IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/see/wpaper/7.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Patterns of Preservation, Restructuring and Survival: Science and Technology Policy in Russia in the Post Soviet Era

Author

Listed:
  • Slavo Radosevic

    (UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies)

Abstract

This paper analyses the role of S&T policy in the adjustment and restructuring of the Russian S&T system in the post-Soviet period. The principal argument is that the adjustment of the S&T system in Russia has been evolving between the ‘preservation of S&T potential’, its restructuring, and survival strategies developed by researchers and R&D organisations. The interaction of these factors explains much of the pace and patterns of restructuring of Russian S&T system observed in the post-Soviet period. The model that emerged is the post-Soviet R&D model, which is relevant for Russia as well as for other CIS. The paper analyses strategic options available to Russian policy makers

Suggested Citation

  • Slavo Radosevic, 2002. "Patterns of Preservation, Restructuring and Survival: Science and Technology Policy in Russia in the Post Soviet Era," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 7, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    • Handle: RePEc:see:wpaper:7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/17574/1/17574.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. N. von Tunzelmann, 1995. "Technology and Industrial Progress," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 437.
    2. Kontorovich, Vladimir, 1994. "The future of the Soviet science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 113-121, March.
    3. Levan Mindeli, 1998. "Actual problems of Russia's science and innovation policy," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 63-70, August.
    4. Igor Egorov, 1996. "Trends in transforming R&D potential in Russia and Ukraine in the early 1990s," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 202-214, August.
    5. Leonid V Yurevich, 1996. "Ukraine: Developing innovation policies for a recently independent economy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(5), pages 266-277, October.
    6. Radosevic, Slavo & Auriol, Laudeline, 1999. "Patterns of restructuring in research, development and innovation activities in central and eastern European countries: an analysis based on S&T indicators1," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 351-376, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karaulova, Maria & Shackleton, Oliver & Liu, Weishu & Gök, Abdullah & Shapira, Philip, 2017. "Institutional change and innovation system transformation: A tale of two academies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 196-207.
    2. Andrei A. Ilin & Ksenia M. Belik, 2020. "The Advent Of Grants: Personal Experiences Of Grant-Based Funding In The 1990s Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 201/HUM/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Irina Dezhina, 2006. "Mechanisms of Federal Financing of Science in Russia," Research Paper Series, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 99P, pages 130-130.
    4. Klarin, Anton & Sharmelly, Rifat, 2024. "Inter-organizational networking in emerging markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Kravtsova, Victoria & Radosevic, Slavo, 2012. "Are systems of innovation in Eastern Europe efficient?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 109-126.
    6. Török, Ádám, 2006. "Az európai felsőoktatás versenyképessége és a lisszaboni célkitűzések. Mennyire hihetünk a nemzetközi egyetemi rangsoroknak? [The competitiveness of Europes higher education and the Lisbon targets.," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 310-329.
    7. Toleubayev, Kazbek & Jansen, Kees & van Huis, Arnold, 2010. "Commodification of science and the production of public goods: Plant protection research in Kazakhstan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 411-421, April.
    8. Wang, Peijie & Li, Fan, 2021. "Science, technology and innovation policy in Russia and China – Mapping and comparisons in objectives, instruments and implementation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    9. Gogodze, Joseph & Uridia, Merab, 2010. "Georgian Research and Development System in 1996-2005," MPRA Paper 26333, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Ekaterina Albats & Irina Fiegenbaum & James A. Cunningham, 2018. "A micro level study of university industry collaborative lifecycle key performance indicators," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 389-431, April.
    11. Mihailova, Irina, 2015. "Outcomes of learning through JVs for local parent firms in transition economies: Evidence from Russia," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 220-233.
    12. Denis Ivanov, 2014. "Transition and path-dependence in knowledge-intensive industry location: Case of Russian professional services," ERSA conference papers ersa14p767, European Regional Science Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Slavo Radosevic, 2004. "A Two‐Tier or Multi‐Tier Europe? Assessing the Innovation Capacities of Central and East European Countries in the Enlarged EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 641-666, September.
    2. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    3. Jan Fagerberg, 2003. "Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 125-159, April.
    4. Wali Ayad Ayid, 2014. "The role of geography in the analysis of industrial development strategies within the spatial organisation of a region," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 24(24), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Toleubayev, Kazbek & Jansen, Kees & van Huis, Arnold, 2010. "Commodification of science and the production of public goods: Plant protection research in Kazakhstan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 411-421, April.
    6. Chan, Felix & Marinova, Dora & McAleer, Michael, 2004. "Modelling the asymmetric volatility of electronics patents in the USA," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 169-184.
    7. Nomaler, Önder & Verspagen, Bart, 2022. "Some new views on product space and related diversification," MERIT Working Papers 2022-011, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    8. Diego de Queiroz Machado & Ana Silvia Rocha Ipiranga, 2013. "Characteristics and performance of knowledge networks in the biotechnology sector," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 17(3), pages 350-367.
    9. Arina Matvejeva, 2014. "Determinants of persistence in innovation: evidence from the case study of the 'Eye Microsurgery' Complex," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5-6), pages 544-562, September.
    10. Rogo, Francesco & Cricelli, Livio & Grimaldi, Michele, 2014. "Assessing the performance of open innovation practices: A case study of a community of innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 60-80.
    11. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/2530 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Slavo Radosevic, 2003. "The emerging industrial architecture of the wider Europe: The co-evolution of industrial and political structures," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 29, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    13. Kravtsova, Victoria & Radosevic, Slavo, 2012. "Are systems of innovation in Eastern Europe efficient?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 109-126.
    14. Attila Havas, 2016. "Social and Business Innovations: Are Common Measurement Approaches Possible?," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 10(2 (eng)), pages 58-80.
    15. Radosevic, Slavo, 1999. "Transformation of science and technology systems into systems of innovation in central and eastern Europe: the emerging patterns and determinants," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3-4), pages 277-320, December.
    16. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2530 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Peter Howard-Jones & Jens Hölscher, 2020. "The Influence Of The Washington Consensus Programme On The Transitional Economies Of Eastern Europe – A Firm-Level Analysis," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 65(226), pages 9-44, July – Se.
    18. Jan Fagerberg & Martin Srholec, 2005. "Catching up: What are the Critical Factors for success?," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20050401, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    19. Slavo Radosevic & Esin Yoruk, 2014. "Are there global shifts in the world science base? Analysing the catching up and falling behind of world regions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 1897-1924, December.
    20. Jerry Courvisanos, 2012. "Political Economy of Innovation and Sustainable Development," Chapters, in: Blandine Laperche & Nadine Levratto & Dimitri Uzunidis (ed.), Crisis, Innovation and Sustainable Development, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    21. Claudiu Tiberiu Albulescu & Camélia Turcu, 2022. "Productivity, financial performance, and corporate governance: evidence from Romanian R&D firms," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(51), pages 5956-5975, November.
    22. Nuvolari, Alessandro & Tartari, Valentina, 2011. "Bennet Woodcroft and the value of English patents, 1617-1841," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 97-115, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Russia; S&T policy; R&D;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:see:wpaper:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csescuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.