IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/2869.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Ratio of Project Management Tools and 'Classical' Public Service in OECD Countries and Developing Countries
[Соотношение Инструментов Проектного Управления И «Классической» Государственной Службы В Странах Оэср И Развивающихся Странах]

Author

Listed:
  • Atnashev, Timur M. (Атнашев, Тимур)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Balobanov, A.E. (Балобанов, А.Е.)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

Abstract

The paper analyzes the formation of the two approaches to governance in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. "Project" approach is formed as a separate management disciplines with his ideology and set of tools in the implementation of strategic programs in the area of ??infrastructure, space and defense industry. In parallel with the formation of a "strategic" project line in the government in the twentieth century there was a steady classical approach based on meritocratic selection, specialized legal framework and compliance with the rules. The analysis shows that the most developed and fast-growing developing countries formed the classic civil service as the main instrument of government. Since the beginning of the 1980th under the influence of critics and limitations of the classical model of neo-liberal agenda in economic policy emerged reformist wave of New Public Management, with a focus on improving the effectiveness and efficiency of public administration. In this paper we analyzed the experience of joining the two approaches to governance and its impact on the public service.

Suggested Citation

  • Atnashev, Timur M. (Атнашев, Тимур) & Balobanov, A.E. (Балобанов, А.Е.), 2016. "The Ratio of Project Management Tools and 'Classical' Public Service in OECD Countries and Developing Countries [Соотношение Инструментов Проектного Управления И «Классической» Государственной Служ," Working Papers 2869, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:2869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/2869.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rauch, James E. & Evans, Peter B., 2000. "Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 49-71, January.
    2. Titus Galama & Arie Kapteyn & Raquel Fonseca & Pierre‐Carl Michaud, 2013. "A Health Production Model With Endogenous Retirement," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(8), pages 883-902, August.
    3. Charles J. Hitch, 1996. "Management Problems of Large Organizations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 257-264, April.
    4. Jad Chaaban & Wael Mansour, 2012. "The Impact of Remittances on Education in Jordan, Syria and Lebanon," Working Papers 684, Economic Research Forum, revised 2012.
    5. World Bank, 2000. "Sri Lanka : Recapturing Missed Opportunities," World Bank Publications - Reports 15254, The World Bank Group.
    6. Chris Forman & Anne Gron, 2011. "Vertical Integration and Information Technology Investment in the Insurance Industry," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 180-218.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmet Faruk AYSAN & Mustapha Kamel NABLI & Marie‐Ange VÉGANZONÈS‐VAROUDAKIS, 2007. "Governance Institutions And Private Investment: An Application To The Middle East And North Africa," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 45(3), pages 339-377, September.
    2. Thomas Barnay, 2016. "Health, work and working conditions: a review of the European economic literature," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(6), pages 693-709, July.
    3. Fuhai Hong & Dong Zhang, 2023. "Bureaucratic beliefs and law enforcement," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 196(3), pages 357-379, September.
    4. McCourt, Willy, 2003. "Political Commitment to Reform: Civil Service Reform in Swaziland," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 1015-1031, June.
    5. Kahana, Nava & Qijun, Liu, 2010. "Endemic corruption," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 82-88, March.
    6. Eibich, Peter & Goldzahl, Léontine, 2021. "Does retirement affect secondary preventive care use? Evidence from breast cancer screening," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    7. Minogue, Martin, 2005. "Apples and Oranges: Problems in the Analysis of Comparative Regulatory Governance," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30589, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    8. Leonidas Koutsougeras & Manuel Santos & Fei Xu, 2019. "Corruption and Adverse Selection," Working Papers hal-03393076, HAL.
    9. Dzhumashev, Ratbek, 2014. "Corruption and growth: The role of governance, public spending, and economic development," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 202-215.
    10. Pablo Bandeira, 2009. "Instituciones y desarrollo económico. Un marco conceptual," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 11(20), pages 355-373, January-J.
    11. Dizon-Ross, Rebecca & Dupas, Pascaline & Robinson, Jonathan, 2017. "Governance and the effectiveness of public health subsidies: Evidence from Ghana, Kenya and Uganda," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 150-169.
    12. von Soest, Christian, 2006. "Measuring the Capability to Raise Revenue: Process and Output Dimensions and Their Application to the Zambia Revenue Authority," GIGA Working Papers 35, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    13. Stéphane Straub, 2000. "Factores determinantes empíricos de las buenas instituciones: ¿sabemos algo a ciencia cierta?," Research Department Publications 4216, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    14. Fernanda Odilla, 2020. "Oversee and Punish: Understanding the Fight Against Corruption Involving Government Workers in Brazil," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 140-152.
    15. Mustapha Kamel Nabli, 2007. "Breaking the Barriers to Higher Economic Growth : Better Governance and Deeper Reforms in the Middle East and North Africa," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6914.
    16. Günther G. Schulze & Bambang Suharnoko Sjahrir & Nikita Zakharov, 2016. "Corruption in Russia," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(1), pages 135-171.
    17. Staroňová Katarína, 2017. "Civil-Service Reforms and Communist Legacy: The Case of Slovakia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 177-199, June.
    18. Zhang, Yi & Salm, Martin & van Soest, Arthur, 2018. "The effect of retirement on healthcare utilization: Evidence from China," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 165-177.
    19. Qin, Xiangdong & Shen, Junyi & Meng, Xindan, 2011. "Group-based trust, trustworthiness and voluntary cooperation: Evidence from experimental and survey data in China," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 356-363, August.
    20. Keith Blackburn & Niloy Bose & M. Emranul Haque, 2011. "Public Expenditures, Bureaucratic Corruption And Economic Development," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 79(3), pages 405-428, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    project; program; project management; evaluation; control/indicators; public service; meritocracy; NPM; Max Weber;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:2869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.