Business might develop their own service and product quality and they progress strategies to increase the performances of employees, revise their goals and make some revisions in the budget if it needs.Thus, an increase will be supplied in the efficiency and effectiveness of business. In this study, The Performances of State-owned banks in Turkish Banking Sector are analyzed with grey relational analysis method.In the analysis, four years of financial data is used related with banks between 2010-213 years. These data were analyzed by 15 ration which determine; capital adequacy, liquidity, asset quality and profitability criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Öznur Sakinc, 2014. "Performance Measurment of State-Owned Banks in Turkish Banking Sector with Grey Relational Analysis Method," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0802215, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:0802215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/13th-international-academic-conference-antibes/table-of-content/detail?cid=8&iid=065&rid=2215
    File Function: First version, 2014
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng, Cheng-Min & Wang, Rong-Tsu, 2000. "Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 133-142.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahmut BAKIR & Şahap AKAN & Kasım KIRACI & Darjan KARABASEVIC & Dragisa STANUJKIC & Gabrijela POPOVIC, 2020. "Multiple-Criteria Approach of the Operational Performance Evaluation in the Airline Industry: Evidence from the Emerging Markets," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 149-172, July.
    2. Francis, Graham & Humphreys, Ian & Fry, Jackie, 2005. "The nature and prevalence of the use of performance measurement techniques by airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 207-217.
    3. Thanh Ngo & Kan Wai Hong Tsui, 2022. "Estimating the confidence intervals for DEA efficiency scores of Asia-Pacific airlines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3411-3434, September.
    4. Chiuling Lu & Ann Yang & Jui-Feng Huang, 2015. "Bankruptcy predictions for U.S. air carrier operations: a study of financial data," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 39(3), pages 574-589, July.
    5. Faruk Dayi & Ali Cilesiz & Mustafa Yucel, 2024. "Strategic Management of Clean Energy Investments: Financial Performance Insights by Using BWM-based VIKOR and TOPSIS Methods," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 566-574, September.
    6. Sami Özcan & Murat Serçemeli & Ali Kemal Çelik, 2024. "Analyzing the Effects of Covid-19 Pandemic on the Financial Performance of Turkish Listed Companies on Borsa Istanbul using the Entropy-based Grey Relational Analysis," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 109-124, September.
    7. Wang, Rong-Tsu & Ho, Chien-Ta & Feng, Cheng-Min & Yang, Yung-Kai, 2004. "A comparative analysis of the operational performance of Taiwan's major airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 353-360.
    8. Mahmut Baydaş & Dragan Pamučar, 2022. "Determining Objective Characteristics of MCDM Methods under Uncertainty: An Exploration Study with Financial Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Ioannis E. Tsolas, 2020. "Financial Performance Assessment of Construction Firms by Means of RAM-Based Composite Indicators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Ali Katrancı & Nilsen Kundakcı & Dragan Pamucar, 2025. "Financial performance evaluation of firms in BIST 100 index with ITARA and COBRA methods," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    11. Hasan Dinçer & Ozlem Olgu Akdeniz & Umit Hacioglu, 2018. "Competitive strategy selection in the European banking sector using a hybrid decision-making approach," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 36(1), pages 213-242.
    12. Kasım KİRACI & Mehmet YAŞAR, 2020. "The Determinants of Airline Operational Performance: An Empirical Study on Major World Airlines," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 28(43).
    13. Roman Vavrek & Jiří Bečica, 2020. "Capital City as a Factor of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis—Application on Transport Companies in the Czech Republic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Low, Joyce M.W. & Lee, Byung Kwon, 2014. "Effects of internal resources on airline competitiveness," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 23-32.
    15. Salih YILDIZ & Emel YILDIZ, 2015. "Service Quality Evaluation of Restaurants Using The Ahp And Topsis Method," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, KSP Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 53-61, June.
    16. Yi Hsin Lin & Yu Hern Chang, 2008. "Significant Factors of Aviation Insurance and Risk Management Strategy: An Empirical Study of Taiwanese Airline Carriers," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 453-461, April.
    17. Ilyas Akhisar & Necla Tunay, 2015. "Performance Ranking of Turkish Life Insurance Companies Using AHP and TOPSIS," MIC 2015: Managing Sustainable Growth; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Portorož, Slovenia, 28–30 May 2015,, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.
    18. Bruno Ricca & Massimiliano Ferrara & Salvatore Loprevite, 2023. "Searching for an effective accounting-based score of firm performance: a comparative study between different synthesis techniques," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3575-3602, August.
    19. Bazargan, Massoud & Vasigh, Bijan, 2003. "Size versus efficiency: a case study of US commercial airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 187-193.
    20. Muhammad Shaukat Malik & Muhammad Irfan & Samavia Munir, 2024. "Developing a Sustainable Finance Index and Its Implications on Inter-Intra Banking Sector," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Banking Sector; Performance In Banks; Performance Measurement; Grey Relational Analyze Method; State-Owned Banks;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G29 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:0802215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.