IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sap/wpaper/wp251.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Health Disparities in Europe: Insights from a Cluster Analysis of Healthcare Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Debora Di Gioacchino
  • Emanuela Ghignoni
  • Laura Sabani

Abstract

Healthcare typologies are valuable instruments for comparing the similarities and discrepancies in how nations finance, deliver, and structure their healthcare systems. This study concentrates on three distinct aspects of healthcare systems: (1) the overall level of healthcare expenditure; (2) the distribution between public and private funding; (3) the emphasis on primary care versus secondary care. We examine 25 European countries to investigate empirically how these nations cluster based on these three features. To accomplish this goal, we undertake a cluster analysis combining data on healthcare expenditure with metrics on the public-private funding mix and indicators of healthcare sectional orientation, predominantly utilizing OECD Health Data and WHO country reports. The results suggest the identification of at least five distinct healthcare system types. Subsequently, we employ these typologies to examine cross-national differences in health outcomes and health inequalities. Consistent with expectations, our findings show a robust association between healthcare expenditure, particularly public expenditure, and health outcome metrics, alongside a negative correlation with socio-economic health disparities. Primary care emphasis does not appear to correlate with improved health outcomes, nor with reduced health disparities. Finally, our findings challenge the purported decongestion effect associated with voluntary health insurance

