IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v17y2013i3993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics and performance of knowledge networks in the biotechnology sector

Author

Listed:
  • Diego de Queiroz Machado
  • Ana Silvia Rocha Ipiranga

Abstract

This research aimed to analyze the properties and typologies of a biotechnology sector network with regard to their relationships, attributes and performance in research and production of innovations. For this purpose, it had as its empirical field the Northeast Biotechnology Network, using patent reports produced by the network as a data source. In order to track the relationship networks between members, groups, institutions and projects, social networking analysis tools were used, making it possible to construct relationship matrices between the laboratories and companies and, lastly, researchers. In total, 117 researchers were identified, distributed among 18 research centers and 47 laboratories or companies. Their projects are distributed across three main areas: agriculture, industrial and health, the latter being the strongest of the three with more patents produced and more institutions involved in research. The weak density presented by the network, at all analysis levels, strengthens the necessity for integration strategies. Also, it indicates the possibility for new relationships between agents that are still isolated. However, it does not diminish its importance for economic development in the region in which it operates.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego de Queiroz Machado & Ana Silvia Rocha Ipiranga, 2013. "Characteristics and performance of knowledge networks in the biotechnology sector," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 17(3), pages 350-367.
    • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:17:y:2013:i:3:993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/993/989
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/993/989
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melissa Peron e Sá & José Vitor Bomtempo & Cristiane Quental, 1998. "Terceirização no processamento final da indústria farmacêutica e veterinária," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 2(2), pages 85-101.
    2. Bruno Latour, 2013. "Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory," Journal of Economic Sociology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 73-87.
    3. Godoy, Arilda Schmidt, 1995. "Pesquisa qualitativa: tipos fundamentais," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 35(3), May.
    4. G. N. von Tunzelmann, 1995. "Technology and Industrial Progress," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 437.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    2. Jan Fagerberg, 2003. "Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 125-159, April.
    3. Wali Ayad Ayid, 2014. "The role of geography in the analysis of industrial development strategies within the spatial organisation of a region," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 24(24), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Chan, Felix & Marinova, Dora & McAleer, Michael, 2004. "Modelling the asymmetric volatility of electronics patents in the USA," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 169-184.
    5. Nomaler, Önder & Verspagen, Bart, 2022. "Some new views on product space and related diversification," MERIT Working Papers 2022-011, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    6. Mascarenhas, André Ofenhejm, 2002. "Etnografia e cultura organizacional: uma contribuição da antropologia à administração de empresas," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 42(2), April.
    7. Arina Matvejeva, 2014. "Determinants of persistence in innovation: evidence from the case study of the 'Eye Microsurgery' Complex," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5-6), pages 544-562, September.
    8. Rogo, Francesco & Cricelli, Livio & Grimaldi, Michele, 2014. "Assessing the performance of open innovation practices: A case study of a community of innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 60-80.
    9. Radosevic, Slavo, 2003. "Patterns of preservation, restructuring and survival: science and technology policy in Russia in post-Soviet era," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1105-1124, June.
    10. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/2530 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Slavo Radosevic, 2003. "The emerging industrial architecture of the wider Europe: The co-evolution of industrial and political structures," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 29, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    12. Attila Havas, 2016. "Social and Business Innovations: Are Common Measurement Approaches Possible?," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 10(2 (eng)), pages 58-80.
    13. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2530 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Jan Fagerberg & Martin Srholec, 2005. "Catching up: What are the Critical Factors for success?," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20050401, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    15. Slavo Radosevic, 2004. "A Two‐Tier or Multi‐Tier Europe? Assessing the Innovation Capacities of Central and East European Countries in the Enlarged EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 641-666, September.
    16. Jerry Courvisanos, 2012. "Political Economy of Innovation and Sustainable Development," Chapters, in: Blandine Laperche & Nadine Levratto & Dimitri Uzunidis (ed.), Crisis, Innovation and Sustainable Development, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Nuvolari, Alessandro & Tartari, Valentina, 2011. "Bennet Woodcroft and the value of English patents, 1617-1841," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 97-115, January.
    18. Alessandro Nuvolari & Michelangelo Vasta, 2015. "Independent invention in Italy during the Liberal Age, 1861–1913," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 68(3), pages 858-886, August.
    19. Barro, L. C. & Chadad, Fabio. R. & Claro, Danny P., 2007. "Políticas Públicas e Aprendizagem Tecnológica no Brasil: Os Casos dos Setores de Energia Elétrica e de Bens de Informática," Insper Working Papers wpe_83, Insper Working Paper, Insper Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa.
    20. Raysa Rocha & Paulo Pinheiro, 2021. "Business Education: Filling the Gaps in the Leader’s Awareness Concerning Organizational Phronesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    21. Alessandro Nuvolari, 2004. "Collective invention during the British Industrial Revolution: the case of the Cornish pumping engine," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 28(3), pages 347-363, May.
    22. Slavo Radosevic & Esin Yoruk, 2016. "A New Metrics Of Technology Upgrading: The Central And East European Countries In A Comparative Perspective," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 2016-2, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:17:y:2013:i:3:993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.