IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sal/celpdp/0170.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multiple tasks, hard information gathering, muted incentives and specialization by project

Author

Listed:
  • Bennardo, Alberrto

    (Department of Economics and Statistics - University of Salerno)

  • Abatemarco, Antonio

    (CELPE - CEnter for Labor and Political Economics, University of Salerno, Italy)

Abstract

Managers perform two heterogenous set of tasks: coordination of production and information gathering activities; moreover, their monetary incentives commonly use few contractible signals. Why are these patterns so common ? Is the development of information markets going to generate Smithian specialization and promote decentralization of information gathering ? How is this going to affect managerial incentive schemes ? Our paper aims at making an initial step toward addressing all these issues within a simple multiple task set-up. We identify an informational complementarity, shaping all the main trade-offs of our analysis, which leads to the following results. First, monetary incentives for information gathering activities are optimally muted under mild conditions on actions' disutility, if the operational value of information is not "very large", or the implementation activity is very productive and very costly to incentivize. Second, public contractible information crowds-in information gathering within firms. Third, specialization by project, instead of by function, turns out to always be second best optimal in the absence of strong substitution e§ects across activities. Even in the presence of sizeable substitution e§ects, tasks' integration is still preferred, provided that the cost of incentivizing information gathering and/or the productivity of both activities are large enough.

Suggested Citation

  • Bennardo, Alberrto & Abatemarco, Antonio, 2024. "Multiple tasks, hard information gathering, muted incentives and specialization by project," CELPE Discussion Papers 170, CELPE - CEnter for Labor and Political Economics, University of Salerno, Italy.
  • Handle: RePEc:sal:celpdp:0170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.celpe.unisa.it/uploads/rescue/784/1048/170-dp.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Information gathering; multiple tasks; incentives; value of information;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • D86 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Economics of Contract Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sal:celpdp:0170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roberto Dell'Anno (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesalit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.