IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v23y1996i4p202-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends in transforming R&D potential in Russia and Ukraine in the early 1990s

Author

Listed:
  • Igor Egorov

Abstract

A comparison is made between the developments in R&D in Russia and Ukraine since they became independent Forecasts about R&D are gloomy: compromises are essential to make transition to a market-oriented economy smoother and S&T must play a more significant role. Currently there is a brain drain of scientists at three levels: leaving the country; moving to other jobs; and the hidden effect of maintaining a workplace but conducting other work. Three solutions are offered: selected state protection for some S&T areas; restructuring the sources of research funding; and the development of an ‘educational wing’ within research institutes. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Igor Egorov, 1996. "Trends in transforming R&D potential in Russia and Ukraine in the early 1990s," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 202-214, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:23:y:1996:i:4:p:202-214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/spp/23.4.202
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcin Kozak & Lutz Bornmann & Loet Leydesdorff, 2015. "How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1101-1117, February.
    2. Radosevic, Slavo, 2003. "Patterns of preservation, restructuring and survival: science and technology policy in Russia in post-Soviet era," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1105-1124, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:23:y:1996:i:4:p:202-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.