Suggested Citation

  • Debora Di Gioacchino & Emanuela Ghignoni & Laura Sabani, 2024. "Health Disparities in Europe: Insights from a Cluster Analysis of Healthcare Systems," Working Papers in Public Economics 251, Department of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Roma.
  • Handle: RePEc:sap:wpaper:wp251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.dipecodir.it/wpsap/data/wp251.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reibling, Nadine & Ariaans, Mareike & Wendt, Claus, 2019. "Worlds of Healthcare: A Healthcare System Typology of OECD Countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(7), pages 611-620.
    2. Martinussen, Pål E. & Magnussen, Jon, 2019. "Is having private health insurance associated with less support for public healthcare? Evidence from the Norwegian NHS," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(7), pages 675-680.
    3. Marzena Tambor & Jacek Klich & Alicja Domagała, 2021. "Financing Healthcare in Central and Eastern European Countries: How Far Are We from Universal Health Coverage?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Denise Doiron & Denzil G. Fiebig & Meliyanni Johar & Agne Suziedelyte, 2015. "Does self-assessed health measure health?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 180-194, January.
    5. Besley, Timothy & Coate, Stephen, 1991. "Public Provision of Private Goods and the Redistribution of Income," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(4), pages 979-984, September.
    6. Besley, Timothy & Hall, John & Preston, Ian, 1999. "The demand for private health insurance: do waiting lists matter?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 155-181, May.
    7. Iversen, Tor, 1997. "The effect of a private sector on the waiting time in a national health service," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 381-396, August.
    8. Böhm, Katharina & Schmid, Achim & Götze, Ralf & Landwehr, Claudia & Rothgang, Heinz, 2013. "Five types of OECD healthcare systems: Empirical results of a deductive classification," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 258-269.
    9. Johnston, Bridget M. & Burke, Sara & Barry, Sarah & Normand, Charles & Ní Fhallúin, Maebh & Thomas, Steve, 2019. "Private health expenditure in Ireland: Assessing the affordability of private financing of health care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(10), pages 963-969.
    10. Smith, Samantha & Connolly, Sheelah, 2020. "Re-thinking unmet need for health care: introducing a dynamic perspective," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 440-457, October.
    11. Ramos, Luís Moura & Quintal, Carlota & Lourenço, Óscar & Antunes, Micaela, 2019. "Unmet needs across Europe: Disclosing knowledge beyond the ordinary measure," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(12), pages 1155-1162.
    12. Håvard T Rydland & Erlend L Fjær & Terje A Eikemo & Tim Huijts & Clare Bambra & Claus Wendt & Ivana Kulhánová & Pekka Martikainen & Chris Dibben & Ramunė Kalėdienė & Carme Borrell & Mall Leinsalu & Ma, 2020. "Educational inequalities in mortality amenable to healthcare. A comparison of European healthcare systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Rhema Vaithianathan, 2002. "Will Subsidising Private Health Insurance Help the Public Health System?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 78(242), pages 277-283, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clara Andresciani & Debora Di Gioacchino & Laura Sabani, 2024. "The political economy of the public/private mix in healthcare: assessing the decongestion effect argument," Working Papers - Economics wp2024_23.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clara Andresciani & Debora Di Gioacchino & Laura Sabani, 2024. "The political economy of the public/private mix in healthcare: assessing the decongestion effect argument," Working Papers - Economics wp2024_23.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    2. Panos Pashardes & Nicoletta Pashourtidou, 2011. "Consumer welfare from publicly supplemented private goods: age and income effects on demand for health care," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 865-885, December.
    3. Costa-Font, Joan & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada, 2022. "Does devolution influence the choice and quality of public (vs private) health care?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 632-653.
    4. Joan Costa-Font & Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell, 2019. "Regional Decentralisation and the Demand for Public Health Care," Studies on the Spanish Economy eee2019-41, FEDEA.
    5. Maurice March & Fred Schroyen, 2005. "Can a Mixed Health Care System be Desirable on Equity Grounds?," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 107(1), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Joan Costa & Jaume Garcia, 2001. "Demand for private health insurance: Is there a quality gap?," Economics Working Papers 531, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    7. Simona GRASSI, 2006. "On the characteristics of a mixed system of provision of a private good. An application to health care," Departmental Working Papers 2006-14, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    8. Joan Costa‐Font & Jaume García‐Villar, 2009. "Risk Attitudes And The Demand For Private Health Insurance: The Importance Of ‘Captive Preferences’," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(4), pages 499-519, December.
    9. Haizhen Mou, 2012. "The political economy of public health expenditure and wait times in a public‐private mixed health care system," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(4), pages 1640-1666, November.
    10. Sergi Jimenez & Natalia Jorgensen & José María Labeaga, 2008. "Immigration and the Demand for Health in Spain," Working Papers 2008-38, FEDEA.
    11. Chiara Canta & Marie-Louise Leroux, 2016. "Public and Private Hospitals, Congestion, and Redistribution," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 18(1), pages 42-66, February.
    12. Joan Costa-i-Font & Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell, 2017. "Can Regional Decentralisation Shift Health Care Preferences?," CESifo Working Paper Series 6779, CESifo.
    13. Joan Costa & Jaume Garcia, 2003. "Demand for private health insurance: how important is the quality gap?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(7), pages 587-599, July.
    14. Karl Ove Aarbu, 2010. "Demand Patterns for Treatment Insurance in Norway," CESifo Working Paper Series 3021, CESifo.
    15. Finn, Claire & Harmon, Colm, 2006. "A dynamic model of demand for private health insurance in Ireland," Papers HRBWP17, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    16. Daniele Fabbri & Chiara Monfardini, 2016. "Opt Out or Top Up? Voluntary Health Care Insurance and the Public vs. Private Substitution," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 78(1), pages 75-93, February.
    17. Atella, Vincenzo & Deb, Partha, 2008. "Are primary care physicians, public and private sector specialists substitutes or complements? Evidence from a simultaneous equations model for count data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 770-785, May.
    18. Marenzi, Anna & Rizzi, Dino & Zanette, Michele, 2021. "Incentives for voluntary health insurance in a national health system: Evidence from Italy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(6), pages 685-692.
    19. Parry, Ian, 2001. "On the Efficiency of Public and Private Health Care Systems: An Application to Alternative Health Policies in the United Kingdom," RFF Working Paper Series dp-01-07, Resources for the Future.
    20. Jeremiah Hurley & Rhema Vaithianathana & Thomas F. Crossley & Deborah Cobb-Clark, 2001. "Parallel Private Health Insurance in Australia: A Cautionary Tale and Lessons for Canada," Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series 2001-12, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    healthcare systems; public–private mix; primary vs secondary care; voluntary health insurance; health outcomes;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H42 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Publicly Provided Private Goods
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I14 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Inequality
    • C40 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sap:wpaper:wp251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Luisa Giuriato (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ecodir.web.uniroma1.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.